References

  • American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2016). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (9th ed.). AAPOR. Retrieved from https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf
  • Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2001). Winners, losers, and attitudes about government in contemporary democracies. International Political Science Review, 22, 321–338. doi:10.1177/019251210102200404
  • Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Diehl, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2019). Antecedents of internal political efficacy incidental news exposure online and the mediating role of political discussion. Politics, 39(1), 82–100.
  • Baek, Y. M., & Wojcieszak, M. E. (2009). Don’t expect too much! Learning from late-night comedy and knowledge item difficulty. Communication Research, 36(6), 783. doi:10.1177/0093650209346805
  • Baum, M. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20(2), 173–190. doi:10.1080/10584600390211181
  • Beaudoin, C. E., & Thorson, E. (2004). Testing the cognitive mediation model: The roles of news reliance and three gratifications sought. Communication Research, 31, 446–471. doi:10.1177/0093650204266098
  • Bennett, S. E. (1997). Knowledge of politics and sense of subjective political competence. American Politics Quarterly, 25, 230–240. doi:10.1177/1532673X9702500205
  • Bergström, A., & Belfrage, J. M. (2018). News in social media: Incidental consumption and the role of opinion leaders. Digital Journalism, 6(5), 583–598. doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1423625
  • Boczkowski, P. J., Mitchelstein, E., & Matassi, M. (2018). “News comes across when I’m in a moment of leisure”: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3523–3539. doi:10.1177/1461444817750396
  • Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Borah, P., & Shah, D. V. (2013). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 414–429. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12048
  • Boulianne, S. (2018). Twenty years of digital media effects on civic and political participation. Communication Research. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0093650218808186
  • Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60, 680–700. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01509.x
  • Chaffee, S., & Frank, S. (1996). How Americans get political information: Print versus broadcast news. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, 48–58. doi:10.1177/000271629654600105
  • Cho, J., Shah, D., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M., & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19, 66–88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x
  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. doi:10.1086/257897
  • Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from nonelection, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28, 571–601. doi:10.1177/009365001028005001
  • Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2002). News information processing as mediator of the relationship between motivations and political knowledge. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 26–40. doi:10.1177/107769900207900103
  • Eveland, W. P., Jr., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30, 359–386. doi:10.1177/0093650203253369
  • Feezell, J. T. (2018). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482–494. doi:10.1177/1065912917744895
  • Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2450–2468. doi:10.1177/1461444817724170
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 612–634.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
  • Jung, N., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication & Society, 14(4), 407–430. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.496135
  • Kaiser, J., Keller, T. R., & Kleinen-von Königslöw, K. (2018). Incidental news exposure on Facebook as a social experience: The influence of recommender and media cues on news selection. Communication Research. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0093650218803529
  • Kanervo, E., Zhang, W., & Sawyer, C. (2005). Communication and democratic participation: A critical review and synthesis. The Review of Communication, 5, 193–206. doi:10.1080/15358590500422585
  • Katz, E., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communication (pp. 19–32). London, UK: Faber.
  • Kaye, B. K., & Johnson, T. J. (2011). Hot diggity blog: A cluster analysis examining motivations and other factors for why people judge different types of blogs as credible. Mass Communication and Society, 14(2), 236–263. doi:10.1080/15205431003687280
  • Kim, Y., Chen, H., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2607–2614. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.005
  • Kim, Y. M. (2008). Where is my issue? The influence of news coverage and personal issue importance on subsequent information selection on the web. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 600–621. doi:10.1080/08838150802437438
  • Kitchen, J. P., Kerr, G. E., Schultz, D., McColl, R., & Pals, H. (2014). The elaboration likelihood model: Review, critique and research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 48(11/12), 2033–2050. doi:10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0776
  • Lee, J. K., & Kim, E. (2017). Incidental exposure to news: Predictors in the social media setting and effects on information gain online. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 1008–1015. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.018
  • Lemert, J. B. (1984). News context and the elimination of mobilizing information: An experiment. Journalism Quarterly, 61, 243–249. doi:10.1177/107769908406100201
  • Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315–336. doi:10.1080/105846099198659
  • Meirick, P. C. (2013). Motivated misperception? Party, education, partisan news, and belief in ‘death panels.’. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 39–57. doi:10.1177/1077699012468696
  • Morozov, E. (2009). The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy, 19(05).
  • Morrell, M. E. (2003). Survey and experimental evidence or a reliable and valid measure o internal political efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 589–602. doi:10.1086/378965
  • Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2018). The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Communication and Society, 21(2), 225–247. doi:10.1080/15205436.2017.1384022
  • Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. London: Penguin.
  • Perse, E. M. (1990). Media Involvement and Local News Effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34, 17–36. doi:10.1080/08838159009386723
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuation: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Pew Research Center. (2018a). Social media outpaces print newspapers in the U.S. as a news source. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/12/10/social-media-outpaces-print-newspapers-in-the-u-s-as-a-news-source/
  • Pew Research Center. (2018b). News use across social media platforms 2018. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/
  • Popkin, S. (1994). The reasoning voter (2nd ed.). New York: University of Chicago Press.
  • Prior, M. (2003). Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication, 20(2), 149–171. doi:10.1080/10584600390211172
  • Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577–592. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x
  • Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44, 409–432. doi:10.1023/A:1024232915870
  • Serrano-Puche, J., Beatriz Fernández, C., & Rodríguez-Virgili, J. (2018). Political information and incidental exposure in social media: The cases of Argentina, Chile, Spain and Mexico. Doxa Comunicación, 27, 19–42.
  • Shah, D. V., Rojas, H., & Cho, J. (2009). Media and civic participation: On understanding and misunderstanding communication effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 207–227). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., … McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of Communication, 57, 676–703. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00363.x
  • Strömbäck, J., Falasca, K., & Kruikemeier, S. (2018). The mix of media use matters: Investigating the effects of individual news repertoires on offline and online political participation. Political Communication, 35(3), 413–432. doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1385549
  • Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576. doi:10.1111/jcom.2010.60.issue-3
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Enclave extremism and journalism’s brave new world. NiemanReports.org. Retrieved from http://niemanreports.org/articles/enclave-extremism-and-journalisms-brave-new-world/
  • Tewksbury, D., Weaver, A. J., & Maddex, B. D. (2001). Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 533–554. doi:10.1177/107769900107800309
  • Valeriani, A., & Vaccari, C. (2016). Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1857–1874. doi:10.1177/1461444815616223
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic volunteerism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Watson, N., & Wooden, M. (2006). Modeling longitudinal survey response: The experience of the HILDA survey. Paper presented at ACSPRI Social Science Methodology Conference, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://old.acspri.org.au/conference2006/proceedings
  • Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental exposure, selective exposure, and political information sharing: Integrating online exposure patterns and expression on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363–379. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12199
  • Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436–455. doi:10.1177/00027640121957286
  • White, H. A. (1997). Considering interacting factors in the third-person effect: Argument strength and social distance. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74(3), 557–564. doi:10.1177/107769909707400309
  • Yamamoto, M., & Morey, A. C. (2019). Incidental news exposure on social media: A campaign communication mediation approach. Social Media + Society, 5, 205630511984361. doi:10.1177/2056305119843619
  • Yoo, S. W., & Gil De Zúñiga, H. (2019). The role of heterogeneous political discussion and partisanship on the effects of incidental news exposure online. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 1–16. doi:10.1080/19331681.2018.1561346

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.