“Unpresidented!” or: What happens when the president attacks the federal judiciary on Twitter

References

• Armaly, M. T. (2018). Extra-judicial actor induced change in supreme court legitimacy. Political Research Quarterly, 71(3), 600–613. doi:10.1177/1065912917750278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, B. L., & Johnston, C. D. (2013). On the ideological foundations of supreme court legitimacy in the American Public. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 184–199. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00616.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, B. L., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Explaining processes of institutional opinion leadership. Journal of Politics, 71(1), 249–261. doi:10.1017/S0022381608090166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2014). Separating the Shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 739–753. doi:10.1111/ajps.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldeira, G. A., & Gibson, J. L. (1992). The etiology of public support for the supreme court. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 635–664. doi:10.2307/2111585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1993). Measuring political knowledge: Putting first things first. American Journal of Political Science , 37(4),1179–1206. doi:10.2307/2111549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, B. (2017, December 12). “Grassley tells Trump ‘not to proceed’ on two controversial judicial nominations”. The Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T. C., & Kastellec, J. P. (2015). Source cues and public support for the supreme court. American Politics Research, 43(3), 504–535. doi:10.1177/1532673X14560809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from mechanical turk valid for research on political ideology? Research and Politics, 2, 4. doi:10.1177/2053168015622072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., & Caldeira, G. A. (2009a). Citizens, courts, and confirmations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., & Caldeira, G. A. (2009b). Knowing the supreme court? A reconsideration of public ignorance of the high court. The Journal of Politics, 71(2), 429–441. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., & Baird, V. A. (1998). On the legitimacy of national high courts. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 343–358. doi:10.2307/2585668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., & Spence, L. K. (2003a). Measuring attitudes toward the United States supreme court. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 354–367. doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., & Spence, L. K. (2003b). The supreme court and the US presidential election of 2000: Wounds, self- inflicted or otherwise? British Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 535–556. doi:10.1017/S0007123403000243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., & Nelson, M. J. (2015). Is the U.S. Supreme court’s legitimacy grounded in performance satisfaction and ideology? American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 162–174. doi:10.1111/ajps.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M., & Suhay, E. (2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and americans’ support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 546–560. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2015). ’Who are these people? Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research and Politics, 2(3), 3. doi:10.1177/2053168015604648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. R., & Martin, A. D. (1998). The public’s conditional response to supreme court decisions. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 299–309. doi:10.2307/2585665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. (2017, February 14). Older judges and vacant seats give trump huge power to shape American courts. New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Kernell, S. (2007). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kromphardt, Christopher D.., Joseph L.. Smith, and Anderson M.. Starling. 2019. “Group Identification and Support for the Supreme Court: Evidence from Evangelical Protestants”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 58 (4): 854–873 doi:10.1111/jssr.v58.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, R. (2002). Experimental methodology in political science. Political Analysis, 10(4), 325–342. doi:10.1093/pan/10.4.325
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, M. D., Rogol, N. C., & Kingsland, J. T. (2019). Presidential Rhetoric and U.S. Supreme court rulings: The effect of going public on citizen evaluations of institutions and policy. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 49(4), 870–897. doi:10.1111/psq.12596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. doi:10.1017/XPS.2015.19
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. J., & Gibson, J. L. (2018). Has Trump Trumped the courts? New York University Law Review, 93, 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. J., & Gibson, J. L. (2019). How does hyperpoliticized rhetoric affect the US supreme court’s legitimacy? The Journal of Politics, 81(4), 1512–1516. doi:10.1086/704701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In: Communication and Persuasion. Springer Series in Social Psychology (pp. 1–24). Springer, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five Decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar