Understanding Divergent Patterns of Political Discussion in Online Forums—Evidence from the European Citizens' Consultations

REFERENCES

• Åström , J. 2004 . Mot en digital demokrati? Teknik, politik och institutionell förändring, [Towards a digital democracy: Technology, politics and institutional change] , Örebro , , Sweden : Örebro University .
   Google Scholar
• Åström , J. and Grönlund , Å. 2011 . “ Online consultations in local government–what works, when and why? ” . In Connecting democracy: Online consultation and the flow of political communication. , Edited by: Coleman , S. and Shane , P. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Barber , B. 1984 . Strong democracy , Berkeley : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Blaug , R. Why deliberate? . Presentation made at the 4th Conference on Online Deliberation . June-July . Leeds , , UK
   Google Scholar
• Bohman , J. 1998 . Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy . The Journal of Political Philosophy , 6 ( 4 ) : 400 – 425 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells , M. 2004 . The network society: A cross-cultural perspective , Northampton , MA : Edward Elgar .
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick , A. 2007 . Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity . Political Communication , 24 ( 3 ) : 283 – 301 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers , S. 2001 . “ Constitutional referendums and democratic deliberation ” . In Referendum democracy , Edited by: Mendelsohn , M. and Andrew , A. 231 – 255 . New York : Palgrave .
   Google Scholar
• Clark , J. D. and Themudo , N. S. 2006 . Linking the web and the street: Internet-based ‘dotcauses’ and the ‘anti-globalization’ movement . World Development , 34 ( 1 ) : 50 – 74 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen , J. 1997 . “ Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy ” . In Democracy and difference , Edited by: Benhabib , S. 95 – 119 . Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Coleman , S. and Gøtze , J. 2001 . Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation , London : Hansard Society .
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (2008). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Debate Europe: Building on the experience of Plan D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate. COM (2008), 158/4, Brussels. http://www.ezd.si/fileadmin/doc/4_AKTIVNO_DRZAVLJANSTVO/Viri/Building_on_the_experience_of_Plan_D.pdf (http://www.ezd.si/fileadmin/doc/4_AKTIVNO_DRZAVLJANSTVO/Viri/Building_on_the_experience_of_Plan_D.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Dahl , R. A. and Tufte , E. R. 1973 . Size and democracy , Stanford , CA : Stanford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , T. and Peña-Gangadharan , S. 2009 . Online deliberation: Design, research and practice , Stanford , CA : CSLI Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , T. , O'Connor , B. , Cochran , A. , Efrat , J.J. , Parker , A. Newman , B. 2009 . “ An online environment for democratic deliberation: Motivations, principles, and design ” . In Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice , Edited by: Davies , T. and Peña-Gangadharan , S. 275 – 292 . Stanford , CA : CSLI Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Dickson , E. , Hafer , C. and Landa , D. 2008 . Cognition and strategy: A deliberation experiment . Journal of Politics , 70 ( 4 ) : 974 – 89 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzeck , J. 1994 . Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and political science , Cambridge , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• European Citizens Consultations. (2009). Project outline: European Citizens' Consultations on the future of Europe. http://www.european-citizens-consultations.eu/files/ECC%2009%20Project%20Description%20final.pdf (http://www.european-citizens-consultations.eu/files/ECC%2009%20Project%20Description%20final.pdf) (Accessed: 2 December 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• Fearon , J. D. 1998 . “ Deliberation as discussion ” . In Deliberative democracy , Edited by: Elster , J. 44 – 68 . Cambridge , , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin , J. 1995 . The voice of the people: Public opinion & democracy , New Haven , CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin , J. 2000 . Deliberative polling and public consultation . Parliamentary Affairs , 53 ( 4 ) : 657 – 666 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon , D. G. 2010a . Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication . New Media & Society , 12 ( 7 ) : 1172 – 1190 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon , D. G. 2010b . Talking among themselves: Online youth civic communication in managed and autonomous environments . Information, Communication & Society , 14 ( 2 ) : 198 – 218 .
   Google Scholar
• Fung , A. 2006 . Varieties of participation in complex governance . Public Administration Review , 66 : 66 – 75 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin , R E. 2005 . Sequencing deliberative moments . Acta Politica , 40 ( 2 ) : 182 – 196 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham , T. What's Wife Swap got to do with it? Talking politics online . Presentation made at the 4th Conference on Online Deliberation . June-July . Leeds , , UK
   Google Scholar
• Guttmann , A. and Thompson , D. 1997 . Democracy and disagreement , Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Habermas , J. 1996 . Between facts and norms , Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks , C. M. 2006 . Integrated deliberation: Reconciling civil society's dual role in deliberative democracy . Political Studies , 54 : 486 – 508 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen , D. and Kies , R. 2005 . Online forums and deliberative democracy . Acta Politica , 40 ( 3 ) : 317 – 335 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen , J. 2003 . Public spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or government-sponsored—a comparison . Scandinavian Political Studies , 26 ( 4 ) : 349 – 374 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson , M. 2010 . “ A panacea for Pan-European political participation? Analysis of the European Citizen Consultations ” . In New forms of participation: Normative implications , Edited by: Amnå , E. 97 – 112 . Baden-Baden , , Germany : Nomos verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Kies , R. 2010 . Promises and limits of Web-deliberation , Basingstoke , England : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Kies , R. and Wojick , S. 2011 . “ European web-deliberation: Lessons from the european citizens consultation ” . In From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Online Deliberation, OD2010 , Edited by: De Cindio , F. , Macintosh , A. and Peraboni , C. 198 – 211 . Leeds , , England : Leeds University Business School .
   Google Scholar
• Landa , D. and Meirowitz , A. 2009 . Game theory, information, and deliberative democracy . American Journal of Political Science , 53 ( 2 ) : 427 – 444 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-On , A. and Manin , B. 2009 . “ Happy accidents: Deliberation and online exposure to opposing views ” . In Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice , Edited by: Davies , T. and Peña-Gangadharan , S. 105 – 122 . Stanford , CA : CSLI Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Loukis , E. and Wimmer , M. Analysing different models of structured electronic consultation on legislation under formation . Presentation made at the 4th Conference on Online Deliberation . June-July . Leeds , , UK
   Google Scholar
• Lusoli , W. and Ward , S. 2006 . “ Hunting protestors: Mobilisation, participation, and protest online in the countryside alliance ” . In The Internet and politics: Citizens, voters and activists , Edited by: Oates , S. , Owen , D. and Gibson , R. K. 120 – 155 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh , A. and Whyte , A. Evaluating how eParticipation changes local democracy . Paper presented at the eGovernment Workshop '06 . September . West London , , UK : Brunel University .
   Google Scholar
• Maireder , A. and Schwarzenegger , C. A movement of connected individuals: Social media serving for information, relationship and identity management in the 2009 student protests in Austria . Paper presented at the conference Networking Democracy? New Media Innovations in Participatory Politics . June . Cluj , Romania : Babes-Bolyai University .
   Google Scholar
• Marcu, M., (2009). The EU-27 population continues to grow—Population statistics in Europe 2008: First results. Eurostat – Data in focus 31/2009. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-QA-09-031/EN/KS-QA-09-031-EN.PDF (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-QA-09-031/EN/KS-QA-09-031-EN.PDF)
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell , S. E. 2000 . Sample size and multiple regression analysis . Psychological Methods , 5 ( 4 ) : 434 – 445 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirowitz , A. 2007 . In defence of exclusionary deliberation: Communication and voting with private beliefs and values . Journal of Theoretical Politics , 19 ( 3 ) : 301 – 327 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miegel , F. and Tobias , O. 2008 . “ From pirates to politicians: The story of the Swedish file sharers who became a political party ” . In Democracy, journalism and technology: New developments in an enlarged Europe , Edited by: Carpentier , N. , Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt , P. , Nordenstreng , K. , Hartmann , M. , Vihalemm , P. , Cammaerts , B. , Nieminen , H. and Olsson , T. 203 – 216 . Tartu , , Estonia : Tartu University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Morison , J. and Newman , D.R. 2001 . On-line citizenship: Consultation and participation in New Labour's Britain and beyond . International Review of Law, Computers and Technology , 15 ( 2 ) : 171 – 194 .
   Google Scholar
• Naughton , J. 2001 . “ Contested space: The Internet and global civil society ” . In Global civil society , Edited by: Anheier , H. , Glasius , M. and Kaldor , M. 147 – 168 . Oxford , England : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Neblo , M. A. 2007 . Family disputes: Diversity in defining and measuring deliberation . Swiss Political Science Review , 13 ( 4 ) : 527 – 557 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi , Z. 2004 . Democracy online: Civility, politeness and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups . New Media & Society , 6 ( 2 ) : 259 – 283 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson , T. 2007 . Democratizing European chemicals policy: Lessons from the open consultation on REACH . Journal of Civil Society , 3 ( 3 ) : 223 – 238 .
   Google Scholar
• Pratchett , L. , Durose , C. , Lowndes , V. , Smith , G. , Stoker , G. and Wales , C. 2009 . Empowering communities to influence local decision making: Systematic review of the evidence , London : Communities and Local Government Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Saward , M. 2000 . “ Less than meets the eye: Democratic legitimacy and deliberative theory ” . In Democratic innovation , Edited by: Saward , M. 66 – 77 . Routledge : London .
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg , D. , Zavestoski , S. and Shulman , S. 2009 . “ Deliberation in e-rulemaking? The problem of mass participation ” . In Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice , Edited by: Davies , T. and Peña-Gangadharan , S. 133 – 148 . Stanford , CA : CSLI Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Scott , A. and Street , J. 2000 . From media politics to e-protest . Information, Communication and Society , 3 ( 2 ) : 215 – 240 .
   Google Scholar
• Stasavage , D. 2007 . Polarization and publicity: Rethinking the benefits of deliberative democracy . Journal of Politics , 69 ( 1 ) : 59 – 72 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner , J. 2008 . Concept stretching—The case of deliberation . European Political Science , 7 ( 2 ) : 186 – 190 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner , J. , Bachtiger , A. , Sporndli , M. and Steenbergen , M. R. 2004 . Deliberative politics in action , Cambridge , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2003). Diversity of political conversation on the Internet: Users' perspectives. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/stromergalley.htm (http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/stromergalley.htm)
   Google Scholar
• Suler , J. 2004 . The online disinhibition effect . CyberPsychology & Behavior , 7 : 321 – 326 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sunstein , C. 2001 . Republic.com , Princeton , NJ : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein , C. 2003 . “ The law of group polarization ” . In Debating deliberative democracy , Edited by: Fishkin , J. S. and Laslett , P. 80 – 101 . Malden , MA : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Thompson , D. F. 2008 . Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science . Annual Review of Political Science , 11 : 497 – 520 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trénel , M. 2009 . “ Facilitation and inclusive deliberation ” . In Online deliberation: Design, research and practice , Edited by: Davies , T. and Peña-Gangadharan , S. 253 – 258 . Stanford , CA : CSLI Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Van Laer , J. and Van Aelst , P. 2010 . Internet and social movement action repertoires: opportunities and limitations . Information, Communication & Society , 13 ( 8 ) : 1146 – 1171 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm , A. 1998 . Virtual sounding boards: How deliberative is online political discussion? . Information, Communication & Society , 1 ( 3 ) : 313 – 338 .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , S. 2005 . “ Design matters: The political efficacy of government-run discussion forums ” . In The Internet and politics: Citizens, voters, and activists , Edited by: Oates , S. , Owen , D. and Gibson , R. 80 – 99 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , S. 2009 . “ The role of the moderator: Problems and possibilities for government-run online discussion forums ” . In Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice , Edited by: Davies , T. and Peña-Gangadharan , S. 233 – 242 . Stanford , CA : CSLI Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Wright , S. Politics as usual? Revolution, normalisation and a new agenda for online-deliberation research . Paper presented at the 4th Conference on Online Deliberation . June-July . Leeds , , UK
   Google Scholar
• Wright , S. and Street , J. 2007 . Democracy, deliberation and design: The case of online discussion forums . New Media Society , 9 ( 5 ) : 849 – 869 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar