Beyond “Political” Communicative Spaces: Talking Politics on the Wife Swap Discussion Forum

REFERENCES

• Albrecht , S. 2006 . Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the Internet . Information, Communication & Society , 9 : 62 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Barnes , M. 2005 . The same old process? Older people, participation and deliberation . Ageing & Society , 25 : 245 – 259 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes , M. , Knops , A. , Newman , J. and Sullivan , H. 2004 . The micro-politics of deliberation: Case studies in public participation . Contemporary Politics , 10 : 93 – 110 .
   Google Scholar
• Basu , S. 1999 . Dialogic ethics and the virtue of humor . The Journal of Political Philosophy , 7 : 378 – 403 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierle , T. C. 2004 . “ Engaging the public through online policy dialogues ” . In Democracy online , Edited by: Shane , P. 155 – 166 . New York : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Bennett , W. L. 1998 . The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics . Ps-Political Science & Politics , 31 : 741 – 761 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brants , K. 2002 . Politics is e-verywhere . Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research , 27 : 171 – 188 .
   Google Scholar
• Coleman , S. 2004 . Connecting Parliament to the public via the Internet . Information, Communication & Society , 7 : 1 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Coleman , S. and Blumler , J. G. 2009 . The Internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy , Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001). Extending the public sphere through cyberspace: The case of Minnesota e-democracy. First Monday: Peer-Reviewed Journal on the Internet, 6(3). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/838/747 (http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/838/747) (Accessed: 3 May 2011 ).
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg , L. 2004 . The Habermasian public sphere: A specification of the idealized conditions of democratic communication . Studies in Social and Political Thought , 10 : 2 – 18 .
   Google Scholar
• De Nooy , W. , Mrvar , A. and Batagelj , V. 2005 . Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek , New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek , J. S. 2000 . Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dunne , K. 2009 . Cross cutting discussion: A form of online discussion discovered within local political online forums . Information Polity , 14 : 219 – 232 .
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph , N. 2000 . Where can Americans talk politics? Civil society, intimacy, and the case for deep citizenship . The Communication Review , 4 : 65 – 95 .
   Google Scholar
• Freelon , D. 2010 . Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication . New Media & Society , 12 : 1172 – 1190 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens , A. 1991 . Modernity and self identity: Self and society in the late modern age , Stanford , CA : Stanford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Graham , T. 2008 . Needles in a haystack: A new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in nonpolitical discussion forums . Javnost—The Public , 15 ( 2 ) : 17 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham , T. 2009 . What's Wife Swap got to do with it? Talking politics in the Net-based public sphere , Amsterdam , , Netherlands : Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam .
   Google Scholar
• Graham , T. 2010 . “ The use of expressives in online political talk: Impeding or facilitating the normative goals of deliberation? ” . In Electronic participation , Edited by: Tambouris , E. , Macintosh , A. and Glassey , O. 26 – 41 . Berlin : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Graham , T. 2011 . “ What's reality television got to do with it? Talking politics in the Net-based public sphere ” . In Political communication in postmodern democracy: Challenging the primacy of politics , Edited by: Brants , K. and Voltmer , K. 248 – 264 . Basingstoke , England : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Graham , T. and Harju , A. 2011 . Reality TV as a trigger of everyday political talk in the Net-based public sphere . European Journal of Communication , 26 : 18 – 32 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann , A. and Thompson , D. 1996 . Democracy and disagreement , Cambridge , MA : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Habermas , J. 1984 . The theory of communicative action, vol. I: Reason and the rationalization of society , Edited by: McCarthy , T. Boston : Beacon . Original work published 1981
   Google Scholar
• Habermas , J. 1987 . The theory of communicative action, vol. II: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason , Edited by: McCarthy , T. Boston : Beacon . Original work published 1981
   Google Scholar
• Habermas , J. 2001 . “ From Kant's “ideas” of pure reason to the “idealizing” presuppositions of communicative action: Reflections on the detranscendentalized “use of reason.” . In Pluralism and the pragmatic turn: The transformation of critical theory , Edited by: Rheg , W. and Bohman , J. 11 – 39 . Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jankowski , N. W. and Van Os , R. 2004 . “ Internet-based political discourse: A case study of electronic democracy in Hoogeveen ” . In Democracy online , Edited by: Shane , P. 181 – 194 . New York : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Jensen , J. L. 2003 . Public spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or government-sponsored—a comparison . Scandinavian Political Studies , 26 : 349 – 374 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kies , R. 2010 . Promises and limits of Web-deliberation , Basingstoke , England : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Koller , M. R. 1988 . Humor and society: Explorations in the sociology of humor , Houston , TX : Cap and Gown Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn , D. 1991 . The skills of argument , Cambridge , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge , J. 1999 . “ Everyday talk in the deliberative system ” . In Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement , Edited by: Macedo , S. 211 – 239 . New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mendelberg , T. 2001 . “ The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence ” . In Political decision making, deliberation and participation: Research in micropolitics , Edited by: Carpini , M. X. D. , Huddy , L. and Shapiro , R. Y. 151 – 193 . Greenwich , CT : JAI Press .
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill , J. 2002 . The rhetoric of deliberation: Some problems in Kantian theories of deliberative democracy . Res Publica , 8 : 249 – 268 .
   Google Scholar
• Polletta , F. and Lee , J. 2006 . Is telling stories good for democracy? Rhetoric in public deliberation after 9/11 . American Sociological Review , 71 : 699 – 723 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postman , N. 1985 . Amusing ourselves to death , London : Methuen .
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg , S. W. 2004 . Reconstructing the concept of democratic deliberation. No. 0402 , Irvine , CA : University of California, Center for the Study of Democracy .
   Google Scholar
• Shaver , P. , Schwartz , J. , Kirson , D. and O'Connor , C. 2001 . “ Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach ” . In Emotions in social psychology: Essential readings , Edited by: Parrott , G. W. 26 – 56 . Philadelphia : Psychology Press .
   Google Scholar
• Shibles , W. 1997 . Humor reference guide: A comprehensive classification and analysis , Carbondale , IL : Southern Illinois University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Steinkuehler , C. A. and Williams , D. 2006 . Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as “third places.” . Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 11 : 885 – 909 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg , K. 2008 . Public deliberation goes on-line? An analysis of citizens' political discussions on the Internet prior to the Finnish parliamentary elections in 2007 . Javnost—The Public , 15 ( 1 ) : 71 – 90 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zoonen , L. 2007 . Audience reactions to Hollywood politics . Media, Culture & Society , 29 : 531 – 547 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm , A. G. 1999 . “ Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is online political discussion? ” . In Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age , Edited by: Hague , B. N. and Loader , B. D. 153 – 178 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Winkler , R. 2005 . Europeans have a say: Online debates and consultations in the EU , Vienna : The Austrian Federal Ministry for Education, Science and Culture, Institute of Technology Assessment of the Austrian Academy of Sciences .
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak , M. E. and Mutz , D. C. 2009 . Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement? . Journal of Communication , 59 : 40 – 59 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright , S. 2011 . Politics as usual? Revolution, normalisation and a new agenda for online deliberation . New Media & Society , Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1461444811410679
   Google Scholar
• Young , I. M. 1996 . “ Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy ” . In Democracy and difference , Edited by: Benhabib , S. 120 – 137 . Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar