Increasing citizen participation in e-participatory budgeting processes

References

• Åström, J. (2001). Should democracy online be quick, strong, or thin? Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 49–51. doi:10.1145/357489.357505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auvin En, T. (2016). A road to direct democracy. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 8(2), 172–208.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (2003). Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age, pp. 1–356. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-Government 2.0: social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, W. E., Dodson, F., Newton, E. M., Perlner, R. A., Polk, W. T., Gupta, S., & Nabbus, E. A. (2013). Electronic authentication guideline.  Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST SP 800-63–2.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, D. (2011, September). Explaining international leadership: electronic identification systems. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, pp. 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2008). Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance. Isjlp, 5, 9.
   Google Scholar
• City of Tartu. (2016), Statistics users e-PB project Tartu. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1UAP-U0_SB1XyfWILtDp7dJ9iwT-HfzJ25TjJxe1e7As
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe (CoE) and Ad hoc Committee on e-democracy. (2009). Electronic democracy (“e-democracy”): Recommendation CM/Rec (2009)1 and explanatory memorandum. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1998). On democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001). Democracy via cyberspace: Mapping the rhetorics and practices of three prominent camps. New Media & Society, 3(2), 157–177. doi:10.1177/14614440122226038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Santos, B. S. (1998). Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: towards a redistributive democracy. Politics & Society, 26(4), 461–510. doi:10.1177/0032329298026004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2011). Document management in local government: finding the real savings (report). Retrieved from http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedKingdom/Local%20Assets/Documents/Industries/GPS/UK_GPS_DocumentManagementinLocalGovernment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Draheim, D., Koosapoeg, K., Lauk, M., Pappel, I., Pappel, I., & Tepandi, J. (2016). The design of the estonian governmental document exchange classification framework. EGOVIS 2016. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. (pp. 33–47). Porto, Portugal: LNCS; 9831.
   Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., … Srivastava, S. C. (2015). Research on information systems failures and successes: status update and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 143–157. doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eesti Statistika. (2016). Retrieved from https://stat.ee/
   Google Scholar
• e-Estonia (2017). Retrieved from https://e-estonia.com/
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, D. E. S. (2012). Participação e deliberação: Análise do impacto dos usos das novas tecnologias digitais na dinâmica dos orçamentos participativos de Belo Horizonte e Recife. (Diss. Tese). (Doutorado em Ciência Política). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Miller, G. J. (2006). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fossedal, G. (2018). Direct democracy in Switzerland. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 50–73. doi:10.1177/0020852311429667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund, Å., & Horan, T. (2005). Introducing e-Gov: history, definitions, and Issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.01539
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-Government research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243–265. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinsoo, S. (2016). Obstacles related to e-invoice implantation in SME sector (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://audiitorkogu.ee/uploads/M_Sirli%20Heinsoo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hölgersson, J., Söderström, E., & Rose, J. (2019). Digital inclusion for elderly citizens for a sustainable society. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden, June 8-14.https://id.ee/
   Google Scholar
• id.ee. (2003). Retrieved from https://id.ee/
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2014). ISO 18091:2014(en), quality management systems — guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2008 in local government. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:18091:ed-1:v1:en
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2015). “ISO 9001:2015(en), quality management systems — requirements. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9001:ed-5:v1:en
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Trustworthiness of digital government services: deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modelling. Public Management Review, 20.5(2018), 647–671. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1305689
   Google Scholar
• Kaplinski, L. (2016). Interview. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1-Z0Ybg6Vtcen_QeWPL4Xl48iJWtKXsDlTtuK1JmUtFM
   Google Scholar
• Krenjova, J., & Reinsalu, L. (2013). Good governance starts from procedural changes: case study of preparing participatory budgeting in the city of Tartu. Socialiniai tyrimai/Social Research, 32(3), 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Krimmer, R., Triessnig, S., & Volkamer, M. (2007). The development of remote e-voting around the world: areview of roads and directions. In A. Alkassar & M. Volkamer (Eds.), E-voting and identity. Vote-ID 2007. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 4896), pp. 1-15. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Legard, S., Giannoumis, G. A., Hovik, S., & Paupini, C. (2019). Variation in e-participation schemes and strategies: Comparative case study of Oslo, Madrid, and Melbourne. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. Melbourne, Australia: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lidén, G. (2013). Supply of and demand for e-democracy: astudy of the Swedish case. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 18(3), 217–232. doi:10.3233/IP-130308
   Google Scholar
• Lukka, L. (2016). Interview. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jm9whgC2V0xwSBmFx0E_bG_OhM1aORGViq3D7oXTX0A
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. HICSS, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. (pp. 50117.1) Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2008). Evaluation of eParticipation. Retrieved from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/WhyteMacintoshfordissemination.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, J., Weisenfeld, U., Kurczewska, A., Sokolowicz, M., Tegtmeier, S., & Berg, S. H. (2019). Citizen entrepreneurship: towards involvement, inclusion and integration of citizens in entrepreneurial Europe. In RENT (pp. 2019). Jean-Baptiste Say Institute for Entrepreneurship, ESCP Europe, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr. (2000). Research on policy implementation: assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 10(2), 263–288. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024270
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003). Promise and problems of e-democracy: challenges of online citizen engagement. Paris, France: OECD Publishing..
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Open Government: The Global Context and the Way Forward. OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Okeke-Uzodike, O. E., & Dlamini, B. (2019). Citizens’ e-participation at local municipal government in South Africa. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 458–468. doi:10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.39
   Google Scholar
• Paide, K., Pappel, I., Vainsalu, H., & Draheim, D. (2018). On the systematic exploitation of the Estonian data exchange layer X-Road for strengthening public-private partnerships. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 34–41. Galway, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Päivärinta, T., & Sæbø, Ø. (2006). Models of e-democracy. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17(1), 818–840. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.01737
   Google Scholar
• Pappel, I., Pappel, I., & Saarmann, M. (2012). Digital records keeping to information governance in estonian local governments. June C. A. Shoniregun & G. A. Akmayeva Eds., i-Society 2012: Proceedings: I-Society 2012 (pp. 199–204). London, UK: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Pappel, I., & Pappel, I. (2012). Integral and secure cloud architecture based system for backup and retention of public sector information. In M. B. Nunes, G. C. Peng, J. Roth, H. Weghorn, & P. Isaias (Eds.), IADIS 2012. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference of Internet Applications and Research. (pp. 105–110) Lisbon: IADIS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pappel, I., Pappel, I., Tampere, T., & Draheim, D. (2017a, Lisbon). Implementation of e-invoicing principles in estonian local governments. In A. Borges, V. João, & J. C. Dias (Eds.), ECDG 2017. Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Digital Government (pp. 127–136). Lisbon, Portugal: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pappel, I., Tsap, V., Pappel, I., & Draheim, D. (2019a). Exploring e-services development in local government authorities by means of electronic document management systems. In A. Chugunov, Y. Misnikov, E. Roshchin, & D. Trutnev (Eds.), EGOSE 2018. Electronic governance and open society: Challenges in Eurasia, communications in computer and information science, pp. 223-234. : Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pappel, I., & Pappel, I. (2011). Methodology for measuring the digital capability of local governments. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 357–358). Tallinn, Estonia.
   Google Scholar
• Pappel, I., Pappel, I., Tepandi, J., & Draheim, D. (2017b). Systematic Digital Signing in Estonian e-Government Processes. In: Hameurlain A., Küng J., Wagner R., Dang T., Thoai N. (eds) Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXXVI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10720. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56266-6_2
   Google Scholar
• Pappel, I., Tsap, V., & Draheim, D. (2019b). The e-LocGov Model for Introducing e-Governance into Local Governments: an Estonian Case Study. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing (Early Access). doi: 10.1109/TETC.2019.2910199.
   Google Scholar
• Phang, C. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2008). A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives. Communications of the ACM, 51(12), 128. doi:10.1145/1409360.1409385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzebon, M., Cunha, M. A., & Coelho, T. R. (2004). Making sense to decreasing citizen eParticipation through a social representation lens. Information and Organization, 26(3), 84–99. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2016.07.002
   Google Scholar
• Republic of Estonia Information System Authority. (2016). Retrieved from https://ria.ee/en/
   Google Scholar
• Ronchi, A. M. (2019). e-Participation. In e-Democracy (pp. 27–59). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sampaio, R. C. (2016). e-Participatory budgeting as an initiative of e-requests: prospecting for leading cases and reflections on e-participation. RAP: Revista Brasileira De Administração Pública, 50(6), 937–958.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, C., & Rose, J. (2007). Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), 406–421. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sar, H. K., & Wong, T. Y. C. (2012). Web-based document management systems in the construction industry in construction economics and managements (Working paper) Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, A. (2007). Participatory budgeting. In Public sector governance and accountability, Shah, Anwar (Eds.), pp. 1–269. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Solvak, M., & Vassil, K. (2016). e-Voting in Estonia: Technological diffusion and other developments over ten years (2005-2015). Tartu, Estonia: Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, C. (2001). Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environment and Urbanization, 13(1), 159–184. doi:10.1177/095624780101300112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., Richter, C., Jameson, S., & Perez de Pulgar, C. (2016). Customers, users or citizens? Inclusion, spatial data and governance in the smart city. Inclusion, Spatial Data and Governance in the Smart City, June 9.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, J. C. (2007). Can e–consultations meet citizen’s satisfaction in urban development plans? Case Study: Providencia, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Vassil, K., Solvak, M., Vinkel, P., Trechsel, A. H., & Alvarez, R. M. (2016). The diffusion of internet voting. usage patterns of internet voting in estonia between 2005 and 2015. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 453–459. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zeb, A., Khattak, M. K., Jamal, H., & Khattak, A. K. (2016). Analysis of digital democracy’s promotion through social media. New Horizons, 10(1), 95–104.
   Google Scholar