Neural blockchain technology for a new anticorruption token: towards a novel governance model

References

• Aarvik, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence - a promising anti corruption tool in development settings? CMI. U4 anti-corruption resource centre (U4 Report 2019:1). Retrieved from https://www.u4.no/publications/artificial-intelligence-a-promising-anti-corruption-tool-in-development-settings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Aarvik, P. (2020). Blockchain as an anti-corruption tool. Case examples and introduction to the technology (CMI. U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre. U4 Issue 2020:7). Retrieved from https://www.u4.no/publications/are-blockchain-technologies-efficient-in-combatting-corruption.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Abodei, E., Norta, A., Azogu, I., Udokwu, C., & Draheim, D. (2019). Blockchain technology for enabling transparent and traceable government collaboration in public project processes of developing economies. In Digital transformation for a sustainable society in the 21st Century. I3E 2019. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 11701, pp. 464–475). Trondheim, Norway. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-29374-1_38.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, R., Kewell, B., & Parry, G. (2018). Blockchain for good? Digital ledger technology and sustainable development goals. In Leal Filho W., Marans R., Callewaert J. (Eds.), Handbook of sustainability and social science research (pp. 127–140). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-67122-2_7.
   Google Scholar
• Akaba, T. I., Norta, A., Udokwu, C., & Draheim, D. (2020). A framework for the adoption of blockchain-based e-procurement systems in the public sector. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society (pp. 3–14). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_1.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Breiki, H., Rehman, M. H. U., Salah, K., & Svetinovic, D. (2020). Trustworthy blockchain oracles: Review, comparison, and open research challenges. IEEE Access, 8, 85675–85685. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexopoulos, C., Charalabidis, Y., Androutsopoulou, A., Loutsaris, M. A., & Lachana, Z. (2019). Benefits and obstacles of blockchain applications in e-Government. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. doi: 10.24251/HICSS.2019.408.
   Google Scholar
• Aruka, Y. (2020) The rise of smart contract and its complex impacts on the digital ecosystem. Proceedings of the 23rd Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems. IES 2019. Proceedings in Adaptation, Learning and Optimization, vol 12. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-37442-6_2.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1984). Strong Democracy (pp. 132 and 308). USA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoletti, M., & Pompianu, L. (2017). An empirical analysis of smart contracts: Platforms, applications, and design patterns. financial cryptography and data security. In Brenner M. et al. (Eds.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2017. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 10323). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70278-0_31.
   Google Scholar
• Benítez-Martínez, F. L., Hurtado-Torres, M. V., & Romero-Frías, E. (2020). A neural blockchain for a tokenizable e-Participation model. Neurocomputing. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.03.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryl, J., Bourgery, T., & Hanson, A. (2018). Blockchains unchained: Blockchain technology and its in the public sector (OECD Working Paper, Public Gov., no. 28), 53.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2013). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bienhaus, F., & Haddud, A. (2018). Procurement 4.0: Factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains. Business Process Magazine Journal, 24(4), 965–984. doi:10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buerger, & Hans-Helge. (2016). Ethereum White Paper: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Retrieved from https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/White-Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Casallas, J. A. T., Cueva Lovelle, J. M., & Rodríguez Molano, J. I. (2020, July). Smart contracts with blockchain in the public sector. UNIR Magazine, Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain. doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2020.07.005.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A. (2019). Blockchain in the government technology fabric. IIAS-Lien 2019 conference: Science, Technology and Innovation Policies track. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08517
   Google Scholar
• Davila, A., Gupta, M., & Palmer, R. (2003). Moving procurement systems to the internet: The adoption and use of e-procurement technology models. European Management Journal, 21(1), 11–23. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00155-X
   Google Scholar
• Davtyan-Davydova, D. N., Martirosyan, M. G., Bortenev, A. I., & Sergacheva, O. A. (2019). Implementation and realization of technologies to distributed registers (Blockchain) and smart-contracts in public purchases. Competitive Russia: foresight model of economic and legal development in the digital age. International scientific conference in memory of Oleg Inshakov (pp. 569–576). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-45913-0_67.
   Google Scholar
• Diedrich, & Henning. (2016). Ethereum: Blockchains, digital assets, smart contracts, decentralized autonomous organizations. London, United Kingdom: Wildfire Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Donohoe, H., Stellefson, M., & Tennant, B. (2012). Advantages and limitations of the e-Delphi technique. American Journal of Health Education, 43, 34–46. doi:10.1080/19325037.2012.10599216
   Google Scholar
• DuPont, Q., Gkikaki, M., & Rowan, C. (2020, Summer). DAO, blockchain and cryptography. A conversation with Quinn Dupont. Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 7(3). doi: 10.31273/eirj.v7i3.594.
   Google Scholar
• Engelenburg, S., Janssen, M., & Klievink, B. (2019). Design of a software architecture supporting business-to-government information sharing to improve public safety and security. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 52, 595–618. doi:10.1007/s10844-017-0478-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esoimeme, E. E. (2020). Institutionalising the war against corruption: New approaches to assets tracing and recovery. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 217–230. doi:10.1108/JFC-12-2018-0125
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament resolution of 26 May 2016 on virtual currencies (2016/2007(INI)). Retrieved from https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/ficheprocedure.do?lang=en&reference=2016/2007(INI)
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S. (2019). Addressing the influence of groupthink during ideation concerned with new applications of technology in society. Technology in Society, 57, 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami, S., & Kazeminia, M. (2019). Smart Blockchain is the new generation of Blockchain networks. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@info.solidity/smart-blockchain-is-the-new-generation-of-blockchain-networks-2dd95cc2aba0
   Google Scholar
• Groznik, A., & Trkman, P. (2009). Upstream supply chain management in e-government: The case of Slovenia. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 459–467. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekara, H. G., Sridarran, P., & Rajaratnam, D. (2020). Effective use of blockchain technology for facilities management procurement process. Journal of Facilities Management. doi:10.1108/JFM-10-2020-0077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, T. M., & Lawrence, M. (2020). Democratic digital infrastructure. Building a 21st Century network in the UK and US. Retrieved from https://www.common-wealth.co.uk/reports/democratic-digital-infrastructure
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C. A., & Williams, S. P. (2008). E-government policy and practice: A theoretical and empirical exploration of public e-procurement. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 155–180. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEDERA Hashgraph Platform. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.hedera.com/platform
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, K. (2012, July). Doing the e-Delphi. using online survey tools. CIN: Computers, informatics. Nursing, 30(7), 347–350. doi:10.1097/NXN.0b013e31825e8923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IOTA Foundation Tangle protocol. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.iota.org/research/meet-the-tangle
   Google Scholar
• Kamath, R. (2018). Crypto-governance blockchain governance for sustainable development goals 16 and 17. Asian Development Perspectives, 9(2), 111–128. doi:10.22681/adp.2018.9.2.111
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Krishnan, S., & Dhir, A. (2021). Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120737. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, N. (2018). Public procurement fundamentals: Lessons from and for the field (Includes a simple step-by-step generic procurement manual). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Kang, T. (2017). Does technology against corruption always lead to benefit? The potential risks and challenges of the blockchain technology. The 2017 OECD Global Anti- Corruption & Integrity Forum. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/cleangovbiz/Integrity-Forum-2017-Kim-Kang-blockchain-technology.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Kang, T. (2019). Will blockchain bring an end to corruption?: Areas of applications and potential challenges. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change (IJISSC), 10(2), 35–44. doi:10.4018/IJISSC.2019040103
   Google Scholar
• Klabi, H., Mellouli, S., & Rekik, M. (2018). A reputation based electronic government procurement model. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S43–S53. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langseth, P., Stapenhurst, R., & Pope, J. (1999). National integrity systems. In Curbing corruption: Toward a model for building national integrity. Washington, D.C: World Bank. Retrieved from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1999/04/13/000094946_99032505570349/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf#page=139
   Google Scholar
• Lazuashvili, N., Norta, A., & Draheim, D. (2019). Integration of blockchain technology into a land registration system for immutable traceability: A case study of Georgia. BPM 2019. LNBIP (Vol. 361, pp. 219–233). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Luciano, E., Magnagnagno, O., Souza, R., & Wiedenhöft, G. (2020). Blockchain potential contribution to reducing corruption vulnerabilities in the brazilian context. Seventh International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 135–142). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096749
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, T. K., & Cuomo, R. E. (2020). An interdisciplinary review of digital technologies to facilitate anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in medicines procurement. Global Health Action, 13(sup1), 1695241. doi:10.1080/16549716.2019.1695241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellouli, S., & Bouslama, F. (2009). Multi-agent based framework for e-government. Electronic Government, An International Journal, 6, 177–192. doi:10.1504/EG.2009.024441
   Google Scholar
• Meshkat, B., Cowman, S., Gethin, G., Ryan, K., Wiley, M., Brick, A., … Mulligan, E. (2014). Using an e-Delphi technique in achieving consensus across disciplines for developing best practice in day surgery in Ireland. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3. doi:10.5430/jha.v3n4p1
   Google Scholar
• Moubarak, J., Chamoun, M., & Filiol, E. (2020). On distributed ledgers security and illegal uses. Future Generation Computer Systems, 113, 183–195. doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.06.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/files/bitcoin-paper/bitcoin_es.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neudecker, T., & Hartenstein, H. (2019) Short Paper: An empirical analysis of blockchain forks in bitcoin. Financial cryptography and data security. FC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol 11598). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32101-7_6
   Google Scholar
• Nicoletti, B. (2018). Blockchain in procurement. In Agile procurement (pp. 214–217). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan (Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61085-6_2.
   Google Scholar
• Norta, A., Matulevičius, R., & Leiding, B. (2019). Safeguarding a formalized blockchain- enabled identity-authentication protocol by applying security risk-oriented patterns. Computers & Security, 86, 253–269. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2019.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Consequences of corruption at the sector level and implications for economic growth and development. Paris, FR: Author. Retrieved from https://read.oecd.org/10.1787/9789264230781-en?format=pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Preventing corruption in public procurement. Paris, FR: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). Council Report on the implementation of the recommendation of the Council on public procurement, JT03449826. Retrieved from https://one.oecd.org/document/C(2019)94/FINAL/en/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in government: Benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 355–364. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinsberg, B. (2020). Fully-automated liberalism? Blockchain technology and international cooperation in an anarchic world. International Theory, 1–27. doi:10.1017/S1752971920000305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejeb, A., Süle, E., & Keogh, J. G. (2018, December). Exploring new technologies in procurement. Transport & Logistics: The International Journal, 18(45). .
   Google Scholar
• Swan, M. (2015, December). Blockchain thinking: The brain as a decentralized autonomous corporation. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine (pp. 41–52). doi: 10.1109/MTS.2015.2494358.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2018). Blockchain, bitcoin and corruption. A review of the linkages. Retrieved from https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/assets/uploads/helpdesk/Blockchain-bitcoin-and-corruption-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government–A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2011). Fighting corruption in the health sector: Methods, tools and good practices. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Democratic%20Governance/IP/Anticorruption%20Methods%20and%20Tools%20in%20Health%20Lo%20Res%20final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2018). Briefing note on Blockchain for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: New York, NY, USA. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/cefact/cf_plenary/2018_plenary/ECE_TRADE_C_CEFACT_2018_25E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Division for Sustainable Development Goals: New York, NY, USA. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. (2015). SDG 16. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/sdg-16/
   Google Scholar
• Velasco, C., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Cano, R. (2020). Neural distributed ledger. IEEE Software, 37, 43–48. doi:10.1109/MS.2020.2993370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwitter, A., & Herman, J. (2018). Blockchain for sustainable development goals: #Blockchain4SDGs - Report 2018. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Retrieved from https://www.rug.nl/research/portal/files/63204374/351162_Paper_Blockchain_4SDGs_A4_RUG_CF_LRdef_2_.pdf
   Google Scholar