PseudoBase: a genomic visualization and exploration resource for the Drosophila pseudoobscura subgroup

References

• Sturtevant AH, Dobzhansky T. Inversions in the third chromosome of wild races of Drosophila pseudoobscura, and their use in the study of the history of the species. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1936;22:448–450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobzhansky T. Genetics of natural populations IX. Temporal changes in the composition of populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1943;28(2):162–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobzhansky T, Sturtevant AH. Inversions in the chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics. 1938;23(1):28–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewontin R, Hubby J. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseudobscura. Genetics. 1966;54(2):565–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller ZL, Koury SA, Phadnis N, et al. How chromosomal rearrangements shape adaptation and speciation: case studies in Drosophila pseudoobscura and its sibling species Drosophila persimilis. Mol Ecol. 2018;28(6):1283–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman L, Stathos A, Beardsley PM, et al. Chromosomal rearrangements and the genetics of reproductive barriers in Mimulus (monkey flowers). Evolution. 2013;67(9):2547–2560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann AA, Rieseberg LH. Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2008;39:21–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick M, Barrett B. Chromosome inversions, adaptive cassettes and the evolution of species’ ranges. Mol Ecol. 2015;24(9):2046–2055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick M, Barton N. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics. 2006;173(1):419–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor MA, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, et al. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2001;98(21):12084–12088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor MAF, Grams KL, Bertucci LA, et al. The genetics of reproductive isolation and the potential for gene exchange between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis via backcross hybrid males. Evolution. 2001;55:512–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KM, Burk LM, Henagan LM, et al. A test of the chromosomal rearrangement model of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution. 2004;58(8):1856–1860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang AS, Noor MAF. The genetics of hybrid male sterility between the allopatric species pair Drosophila persimilis and D. pseudoobscura bogotana: dominant sterility alleles in collinear autosomal regions. Genetics. 2007;176(1):343–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulathinal RJ, Stevison LS, Noor MAF. The genomics of speciation in Drosophila: diversity, divergence, and introgression estimated using low-coverage genome sequencing. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(7):e1000550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phadnis N, Orr H. A single gene causes both male sterility and segregation distortion in Drosophila hybrids. Science. 2009;323(5912):376–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckenbach AT, Wei YW, Liu H. Relationships in the Drosophila obscura species group, inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10(3):619–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korunes KL, Machado CA, Noor MA. Inversions shape the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis on multiple timescales. BioRxiv. 2019;842047. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1101/842047
   Google Scholar
• Manzano-Winkler B, McGaugh SE, Noor MAF. How hot are Drosophila hotspots? Examining recombination rate variation and associations with nucleotide diversity, divergence, and maternal age in Drosophila pseudoobscura. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e71582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaugh SE, Heil CSS, Manzano-Winkler B, et al. Recombination modulates how selection affects linked sites in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2012;10(11):e1001422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smukowski Heil CS, Ellison C, Dubin M, et al. Recombining without hotspots: A comprehensive evolutionary portrait of recombination in two closely related species of Drosophila. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7(10):2829–2842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtrog D, Charlesworth B. Reduced adaptation of a non-recombining neo-Y chromosome. Nature. 2002;416(6878):323–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan S, Wei KH, Nalley M, et al. De novo assembly of a young Drosophila Y chromosome using single-molecule sequencing and chromatin conformation capture. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(7):e2006348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller ZL, Leonard CJ, Young RE, et al. Ancestral polymorphisms explain the role of chromosomal inversions in speciation. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(7):e1007526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaugh SE, Noor MAF. Genomic impacts of chromosomal inversions in parapatric Drosophila species. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2012;367(1587):422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuk K, Manzano-Winkler B, Ritz KR, et al. Natural selection shapes variation in genome-wide recombination rate in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Curr Biol. 2020;30(8):1517–1528.E6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler Transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmond J, Goodman JL, Strelets VB, et al. FlyBase 2.0: the next generation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D759–D765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, et al. From FastQ data to high-confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;43(1):11.10.1–11.10.33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buels R, Yao E, Diesh CM, et al. JBrowse: A dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis. Genome Biol. 2016;17(66). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0924-1
   Google Scholar
• Kriventseva EV, Tegenfeldt F, Petty TJ, et al. OrthoDB v8: update of the hierarchical catalog of orthologs and the underlying free software. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D250–6. Epub 2014 Nov 26. PMID: 25428351; PMCID: PMC4383991
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richards S, Liu Y, Bettencourt BR, et al. Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution. Genome Res. 2005;15(1):1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noor JKF, Noor MAF. Finding selection in all the right places: a college genetics laboratory inquiry-based learning exercise. Genet Soc Am Peer-Reviewed Educ Portal. 2013;2013:1.
   Google Scholar