What explains popular support for government monitoring in China?

References

• Cantoni, D., Chen, Y., Yang, D. Y., Yuchtman, N., & Zhang, Y. J. (2017). Curriculum and ideology. Journal of Political Economy, 125(2), 338–392. doi:10.1086/690951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepel, Z. U. (2012). An analysis of state–civil society relations in Finland: A case of Joensuu. Voluntas, 23, 328–349. doi:10.1007/s11266-011-9199-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. (2004). Popular political support in urban China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C., & Moore, W. (2010). What stops the torture? American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 459–476. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00441.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and the domestic democratic peace. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. W., & Silver, B. D. (2004). Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 28–46. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00054.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327. doi:10.1093/esr/jci022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denemark, D. (2012). Trust, efficacy and opposition to anti-terrorism police power: Australia in comparative perspective. Australian Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–113. doi:10.1080/10361146.2011.643163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457. doi:10.1017/S0007123400008309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2014). Identity, surveillance and modernity: Sorting out who’s who. In K. Ball (Ed.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 159–166). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, J. (2000). Unofficial aid as a shaper of relations between the third sector and the state. In M. Siisiainen, P. Kinnunen, and E. Hietanen (Eds.), The third sector in Finland. Review to research of the Finnish third sector (pp. 152–161). Rovaniemi, Finland: The Finnish Federation for Social Welfare and Health, University of Lapland.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (1988). Civil society and the state: New European perspectives. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, L. C., Tate, C., & Poe, S. C. (2009). Is the law a mere parchment barrier to human rights abuse? Journal of Politics, 71(2), 644–660. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343. doi:10.1017/S0003055413000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostka, G., & Antoine, L. (2020). Fostering model citizenship: Behavioral responses to China’s emerging social credit systems. Policy & Internet, 12(3), 256–289. doi:10.1002/poi3.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostka, G. (2019). China’s social credit systems and public opinion: Explaining high levels of approval. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1565–1593. doi:10.1177/1461444819826402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M. (1989). Of rule and revenue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., & Weingast, B. R. 2020. Law, Chinese style: Solving the authoritarian’s legal dilemma through the private provision of law. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–13. doi:10.1177/2053951714541861
   Google Scholar
• Marcella, A., Bragheri, L., Eichmeyer, S., Kim, M., Stantcheva, S., & Yang, D. 2020. Civil liberties in times of crisis. Working paper: http://davidyyang.com/pdfs/civilliberty_draft.pdf, accessed May 18, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Nakhaie, R., & de Lint, W. (2013). Trust and support for surveillance policies in Canadian and American opinion. International Criminal Justice Review, 23(2), 149–169. doi:10.1177/1057567713487207
   Google Scholar
• Pavone, V., & Degli Esposti, S. (2012). Public assessment of new surveillance-oriented security technologies: Beyond the trade-off between privacy and security. Public Understanding of Science, 21(5), 556–572. doi:10.1177/0963662510376886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe, S., Tate, N., & Keith, L. C. (1999). Repression of the human right to personal integrity revisited: A global cross-national study covering the years 1976–1993. International Studies Quarterly, 43(2), 291–313. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potoglou, D., Dunkerley, F., Patil, S., & Robinson, N. (2017). Public preferences for internet surveillance, data retention and privacy enhancing services: Evidence from a pan-European study. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 811–825. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, B., Strömberg, D., & Wu, Y. (2017). Why does China allow freer social media? Protests versus surveillance and propaganda. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 117–140. doi:10.1257/jep.31.1.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. G., Chatfield, A. T., & Jaramillo, P. A. (2015). Public opinion on National Security Agency surveillance programs: A multi-method approach. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 129–141. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 441–459. doi:10.5129/001041508X12911362383354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, X., & Truex, R. (Forthcoming). In search of self-censorship. British Journal of Political Science.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenonius, O., & Björklund, F. (2018). Explaining attitudes to secret surveillance in post-communist societies. East European Politics, 34(2), 123–151. doi:10.1080/21599165.2018.1454314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, W. (2016). Populist authoritarianism: Chinese political culture and regime sustainability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trüdinger, E.-M., & Steckermeier, L. (2017). Trusting and controlling? Political trust, information and acceptance of surveillance policies: The case of Germany. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 421–433. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, G. (2001). China’s golden shield: Corporations and the development of surveil- lance technology in the People’s Republic of China. Montreal, Canada: Rights & Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Q. (2019). The road to digital unfreedom: President Xi’s surveillance state. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, B. (2004). Consensus crisis and civil society: The sichuan earthquake response and state–society relations. The China Journal, 71, 91–108. doi:10.1086/674555
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X., Kostka, G., & Cao, X. (Forthcoming). Information control and public support for social credit systems in China. Journal of Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X. (2021). To repress or to co‐opt? Authoritarian control in the age of digital surveillance. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 309–325. doi:10.1111/ajps.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government–nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172. doi:10.1177/0899764000291009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar