Screw the majority?: Examining partisans’ outspokenness on social networking sites

References

• Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-K. (2003). The gay right movement in the internet: Is it possible or not? The Journal of Information Society, 4, 53–86.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, S. C. (2019). Who speaks and why? An examination of outspokenness on social networking sites and a reflection on assessing public opinion online. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edz028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, S. C., & Cenite, M. (2012). Biased news or biased public? An examination of audiences’ perceived news bias in an authoritarian press system. Journalism Studies, 13(1), 124–140. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2011.601957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, T.-C. (2012). From same-sex marriage to pluralistic family arrangements: The legislative movement for democratic intimate relationship. Taiwan Human Rights Journal, 1(3), 187–201. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Boster, F. J. (2005). Development and validation of value-, outcome-, and impression-relevant involvement scale. Communication Research, 32(2), 235–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Yang, M., & Chang, J. C. (2009). Elaboration of the hostile media phenomenon: The roles of involvement, media skepticism, congruency of perceived media influence, and perceived opinion climate. Communication Research, 36(1), 54–75. doi:10.1177/0093650208326462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64 (2), 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohle, M., & Bernhard, U. (2013). Corrective or confirmative actions? Political online participation as a consequence of presumed media influence in election campaigns. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(3), 285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearhart, S., & Zhang, W. (2014). Gay bullying and online opinion expression: Testing spiral of silence in the social media environment. Social Science Computer Review, 32(1), 18–36. doi:10.1177/0894439313504261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearhart, S., & Zhang, W. (2015). Was it something I said? No, it was something you posted! A study of the spiral of silence theory in social media contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 208–213. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghannam, J. (2011). Social media in the arab world: leading up to the uprisings of 2011. Washington, DC: Center for International Media Assistance. Retrieved from http://www.cima.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/CIMA-Arab_Social_Media-Report-10-25-11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. (2018). Same-sex marriage and social media: how online networks accelerated the marriage equality movement. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 165–180. doi:10.1006/jesp.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the “spiral of silence”. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 452–463. doi:10.1086/297808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., & Li, J. (2013). Like, comment, share: collaboration and civic engagement within social network sites. In C. Mouza & N. C. Lavigne (Eds.), Emerging technologies for the classroom, explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems (pp. 127–174). New York, The United States: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Bolt, D., Borzekowski, D. L. G., Liebhart, J. L., & Dillard, J. P. (2006). Presumed influence on peer norms: How mass media indirectly affect adolescent smoking. Journal of Communicatin, 56(1), 52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Chia, S. C. (2001). Predicting pluralistic ignorance: The hostile media perception and its consequences. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 688–701. doi:10.1177/107769900107800405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The influence of presumed influence. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 199–215. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02586.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, K. N., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social media and the ‘Spiral of Silence.” Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence/
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., Scheufele, D. A., & Huge, M. E. (2006). Nonparticipation as self-censorship: Publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28(3), 259–283. doi:10.1007/s11109-006-9008-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Pan, Z., & Sun, Y. (2002). Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology, 11(1), 76–97. doi:10.1080/15213260701813454
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 290–314. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, M. (2017). The frame study of same-sex marriage by Taiwan four major daily newspapers: A case of 2011-2015 diverse family formation’s news (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Chinese Cultural University, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Leavey, J. (2013). Social media and public policy: What is the evidence? Retrieved from www.alliance4usefulevidence.org.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y.-B. (2018). The intensifying echo chamber: The micro-power of Facebook users’ flagging behavior-On the issue of same-sex marriage in Taiwan. (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J. S., & Golan, G. J. (2011). Social media activism in response to the influence of political parody videos on YouTube. Communication Research, 38(5), 710–727. doi:10.1177/0093650211405649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. M. (2011). I Tweet honestly, I Tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., Morrison, K. R., & Schemer, C. (2010). A spiral of silence for some: Attitude certainty and the expression of political minority opinions. Communication Research, 37(6), 774–800. doi:10.1177/0093650210362685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A., Matsa, K. E., Gottfried, J., & Kiley, J. (2014). Political polarization and media habits: From fox news to Facebook, how liberals and conservatives keep up with politics. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/files/2014/10/Political-Polarization-and-Media-Habits-FINAL-REPORT-11-10-14-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moy, P., Domke, D., & Stamm, K. (2001). The spiral of silence and public opinion on affirmative action. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(1), 7–25. doi:10.1177/107769900107800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muirhead, R. (2010). Can deliberative democracy be partisan? Critical Review, 22(2–3), 129–157. doi:10.1080/08913811.2010.508631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1995). Public opinion and rationality. In T. L. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent. New York, The United States, Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, J. T., & Cacioppo, R. E. (1979). Attitudes and cognitive response: An electrophysiological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(12), 2181–2199. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. (2010). Corrective’ actions in the public sphere: How perceptions of media and media effects shape political behaviors. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(3), 343–363. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, N. L. (2010). On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. New Jersey:: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, C. T., & Neuwirth, K. (1990). Perceptions of opinion “climates” and willingness to discuss the issue of abortion. Journalism Quarterly, 67(3), 567–577. doi:10.1177/107769909006700312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, C. W., Muzafer, S., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment involvement approach. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the United States: W. B. Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, A. T., & Croucher, S. M. (2008). Basque nationalism and the spiral of silence: An analysis of public perceptions of ETA in Spain and France. The International Communication Gazette, 70(2), 137–153. doi:10.1177/1748048507086909
   Google Scholar
• Tolan, C. (2017, January 31). Taiwan on verge of history as first Asian country to allow same-sex marriage. USA Today. Retrieved from https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/01/31/taiwan-verge-history-first-asian-countryto-allowsame-sex-marriage/97275002/
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavior Scientist, 57(7), 920–942. doi:10.1177/0002764213479375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar