Imagineering a new way of governing: the blockchain and res publica

References

• Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (Eds.). (2005). Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media and Society, 11(6), 985–1002. doi:10.1177/1461444809336551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutel, Theodor. 2018. Decentralizing power, competence and incentives – a case study on emerging visions in the Blockchain space. [ Unpublished Master’s dissertation]. University of Edinburgh Business School Unpublished Master’s dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Bodó, B. (2020). Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media and Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1461444820939922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buterin, V. (2013). Ethereum Whitepaper. Retrieved from https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/
   Google Scholar
• Buterin, V. (2014). Cryptoeconomic protocols in the context of wider society. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S47iWiKKvLA
   Google Scholar
• Buterin, V. (2019). Notes on Blockchain governance. Retrieved from https://hackernoon.com/notes-on-blockchain-governance-ob65o3pod
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Verduyn, M., & Hütten, M. (2019). Beyond scandal? Blockchain technologies and the legitimacy of post-2008 finance. Finance and Society, 5, 126–144. Advance online publication. doi: 10.2218/finsoc.v5i2.4137.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, N. (2019). Market for rules: The promise and peril of blockchain distributed governance. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 9(2), 213–226. doi:10.1108/JEPP-03-2019-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, C. (2018). Why decentralization batters. Medium. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@cdixon/whydecentralization-matters-5e3f79f7638e
   Google Scholar
• Dowlen, O. (2008). The political potential of sortition: A study of the random selection of citizens for public office. Exeter, UK; Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• DuPont, Q. (2014). The politics of cryptography: Bitcoin and the ordering machines. Journal of Peer Production, 1(4), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Finley, K. (2016). A $50 million hack just showed that the DAO was all too human. The Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2016/06/50-million-hack-just-showed-dao-human/
   Google Scholar
• Golumbia, D. (2016). Bitcoin as politics: Distributed right-wing extremism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, U. (2009). Anarchism and the politics of technology. Labor and Society, 12(3), 489–503.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D. (2014). Roman political thought: From Cicero to Augustine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge, MI: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honohan, I., & Jennings, J. (2006). Republicanism in theory and practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Honohan, I. (2002). Civic republicanism. London, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, K., & Beard, M. (2005). The colosseum. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manski, S. (2017). Building the blockchain world: Technological commonwealth or just more of the same? Strategic Change: Briefings in Entrepreneurial Finance, 26(5), 413–522. doi:10.1002/jsc.2151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, Sarah, and Michel Bauwens. 2020. “Reimagining new socio-technical economics through the application of distributed ledger technologies‘ Frontiers in blockchain.“ 10.3389/fbloc.2019.00029 .
   Google Scholar
• Miscione, G., & Kavanagh, D. (2015). Bitcoin and the Blockchain: A coup d’État through digital heterotopia? Humanistic Management Network. Research Paper Series No. 23/15. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2624922
   Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. White Paper. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organizational Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. doi:10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (1999). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2012). On the people’s terms: A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reijers, W., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2018). The Blockchain as a narrative technology: Investigating the social ontology and normative configurations of cryptocurrencies. Philosophy & Technology, 31, 103–130. doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0239-x
   Google Scholar
• Reijers, W., O’Brolcháin, F., & Haynes, P. (2016). Governance in blockchain technologies and social contract theories. Ledger, 1, 134–151. doi:10.5195/ledger.2016.62
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, Renny, Eldar Saljic, and Dusko Tomic. 2020. “The institutional landscape of blockchain governance: A taxonomy for incorporation at the nation state.” TEM Journal, 9(1): 181–187. Accessed 10 June, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, B. (2014). Visions of techno-Leviathan, the politics of the bitcoin blockchain. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/2014/06/01/visions-of-a-techno-leviathan-the-politics-of-the-bitcoin-blockchain/
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, B. (2017). Thoughts on tokens: Tokens are early today, but will transform technology tomorrow. Medium. Retrieved from https://news.earn.com/thoughts-on-tokens-436109aabcbe
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, E. B. (2020). How information systems came to rule the world: Reflections on the information systems field. Information Society, 36(2), 109–123. doi:10.1080/01972243.2019.1709931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, S. (2016). Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Communication of the ACM, 59, 15–17. doi:10.1145/2994581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, -P.-P. (2005). What things do – Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Penn State: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werbach, Kevin. 2018 The blockchain and the new architecture of trust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A., & de Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized Blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. Social Science Research Network 2580664. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2580664
   Google Scholar
• Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Chid, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology? A systematic review. PloS One, 11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar