2,679
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Recapitulation of molecular regulators of nuclear motion during cell migration

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 50-62 | Received 07 May 2018, Accepted 18 Jul 2018, Published online: 27 Sep 2018

References

  • Entschladen F, Drell TL, Lang K, et al. Analysis methods of human cell migration. Exp Cell Res. 2005;307:418–426.
  • Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, et al. Cell migration: integrating Signals from Front to Back. Science. 2003;302:1704–1709.
  • Denais CM, Gilbert RM, Isermann P, et al. Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration. Science. 2016;352:353–358.
  • Irianto J, Pfeifer CR, Bennett RR, et al. Nuclear constriction segregates mobile nuclear proteins away from chromatin. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27:4011–4020.
  • Davies PF, Manduchi E, Jiménez JM, et al. Biofluids, cell mechanics and epigenetics: flow-induced epigenetic mechanisms of endothelial gene expression. J Biomech. 2017;50:3–10.
  • Guilak F, Tedrow JR, Burgkart R. Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;269:781–786.
  • Tseng Y, Lee JS, Kole TP, et al. Micro-organization and visco-elasticity of the interphase nucleus revealed by particle nanotracking. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:2159–2167.
  • Verkhovsky AB, Svitkina TM, Borisy GG. Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm. Curr Biol. 1999;9:11–20.
  • Swift J, Discher DE. The nuclear lamina is mechano-responsive to ECM elasticity in mature tissue. J Cell Sci. 2014;127:3005–3015.
  • Kim DH, Cho S, Wirtz D. Tight coupling between nucleus and cell migration through the perinuclear actin cap. J Cell Sci. 2014;127:2528–2541.
  • Raab M, Gentili M, De Belly H, et al. ESCRT III repairs nuclear envelope ruptures during cell migration to limit DNA damage and cell death. Science. 2016;352:359–362.
  • Lauffenburger DA, Horwitz AF. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell. 1996;84:359–369.
  • Gundersen GG, Worman HJ. Nuclear positioning. Cell. 2013;152:1376–1389.
  • Folker ES, Baylies MK. Nuclear positioning in muscle development and disease. Front Physiol. 2013;4:363.
  • Banerjee I, Zhang J, Moore-Morris T, et al. Targeted ablation of nesprin 1 and nesprin 2 from murine myocardium results in cardiomyopathy, altered nuclear morphology and inhibition of the biomechanical gene response. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004114.
  • Benedetti S, Bertini E, Iannaccone S, et al. Dominant LMNA mutations can cause combined muscular dystrophy and peripheral neuropathy. J Neurology, Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:1019–1021.
  • Lee JSH, Hale CM, Panorchan P, et al. Nuclear lamin A/C deficiency induces defects in cell mechanics, polarization, and migration. Biophys J. 2007;93:2542–2552.
  • Wolf K, Te Lindert M, Krause M, et al. Physical limits of cell migration: control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force. J Cell Biol. 2013;201:1069–1084.
  • Beadle C, Assanah MC, Monzo P, et al. The role of myosin II in glioma invasion of the brain. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:3357–3368.
  • Bergert M, Chandradoss SD, Desai RA, et al. Cell mechanics control rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia during migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:14434–14439.
  • Giri A, Bajpai S, Trenton N, et al. The Arp2/3 complex mediates multigeneration dendritic protrusions for efficient 3-dimensional cancer cell migration. FASEB J. 2013;27:4089–4099.
  • Wilson K, Lewalle A, Fritzsche M, et al. Mechanisms of leading edge protrusion in interstitial migration. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2896.
  • Hadden WJ, Young JL, Holle AW, et al. Stem cell migration and mechanotransduction on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:5647–5652.
  • Doyle AD, Petrie RJ, Kutys ML, et al. Dimensions in cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013;25:642–649.
  • Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, et al. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2014;12:207–218.
  • Zaman MH, Trapani LM, Sieminski AL, et al. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:10889–10894.
  • Luxton GWG, Gomes ER, Folker ES, et al. Linear arrays of nuclear envelope proteins harness retrograde actin flow for nuclear movement. Science. 2010;329:956–959.
  • Tian B, Lessan K, Kahm J, et al. beta 1 integrin regulates fibroblast viability during collagen matrix contraction through a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/protein kinase B signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:24667–24675.
  • Lämmermann T, Bader BL, Monkley SJ, et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature. 2008;453:51–55.
  • Vicente-Manzanares M, Koach MA, Whitmore L, et al. Segregation and activation of myosin IIB creates a rear in migrating cells. J Cell Biol. 2008;183:543–554.
  • Sanger JM, Sanger JW, Southwick FS. Host cell actin assembly is necessary and likely to provide the propulsive force for intracellular movement of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect Immun. 1992;60:3609–3619.
  • Marks J. Localization of F-actin through the cell division cycle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eur J Cell Biology. 1985;39:27–32.
  • Holm P, Kayser L, Sandvig K. Delivery to lysosomes in the human carcinoma cell line HEp-2 involves an actin filament-facilitated fusion between mature endosomes and preexisting lysosomes. Eur J Cell Biol. 1995;66:309–323.
  • Spudich JA, Watt S. The regulation of rabbit skeletal muscle contraction I. Biochemical studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin and the proteolytic fragments of myosin. J Biol Chem. 1971;246:4866–4871.
  • Nagayama K, Yamazaki S, Yahiro Y, et al. Estimation of the mechanical connection between apical stress fibers and the nucleus in vascular smooth muscle cells cultured on a substrate. J Biomech. 2014;47:1422–1429.
  • Katoh K, Masuda M, Kano Y, et al. Focal adhesion proteins associated with apical stress fibers of human fibroblasts. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1995;31:177–195.
  • Khatau SB, Hale CM, Stewart-Hutchinson PJ, et al. A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:19017–19022.
  • Kim DH, Wirtz D. Cytoskeletal tension induces the polarized architecture of the nucleus. Biomaterials. 2015;48:161–172.
  • Versaevel M, Grevesse T, Gabriele S. Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat Commun. 2012;3:671.
  • Khatau SB, Bloom RJ, Bajpai S, et al. The distinct roles of the nucleus and nucleus-cytoskeleton connections in three-dimensional cell migration. Sci Rep. 2012;2.
  • Gay O, Gilquin B, Assard N, et al. Refilins are short-lived actin-bundling proteins that regulate lamellipodium protrusion dynamics. Biol Open. 2016;5:1351–1361.
  • Weinberg R. The biology of cancer. Garland Sci. 2013.
  • Harada T, Swift J, Irianto J, et al. Nuclear lamin stiffness is a barrier to 3D migration, but softness can limit survival. J Cell Biol. 2014;204:669–682.
  • Gay O, Gilquin B, Nakamura F, et al. RefilinB (FAM101B) targets filamin A to organize perinuclear actin networks and regulates nuclear shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:11464–11469.
  • Huelsmann S, Brown NH. Nuclear positioning by actin cables and perinuclear actin: special and general?. Nucleus. 2014;5:219–223.
  • Thiam HR, Vargas P, Carpi N, Crespo CL, Raab M, Terriac E, et al. Perinuclear Arp2/3-driven actin polymerization enables nuclear deformation to facilitate cell migration through complex environments. Nature Communications. 2016;7:10997.
  • Skau CT, Fischer RSGurel P, et al. FMN2 makes perinuclear actin to protect nuclei during confined migration and promote metastasis. Cell. 2016;167820 (1571–85):e18
  • Thomas DG, Yenepalli ADenais CM, et al. Nonmuscle myosin IIB is critical for nuclear translocation during 3D invasion. J Cell Biol. 2015;210:583–594.
  • Chang W, Antoku S, Ostlund C, et al. Linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex-mediated actin-dependent nuclear positioning orients centrosomes in migrating myoblasts. Nucleus. 2015;6:77–88.
  • Dupin I, Sakamoto Y, Etienne-Manneville S. Cytoplasmic intermediate filaments mediate actin-driven positioning of the nucleus. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:865–872.
  • Etienne-Manneville S. Microtubules in cell migration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2013;29:471–499.
  • Zhang J, Guo WH, Wang YL. Microtubules stabilize cell polarity by localizing rear signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:16383–16388.
  • Pouthas F, Girard P, Lecaudey V, et al. In migrating cells, the Golgi complex and the position of the centrosome depend on geometrical constraints of the substratum. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:2406–2414.
  • Thery M, Racine V, Piel M, et al. Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:19771–19776.
  • Itoh RE, Kurokawa K, Ohba Y, Yoshizaki H, Mochizuki N, Matsuda M. Activation of rac and cdc42 video imaged by fluorescent resonance energy transfer-based single-molecule probes in the membrane of living cells. Molecular and cellular biology. 2002;22:6582–6591.
  • Lee JSH, Chang MI, Tseng Y, et al. Cdc42 mediates nucleus movement and MTOC polarization in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts under mechanical shear stress. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:871–880.
  • Etienne-Manneville S. Cdc42 - the centre of polarity. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:1291–1300.
  • Belaadi N, Aureille J, Guilluy C. Under pressure: mechanical stress management in the nucleus. Cells. 2016;5:27.
  • Kutscheidt S, Zhu R, Antoku S, et al. FHOD1 interaction with nesprin-2G mediates TAN line formation and nuclear movement. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:708–715.
  • Starr DA. A nuclear-envelope bridge positions nuclei and moves chromosomes. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:577–586.
  • Maninová M, Vomastek T. Dorsal stress fibers, transverse actin arcs, and perinuclear actin fibers form an interconnected network that induces nuclear movement in polarizing fibroblasts. FEBS J. 2016;283:3676–3693.
  • Crisp M, Liu Q, Roux K, et al. Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:41–53.
  • Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Biol. 2009;10:75–82.
  • Haque F, Lloyd DJ, Smallwood DT, et al. SUN1 interacts with nuclear lamin A and cytoplasmic nesprins to provide a physical connection between the nuclear lamina and the cytoskeleton. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:3738–3751.
  • Friedl P, Wolf K, Lammerding J. Nuclear mechanics during cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011;23:55–64.
  • Kim DI, Birendra KC, Roux KJ. Making the LINC: SUN and KASH protein interactions. Biol Chem. 2015;396:295–310.
  • Meier I. LINCing the eukaryotic tree of life–towards a broad evolutionary comparison of nucleocytoplasmic bridging complexes. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:3523–3531.
  • Janin A, Bauer D, Ratti F, et al. Nuclear envelopathies: a complex LINC between nuclear envelope and pathology. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:147.
  • Wilhelmsen K, Ketema M, Truong H, et al. KASH-domain proteins in nuclear migration, anchorage and other processes. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:5021–5029.
  • Razafsky D, Wirtz D, Hodzic D. Nuclear envelope in nuclear positioning and cell migration. In: Schirmer EC, De Las Heras JI, editors. Cancer Biology and the Nuclear Envelope: recent Advances May Elucidate Past Paradoxes. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2014. p. 471–490.
  • Zhang X, Lei K, Yuan X, et al. SUN1/2 and Syne/Nesprin-1/2 Complexes Connect Centrosome to the Nucleus during Neurogenesis and Neuronal Migration in Mice. Neuron. 2009;64:173–187.
  • Zhang Q, Ragnauth CD, Skepper JN, et al. Nesprin-2 is a multi-isomeric protein that binds lamin and emerin at the nuclear envelope and forms a subcellular network in skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:673–687.
  • Mislow JM, Holaska JM, Kim MS, et al. Nesprin‐1α self‐associates and binds directly to emerin and lamin A in vitro. FEBS Letters. 2002;525:135–140.
  • Luxton GG, Gomes ER, Folker ES, et al. TAN lines. Nucleus. 2011;2:173–181.
  • Yu J, Lei K, Zhou M, et al. KASH protein Syne-2/Nesprin-2 and SUN proteins SUN1/2 mediate nuclear migration during mammalian retinal development. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;20:1061–1073.
  • Libotte T, Zaim H, Abraham S, et al. Lamin A/C-dependent localization of Nesprin-2, a giant scaffolder at the nuclear envelope. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:3411–3424.
  • Ketema M, Wilhelmsen K, Kuikman I, et al. Requirements for the localization of nesprin-3 at the nuclear envelope and its interaction with plectin. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:3384–3394.
  • Postel R, Ketema M, Kuikman I, et al. Nesprin-3 augments peripheral nuclear localization of intermediate filaments in zebrafish. J Cell Sci. 2011;124:755–764.
  • Petrie RJ, Harlin HM, Korsak LIT, et al. Activating the nuclear piston mechanism of 3D migration in tumor cells. J Cell Biol. 2016;216:93–100.
  • Roux KJ, Crisp ML, Liu Q, et al. Nesprin 4 is an outer nuclear membrane protein that can induce kinesin-mediated cell polarization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:2194–2199.
  • Lamalice L, Le Boeuf F, Huot J. Endothelial cell migration during angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2007;100:782–794.
  • Graham DM, Burridge K. Mechanotransduction and nuclear function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2016;40:98–105.
  • Cartwright S, Karakesisoglou I. Nesprins in health and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;29:169–179.
  • Fairley EA, Kendrick-Jones J, Ellis JA. The emery-dreifuss muscular dystrophy phenotype arises from aberrant targeting and binding of emerin at the inner nuclear membrane. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:2571–2582.
  • Horn HF, Brownstein Z, Lenz DR, et al. The LINC complex is essential for hearing. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:740–750.
  • Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:63–73.
  • Xie W, Chojnowski A, Boudier T, et al. A-type lamins form distinct filamentous networks with differential nuclear pore complex associations. Curr Biol. 2016;26:2651–2658.
  • Osmanagic-Myers S, Dechat T, Foisner R. Lamins at the crossroads of mechanosignaling. Genes Dev. 2015;29:225–237.
  • Young SG, Jung H-J, Lee JM, et al. Nuclear Lamins and Neurobiology. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34:2776–2785.
  • Kim J-K, Louhghalam A, Lee G, et al. Nuclear lamin A/C harnesses the perinuclear apical actin cables to protect nuclear morphology. Nat Commun. 2017;8:2123.
  • Swift J, Ivanovska IL, Buxboim A, et al. Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science. 2013;341:1240104.
  • Dutta S, Bhattacharyya M, Sengupta K. Implications and assessment of the elastic behavior of lamins in laminopathies. Cells. 2016;5:37.
  • Webster M, Witkin KL, Cohen-Fix O. Sizing up the nucleus: nuclear shape, size and nuclear-envelope assembly. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:1477–1486.
  • Alberio R, Johnson AD, Stick R, et al. Differential nuclear remodeling of mammalian somatic cells by Xenopus laevis oocyte and egg cytoplasm. Exp Cell Res. 2005;307:131–141.
  • Butin-Israeli V, Adam SA, Goldman AE, et al. Nuclear lamin functions and disease. Trends in Genetics. 2012;28:464–471.
  • Koss LG. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A Triumph and A Tragedy. Jama. 1989;261:737–743.
  • Kim DH, Li B, Si FW, et al. Volume regulation and shape bifurcation in the cell nucleus. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:3375–3385.
  • Lautscham LA, Kämmerer C, Lange JR, et al. Migration in confined 3D environments is determined by a combination of adhesiveness, nuclear volume, contractility, and cell stiffness. Biophys J. 2015;109:900–913.
  • Dahl KN, Engler AJ, Pajerowski JD, et al. Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures. Biophys J. 2005;89:2855–2864.
  • Lee H, Adams WJ, Alford PW, et al. Cytoskeletal prestress regulates nuclear shape and stiffness in cardiac myocytes. Exp Biol Med. 2015;240:1543–1554.
  • Torbati M, Lele TP, Agrawal A. Ultradonut topology of the nuclear envelope. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:11094–11099.
  • Gruenbaum Y, Margalit A, Goldman RD, et al. The nuclear lamina comes of age. Nat Rev Mol Biol. 2005;6:21–31.
  • Worman HJ, Courvalin JC. Nuclear envelope, nuclear lamina, and inherited disease. Int Rev Cytol. 2005;246:231–279.
  • Wang R, Kamgoue A, Normand C, et al. High resolution microscopy reveals the nuclear shape of budding yeast during cell cycle and in various biological states. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:4480–4495.
  • Chen B, Co C, Ho CC. Cell shape dependent regulation of nuclear morphology. Biomaterials. 2015;67:129–136.
  • Ihalainen TO, Aires L, Herzog FA, et al. Differential basal-to-apical accessibility of lamin A/C epitopes in the nuclear lamina regulated by changes in cytoskeletal tension. Nat Mater. 2015;14:1252–1261.
  • Werner M, Blanquer G, Haimi P, et al. Surface curvature differentially regulates stem cell migration and differentiation via altered attachment morphology and nuclear deformation. Adv Sci. 2017;4:1600347.
  • Liu X, Liu R, Gu Y, et al. Nonmonotonic self-deformation of cell nuclei on topological surfaces with micropillar array. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:18521–18530.
  • Dapena C, Bravo I, Cuadrado A, et al. Nuclear and cell morphological changes during the cell cycle and growth of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum. Protist. 2015;166:146–160.
  • Guo M, Pegoraro AF, Mao A, et al. Cell volume change through water efflux impacts cell stiffness and stem cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:E8618–E8627.
  • Finan JD, Chalut KJ, Wax A, et al. Nonlinear osmotic properties of the cell nucleus. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009;37:477–491.
  • Sims JR, Karp S, Ingber DF. Altering the cellular mechanical force balance results in integrated changes in cell, cytoskeletal and nuclear shape. J Cell Sci. 1992;103:1215–1222.
  • Dahl KN, Kahn SM, Wilson KL, et al. The nuclear envelope lamina network has elasticity and a compressibility limit suggestive of a molecular shock absorber. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:4779–4786.
  • Chan CJ, Li W, Cojoc G, et al. Volume transitions of isolated cell nuclei induced by rapid temperature increase. Biophys J. 2017;112:1063–1076.
  • McGregor AL, Hsia CR, Lammerding J. Squish and squeeze-the nucleus as a physical barrier during migration in confined environments. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2016;40:32–40.
  • Paul CD, Mistriotis P, Konstantopoulos K. Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:131–140.
  • Pajerowski JD, Dahl KN, Zhong FL, et al. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:15619–15624.
  • Lammerding J, Fong LG, Ji JY, et al. Lamins A and C but not lamin B1 regulate nuclear mechanics. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:25768–25780.
  • Panorchan P, Schafer BW, Wirtz D, et al. Nuclear envelope breakdown requires overcoming the mechanical integrity of the nuclear lamina. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:43462–43467.
  • Khan ZS, Santos JM, Hussain F. Aggressive prostate cancer cell nuclei have reduced stiffness. Biomicrofluidics. 2018;12:014102.
  • Heuze ML, Vargas P, Chabaud M, et al. Migration of dendritic cells: physical principles, molecular mechanisms, and functional implications. Immunol Rev. 2013;256:240–254.
  • Hatch EM, Hetzer MW. Nuclear envelope rupture is induced by actin-based nucleus confinement. J Cell Biol. 2016;215:27–36.
  • Davidson PM, Sliz J, Isermann P, et al. Design of a microfluidic device to quantify dynamic intra-nuclear deformation during cell migration through confining environments. Integr Biol. 2015;7:1534–1546.
  • Davidson PM, Denais C, Bakshi MC, et al. Nuclear deformability constitutes a rate-limiting step during cell migration in 3-D environments. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2014;7:293–306.
  • Irianto J, Pfeifer CR, Xia Y, et al. Constricted cell migration causes nuclear lamina damage, DNA breaks, and squeeze-out of repair factors. bioRxiv. 2015.
  • Irianto J, Xia Y, Pfeifer CR, et al. DNA damage follows repair factor depletion and portends genome variation in cancer cells after pore migration. Curr Biol. 2017;27:210–223.
  • Rivera-Feliciano J, Lee K-H, Kong SW, et al. Development of heart valves requires Gata4 expression in endothelial-derived cells. Development. 2006;133:3607–3618.
  • Dahl KN, Ribeiro AJ, Lammerding J. Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ Res. 2008;102:1307–1318.
  • Dahl KN, Kalinowski A, Pekkan K. Mechanobiology and the microcirculation: cellular, nuclear and fluid mechanics. Microcirculation. 2010;17:179–191.
  • Bloom RJ, George JP, Celedon A, et al. Mapping local matrix remodeling induced by a migrating tumor cell using three-dimensional multiple-particle tracking. Biophys J. 2008;95:4077–4088.
  • Munevar S, Wang Y, Dembo M. Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. Biophys J. 2001;80:1744–1757.
  • Pan Z, Ghosh K, Liu Y, et al. Traction Stresses and Translational Distortion of the Nucleus During Fibroblast Migration on a Physiologically Relevant ECM Mimic. Biophys J. 2009;96:4286–4298.
  • Krause M, Wolf K. Cancer cell migration in 3D tissue: negotiating space by proteolysis and nuclear deformability. Cell Adh Migr. 2015;9:357–366.
  • Yavropoulou MP, Yovos JG. The molecular basis of bone mechanotransduction. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2016;16:221–236.
  • Lyon RC, Zanella F, Omens JH, et al. Mechanotransduction in cardiac hypertrophy and failure. Circ Res. 2015;116:1462–1476.
  • Uzer G, Rubin CT, Rubin J. Cell mechanosensitivity is enabled by the LINC nuclear complex. Mol Biol Rep. 2016;2:36–47.
  • Luke Y, Zaim H, Karakesisoglou I, et al. Nesprin-2 Giant (NUANCE) maintains nuclear envelope architecture and composition in skin. J Cell Sci. 2008;121:1887–1898.
  • Wilhelmsen K, Litjens SHM, Kuikman I, et al. Nesprin-3, a novel outer nuclear membrane protein, associates with the cytoskeletal linker protein plectin. J Cell Biol. 2005;171:799–810.