Invisible transparency: Visual attention to disclosures and source recognition in Facebook political advertising

References

• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbu, O. (2014). Advertising, microtargeting and social media. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 163, 44–49. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.284
   Google Scholar
• Barreto, A. M. (2013). Do users look at banner ads on Facebook? Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 7(2), 119. doi:10.1108/JRIM-Mar-2012-0013
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, L. (2017). Trump digital director says Facebook helped win the White House. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/08/trump- digital-director-brad-parscale-facebook-advertising
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., & Kruikemeier, S. (2016). Consumer responses to promoted tweets sent by brands and political parties. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 285–294. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., Willemsen, L. M., & Van Der Aa, E. P. (2017). “This post is sponsored” Effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of Facebook. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38, 82–92. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovet, Bovet, A., & Makse, H. A. (2019). Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election. Nature Communications, 10(1), 7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brettel, M., Reich, J. C., Gavilanes, J. M., & Flatten, T. C. (2015). What Drives Advertising Success on Facebook? An Advertising-Effectiveness Model. Journal of Advertising Research, 55(2), 162–175. doi:10.2501/JAR-55-2-162-175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, D. E., & Green, D. P. (2014). Do Online Advertisements Increase Political Candidates’ Name Recognition or Favorability? Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments. Political Behavior, 36(2), 263. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9239-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J., & Murov, M. (2012). Assessing Accountability in a Post-Citizens United Era: The Effects of Attack Ad Sponsorship by Unknown Independent Groups. American Politics Research, 40(3), 383–418. doi:10.1177/1532673X11414791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bump, P. (2018). What data on more than 3,500 Russian Facebook ads reveals about the interference effort. The Washington Post. Retrieved from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/05/10/what-data-on-more-than- 3500-russian-facebook-ads-reveals-about-the-interference-effort/
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., Mohr, G. S., & Verlegh, P. W. J. (2013). Can disclosures lead consumers to resist covert persuasion? The important roles of disclosure timing and type of response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 483. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, K., Graham, S., & Temple, C. (2011). Advertising on Facebook. International Journal of E-Business Development, 1(1), 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, C. M., & Wichowsky, A. (2013). Does It Matter Who’s Behind the Curtain? Anonymity in Political Advertising and the Effects of Campaign Finance Disclosure. American Politics Research, 41(6), 965–996. doi:10.1177/1532673X13480828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, C. M., & Wichowsky, A. (2015). Attacks without Consequence? Candidates, Parties, Groups, and the Changing Face of Negative Advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 19. doi:10.1111/ajps.2015.59.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutt, R., Deb, A., & Ferrara, E. (2019). “Senator, We Sell Ads”: Analysis of the 2016 Russian Facebook Ads Campaign. In Akoglu L., Ferrara E., Deivamani M., Baeza-Yates R., Yogesh P. (eds) Advances in Data Science. ICIIT 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 941, (pp. 151-168). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3582-2_12.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, L., Sakhuja, S., Dey, R., & McCoy, D. (2019). An Analysis of United States Online Political Advertising Transparency. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsarx&AN=edsarx.1902.04385&site=eds-live
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., Phua, J., Lim, J., & Jun, H. (2017). Disclosing Instagram Influencer Advertising: The Effects of Disclosure Language on Advertising Recognition, Attitudes, and Behavioral Intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 138. doi:10.1080/15252019.2017.1366885
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., & Wojdynski, B. (2020). An introduction to the special issue on native and covert advertising formats. International Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1686332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facebook. (2019). Company Info. Retrieved 3 Oct, 2019, from. https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, M. L., Verlegh, P. W., Kirmani, A., & Smit, E. G. (2015). A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 6–16. doi:10.1080/02650487.2014.995284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31. doi:10.1086/209380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garramone, G. M., & Smith, S. J. (1984). Reactions to Political Advertising: Clarifying Sponsor Effects. Journalism Quarterly, 61(4), 771–775. doi:10.1177/107769908406100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, E. P., & Wajert, L. (2017). The Honest Ads Act Won’t End Social Media Disinformation, but It’s a Start. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3064451
   Google Scholar
• Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363, 374-378. doi: 10.1126/science.aau2706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. L., Golan, G., Britt, B., & Applequist, J. (2020). How advertising relevance and consumer–Brand relationship strength limit disclosure effects of native ads on Twitter. International Journal of Advertising, 39(1),131–165. doi: 10.1080/02650487.2019.1596446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks, J. A., & Schill, D. (2017). The Social Media Election of 2016. In R. Denton Jr (Ed.), The 2016 US Presidential Campaign (pp. 121–150). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650. doi:10.1086/266350 4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, D. A., Franklyn, D., Yee, C., & Rahmati, M. (2017). Going Native: Can Consumers Recognize Native Advertising: Does It Matter. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 19(1), 77–112.
   Google Scholar
• Intelligence Community Assessment. (2017). Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections. Washington D.C.: Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Retrieved from: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Advertising Bureau. (2013). The Native Advertising Playbook. Retrieved from https://www.iab.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/IAB-Native-Advertising- Playbook2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., & Kim, E. (2020). Political Advertising and the Media. In P. Baker. & D. T. Critchlow (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of American Political History (pp. 265–277). New York, NY: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Jung, A. R., & Heo, J. (2019). Ad Disclosure vs. Ad Recognition: How Persuasion Knowledge Influences Native Advertising Evaluation. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 1. doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1520661
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, C. A., & Kiesler, S. B. (1964). Role of Forewarning in Persuasive Communications. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 68(5), 547. doi:10.1037/h0042145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2018). Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google With Campaigns During the 2016 US Presidential Cycle. Political Communication, 35(2), 155–177. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2019). The “Arbiters of What Our Voters See”: Facebook and Google’s struggle with policy, process, and enforcement around political advertising. Political Communication, 36(4), 499–522. doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1619639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., Sezgin, M., & Boerman, S. C. (2016). Political Microtargeting: Relationship Between Personalized Advertising on Facebook and Voters’ Responses. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 19(6), 367–372. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leathern, R. (2018, May 24). Shedding a light on ads with political content. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/05/ads-with-political-content/
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., & Hansen, S. S. (2013). Advertising in social network games: How consumer persuasion knowledge and advertiser sincerity impact eWOM of marketer-generated messages. In Al-Deen H.S.N., Hendricks J.A. (eds), Social Media and Strategic Communications (pp. 3–24). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137287052_1
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. The American Political Science Review, 88(1), 63. doi:10.2307/2944882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, A., & Anderson, M. (2019, April 10). Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2018. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social- media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source Factors and the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 668–672.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, F. N., Saha, K., Babaei, M., Henrique, L., Messias, J., Benevenuto, F., … Redmiles, E. M. (2018). On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook.
   Google Scholar
• Towner, T., . L., & Dulio, D., . A. (2012). New Media and Political Marketing in the United States: 2012 and Beyond. Journal of Political Marketing, 11(1–2), 95–119. doi:10.1080/15377857.2012.642748
   Google Scholar
• Valentino-DeVries, J. (2018). I Approved This Facebook Message – But You Don’t Know That. The New Hampshire Center for Public Interest Journalism. Retrieved from: http://indepthnh.org/2018/02/25/i-approved-this-facebook-message-but-you-dont-know- that/
   Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, E. V., Poels, K., & Walrave, M. (2018). An experimental study on the effect of ad placement, product involvement and motives on Facebook ad avoidance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 470–479. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Noort, G., Antheunis, M. L., & van Reijmersdal, E. A. (2012). Social connections and the persuasiveness of viral campaigns in social network sites: Persuasive intent as the underlying mechanism. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(1), 39–53. doi:10.1080/13527266.2011.620764
   Google Scholar
• Walther, S. T. (2017). Federal Election Commission Advisory Opinion 2017-12. Retrieved from: https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/aos/83728.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. C., Hung, J. C., Huang, C. H., & Chen, J. Y. (2018, July). Advertising Visual Attention to Facebook Social Network: Evidence from Eye Movements. In 2018 7th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) (pp. 68–73). Yonago, Japan: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K. (2018). Social networks, the 2016 US presidential election, and Kantian ethics: Applying the categorical imperative to Cambridge Analytica’s behavioral microtargeting. Journal of Media Ethics, 33(3), 133–148. doi:10.1080/23736992.2018.1477047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, C., Dunaway, J., & Johnson, T. (2012). It’s All in the Name: Source Cue Ambiguity and the Persuasive Appeal of Campaign Ads. Political Behavior, 34(3), 561. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9172-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B. (2017). Introduction: Social Media, Political Marketing and the 2016 U.S. Election. Journal of Political Marketing, 16(3–4), 207–211. doi:10.1080/15377857.2017.1345828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., Bang, H., Keib, K., Jefferson, B. N., Choi, D., & Malson, J. L. (2017). Building a better native advertising disclosure. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 17(2), 150–161. doi:10.1080/15252019.2017.1370401
   Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., & Evans, N. J. (2016). Going native: Effects of disclosure position and language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(2), 157–168. doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1115380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., & Evans, N. J. (2020). The covert advertising recognition and effects (CARE) model: Processes of persuasion in native advertising and other masked formats. International Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 4–31. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1658438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. C. (2018) “It might work too well”: The dark art of political advertising online. The Guardian. (London, England). Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.531496725&site=eds-live
   Google Scholar
• Youn, S., & Kim, S. (2019). Newsfeed native advertising on Facebook: Young millennials’ knowledge, pet peeves, reactance and ad avoidance. International Journal of Advertising, 38(5), 651–683. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1575109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerberg, M. (2018, April 6). https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10104784125525891
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Möller, J., Kruikemeier, S. Ó., Fathaigh, R., Irion, K., Dobber, T., … de Vreese, C. (2018). Online Political Microtargeting: Promises and Threats for Democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), 82–96. doi:10.18352/ulr.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar