Mixing messages: How candidates vary in their use of Twitter

References

• Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., Simon, A., & Valentino, N. (1994). Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? American Political Science Review, 88(4), 829–838. doi:10.2307/2082710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, R. D. (1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auter, Z. J., & Fine, J. A. (2016). Negative campaigning in the social media age: Attack advertising on Facebook. Political Behavior, 38(4), 999–1020. doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9346-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auter, Z. J., & Fine, J. A. (2018). Social media campaigning: Mobilization and fundraising on Facebook. Social Science Quarterly, 99(1), 185–200. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. (1999). Seeing spots: a functional analysis of presidential television advertisements, 1952–1996. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A., & Achen, C. (2019). Civic duty and voter turnout. Political Behavior, 41(2), 473–497. doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9459-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political Ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Poltiical Science, 49(2), 388–405. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damore, D. (2002). Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative. Political Research Quarterly, 55(3), 669–685. doi:10.1177/106591290205500309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damore, D. (2004). The Dynamics of Issue Ownership in Presidential Campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 391–397. doi:10.1177/106591290405700304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2010). Timeless strategy meets new medium: Going negative on congressional campaign web sites, 2002-2006. Political Communication, 27(1), 88–103. doi:10.1080/10584600903502607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., Parkin, M., & Montes, I. (2017). An inside view of congressional campaigning on the web. Journal of Political Marketing, 7857, 1–34. doi:10.1080/15377857.2016.1274279
   Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K. (2015). Encouraging civic participation through Twitter during (and after) the 2012 election. In M. T. Rogers & D. M. Gooch (Eds.), Civic education in the twenty-first century: A multidimensional inquiry (pp. 145–160). Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K. (2016). Communication with constituents in 140 characters. In R. Davis, C. Holtz-Bacha, & M. R. Just (Eds.), Twitter and elections around the world: Campaigning in 140 Characters or Less (pp. 91–105). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., & Sipole, S. (2017). From home style to Twitter-style: How personal, district, and campaign characteristics affect candidates’ Twitter-Style. In G. Richardson Jr (Ed.), Social media and politics: A new way to participate in the political process (pp. 71–88). Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., Brown, K. J., & Wimberly, T. (2018). “Delete your account”: The 2016 Presidential race on Twitter. Social Science Computer Review, 36(4), 500–508. doi:10.1177/0894439317728722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., & Clark, J. H. (2016). “You Tweet Like a Girl!” How Female Candidates Campaign on Twitter. American Politics Research, 44(2), 326–352. doi:10.1177/1532673X15597747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., Cordova, V., & Sipole, S. (2014). Twitter style: An analysis of how house candidates used twitter in their 2012 campaigns. PS - Political Science and Politics, 47(2), 454–462. doi:10.1017/S1049096514000389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, H. K., Gonzales, A., & Strouse, K. (2017). Mudslinging on Twitter During the 2014 Election. Social Media+Society, 3(2), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, E. F., & Ridout, T. (2010). Advertising trends in 2010. The Forum, 8(4), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, E. F., & Ridout, T. (2013). Negative, angry, and ubiquitous: Political advertising in 2012. The Forum, 10(4), 51–61. doi:10.1515/forum-2013-0004
   Google Scholar
• Gainous, J., & Wagner, K. M. (2014). Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, B. T., Evans, H. K., & Russell, A. (2020). Fear and loathing on Twitter: Exploring negative rhetoric in tweets during the 2018 midterm election. In S. Foreman, M. L. Godwin, & W. C. Wilson (Eds.), The roads to congress 2018 (pp. 31–52). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, K., & Freedman, P. (2002). Campaign advertising and voter Turnout: New evidence for a stimulation effect. Political Communication, 19(1), 5–28. doi:10.1080/105846002317246461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J., & Johnson, K. (2016). Twitter taunts and tirades: Negative campaigning in the age of Trump. PS, Political Science & Politics, 49(4), 748–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassell, H., & Oeltjenbruns, K. (2015). When to attack: The trajectory of congressional campaign negativity. American Politics Research, 44(2), 222–246. doi:10.1177/1532673X15589613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, Y. (2018). Twitter accounts of U.S. 2018 Midterm election candidates. https://github.com/vegetable68/Midterm-2018-candidates
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L. (2014). From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In David O. Sears, Jack S. Levy, and Leonie Huddy (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 737–773). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., Waldman, P., & Sherr, S. (2000). Eliminate the Negative? Defining and refining categories of analysis for political advertisements. In J. Thurber, C. J. Nelson, & D. A. Dulio (Eds.), Crowded airwaves: Campaign advertising in elections (pp. 44–64). Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 1(1), 72–91. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1999). Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation. American Political Science Review, 93(4), 877–889. doi:10.2307/2586118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreis, R. (2017). The “Tweet Politics” of President Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 607–618. doi:10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y. (2011). When does negativity demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect Of Negative Campaigning On Voter Turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 55(4), 797–813. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R., & Pomper, G. (2004). Negative campaigning: An analysis of US senate elections. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R., & Rovner, I. B. (2009). Negative Campaigning. Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 285–306. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071905.101448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing Toolkit. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, 55–60. Baltimore, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mechkova, V., & Wilson, S. (2019). Does gender still matter for politics? The Case of the 2018 U.S. Elections on Twitter. Digital Society Project Working Paper #2.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, B. L. (2017). The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59–68. doi:10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. D. (2012). To Tweet or Not to Tweet: Exploring the Determinants of Early Adoption of Twitter by House Members in the 111th Congress. The Social Science Journal, 49(4), 430–438. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridout, T., & Searles, K. (2011). It’s My Campaign I’ll Cry if I Want to: How and When Campaigns Use Emotional Appeals. Political Psychology, 32(3), 439–458. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00819.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A. (2018). U.S. Senators on Twitter: Asymmetric Party Rhetoric in 140 Characters. American Politics Research, 46(4), 695–723. doi:10.1177/1532673X17715619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigelman, L., & Buell, E. H., Jr. (2003). You Take the High Road and I’ll Take the Low Road? The Interplay of Attack Strategies and Tactics in Presidential Campaigns. Journal of Politics, 65(2), 518–531. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.t01-2-00013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013). Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Straus, J. R., Glassman, M. E., Shogan, C. J., & Smelcer, S. N. (2013). Communicating in 140 characters or less: Congressional adoption of twitter in the 111th congress. PS - Political Science and Politics, 46(1), 60–66. doi:10.1017/S1049096512001242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. (2014). Presidential Campaigning in the Internet Age. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J., Zhang, F., Hemsley, J., & Tanupabrungsun, S. (2018). Tweeting the Attack: Predicting Gubernatorial Candidate Attack Messaging and Its Spread. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3511–3532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theilman, J., & Wilhite, A. (1998). Campaign Tactics and the Decision to Attack. The Journal of Politics, 60(4), 1050–1062. doi:10.2307/2647730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. (2011). Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170. doi:10.1017/S0022381610000939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesleyan Median Project. (2018). 61% Increase in Volume of Negative Ads. https://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/releases/103018/
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & Gulati, G. J. (2012). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the congressional elections of 2006 and 2008. New Media & Society, 15(1), 52–71. doi:10.1177/1461444812457332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar