Advanced search
Publication Cover
Fly Volume 17, 2023 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,988
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methods and Technical Advances

A tissue dissociation method for ATAC-seq and CUT&RUN in Drosophila pupal tissues

Elli M. Bucherta Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAView further author information
,
Elizabeth A. Fogartya Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAView further author information
,
Christopher M. Uyeharab Deptartment of Biology, Department of Genetics, Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;c Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USAView further author information
,
Daniel J. McKayb Deptartment of Biology, Department of Genetics, Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USAView further author information
&
Laura A. Buttittaa Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5064-0650View further author information
ORCID Icon
Article: 2209481 | Received 10 Jan 2023, Accepted 28 Apr 2023, Published online: 21 May 2023

References

  • Wilczynski B, Furlong EE. Dynamic CRM occupancy reflects a temporal map of developmental progression. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:383.
  • Ahmad K, Spens AE. Separate polycomb response elements control chromatin state and activation of the vestigial gene. PLoS Genet. 2019;15:e1007877.
  • Davie K, Jacobs J, Atkins M, et al. Discovery of transcription factors and regulatory regions driving in vivo tumor development by ATAC-seq and FAIRE-seq open chromatin profiling. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1004994.
  • Uyehara CM, McKay DJ. Direct and widespread role for the nuclear receptor EcR in mediating the response to ecdysone in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:9893–11.
  • Flegel K, Sun D, Grushko O, et al. Live cell cycle analysis of Drosophila tissues using the attune acoustic focusing cytometer and Vybrant DyeCycle violet DNA stain. J Vis Exp. 2013;e50239. DOI:10.3791/50239-v
  • Corces MR, Trevino AE, Hamilton EG, et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat Methods. 2017;14:959–962.
  • Meers MP, Bryson TD, Henikoff JG, et al. Improved CUT&RUN chromatin profiling tools. Elife. 2019;8. DOI:10.7554/eLife.46314
  • Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120.
  • Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing readsCutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet journal. 2011;17:1. DOI:10.14806/ej.17.1.200
  • Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–359.
  • Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10. DOI:10.1093/gigascience/giab008
  • Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008;9:R137.
  • Ramirez F, Ryan DP, Gruning B, et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W160–165.
  • Amemiya HM, Kundaje A, Boyle AP. The ENCODE blacklist: identification of problematic regions of the genome. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9354.
  • Karolchik D, Hinrichs AS, Furey TS, et al. The UCSC Table Browser data retrieval tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D493–496.
  • Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–930.
  • Zhu LJ, Gazin C, Lawson ND, et al. ChIPpeakAnno: a Bioconductor package to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip data. BMC Bioinf. 2010;11:237.
  • Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12:996–1006.
  • Reed CT, Murphy C, Fristrom D. The ultrastructure of the differentiating pupal leg ofDrosophila melanogaster. Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol. 1975;178:285–302.
  • Ma Y, McKay DJ, Buttitta L. Changes in chromatin accessibility ensure robust cell cycle exit in terminally differentiated cells. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e3000378.
  • de la Cruz AF, Edgar BA. Flow cytometric analysis of Drosophila cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;420:373–389.
  • Fristrom JW, Doctor J, Fristrom DK, et al. The formation of the pupal cuticle by Drosophila imaginal discs in vitro. Dev Biol. 1982;91:337–350. DOI:10.1016/0012-1606(82)90040-9
  • Harris RE, Stinchfield MJ, Nystrom SL, et al. Damage-responsive, maturity-silenced enhancers regulate multiple genes that direct regeneration in Drosophila. Elife. 2020;9. DOI:10.7554/eLife.58305
  • Vizcaya-Molina E, Klein CC, Serras F, et al. Damage-responsive elements in Drosophila regeneration. Genome Res. 2018;28:1852–1866.
  • Uyehara CM, Nystrom SL, Niederhuber MJ, et al. Hormone-dependent control of developmental timing through regulation of chromatin accessibility. Genes Dev. 2017;31:862–875.
  • Loubiere V, Delest A, Thomas A, et al. Coordinate redeployment of PRC1 proteins suppresses tumor formation during Drosophila development. Nat Genet. 2016;48:1436–1442.
  • Papp B, Muller J. Histone trimethylation and the maintenance of transcriptional on and off states by trxG and PcG proteins. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2041–2054.
  • Niederhuber MJ, McKay DJ. Mechanisms underlying the control of dynamic regulatory element activity and chromatin accessibility during metamorphosis. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2021;43:21–28.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.