428
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
METHODOLOGICAL STUDIES

Distributional Analysis in Educational Evaluation: A Case Study from the New York City Voucher Program

, , &

REFERENCES

  • Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Angrist, J.D., Dynarski, S.M., Kane, T.J., & Pathak, P.A. (2011). Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston's charters and pilots. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 699–748.
  • Angrist, J., Bettinger, E., & Kremer, M. (2006). Long-term educational consequences of secondary school vouchers: Evidence from administrative records in Colombia. The American Economic Review, 96, 847–862.
  • Angrist, J.D., Dynarski, S.M., Kane, T.J., Pathak, P.A., & Walters, C.R. (2010). Inputs and impacts in charter schools: KIPP Lynn. The American Economic Review, 100, 239–243.
  • Angrist, J.D., Dynarski, S.M., Kane, T.J., Pathak, P.A., & Walters, C.R. (2012). Who benefits from KIPP? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 837–860.
  • Argys, L.M., Rees, D.I., & Brewer, D.J. (1996). Detracking America's schools: Equity at zero cost? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15, 623–645.
  • Barnard, J., Frangakis, C.E., Hill, J.L., & Rubin, D.B. (2003). Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 299–310.
  • Chakrabarti, R. (2013). Vouchers, public school response, and the role of incentives: Evidence from Florida. Economic Inquiry, 51, 500–526.
  • Chingos, M.M., & Peterson, P.E. (2012). The effects of school vouchers on college enrollment: Experimental evidence from New York City. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Chubb, J.E., & Moe, T.M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Coleman, J.S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public, Catholic, and private schools: The importance of community. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Cowen, J.M. (2008). School choice as a latent variable: Estimating the “complier average causal effect” of vouchers in Charlotte. Policy Studies Journal, 36, 301–315.
  • Cowen, J.M. (2012). Interpreting school choice effects: Do voucher experiments estimate the impact of attending private school? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5, 384–400.
  • Dobbie, W., Fryer, R.G., & Fryer, G., Jr. (2011). Are high-quality schools enough to increase achievement among the poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children's Zone. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3, 158–187.
  • Duncan, G.J., & Vandell, D.L. (2012, March). A conceptual approach to understanding treatment heterogeneity in human capital interventions. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.
  • Epple, D., Figlio, D., & Romano, R. (2004). Competition between private and public schools: Testing stratification and pricing predictions. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1215–1245.
  • Evans, W., & Schwab, R. (1995). Finishing high school and starting college: Do Catholic schools make a difference? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 941–974.
  • Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1980). Free to choose. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Greeley, A.M. (1982). Catholic high schools and minority students. Livingston, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Greene, J.P. (2001). Vouchers in Charlotte. Education Matters, 1, 55–60.
  • Greene, J.P., Howell, W.G., & Peterson, P.E. (1997). Lessons from the Cleveland scholarship program. Cambridge, MA: Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University.
  • Greene, J.P., Peterson, P.E., & Du, J. (1997). Effectiveness of school choice: The Milwaukee experiment. Cambridge, MA: Program in Education Policy and Governance and Center for American Political Studies, Harvard University.
  • Greene, J., Peterson, P., & Du, J. (1998). School choice in Milwaukee. Learning from School Choice, 1(2), 335–356.
  • Greene, J.P., & Winters, M.A. (2003). When schools compete: The effects of vouchers on Florida public school achievement. New York, NY: Center for Civic Innovation, Manhattan Institute.
  • Hartocollis, A. (1997, November 26). School voucher experiment will be extended and expanded. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/26/nyregion/school-voucher-experiment-will-be-extended-and-expanded.html
  • Hastings, J., Kane, T., & Staiger, D. (2005). Parental preferences and school competition: Evidence from a public school choice program (Working Paper No. 11805). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Hill, J.L., Rubin, D.B., & Thomas, N. (2000). The design of the New York School Choice Scholarships Program evaluation. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Research design: Donald Campbell's legacy (Vol., pp. 328–346). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hoffer, T., Greeley, A.M., & Coleman, J.S. (1985). Achievement growth in public and Catholic schools. Sociology of Education, 58, 74–97.
  • Hong, G., Corter, C., Hong, Y., & Pelletier, J. (2012). Differential effects of literacy instruction time and homogeneous ability grouping in Kindergarten classrooms: Who will benefit? Who will suffer? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 69–88.
  • Hoover, H.D., Dunbar, S.B., & Frisbie, D.A. (2013). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS_ Forms A, B, and C). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside. . Retrieved from http://www.riversidepublishing.com/products/itbs/details.html
  • Howell, W., & Peterson, P. (2000). School choice in Dayton, Ohio: An evaluation after 1 year. Paper prepared for the conference on charters, vouchers, and public education, Program on Education Policy and Governance, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  • Howell, W.G., Wolf, P.J., Campbell, D.E., & Peterson, P.E. (2002). School vouchers and academic performance: Results from three randomized field trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 191–217.
  • Hoxby, C.M., Murarka, S., & Kang, J. (2009). How New York City's charter schools affect achievement (No. 2). Cambridge, MA: New York City Charter Schools Evaluation Project.
  • Jin, H., Barnard, J., & Rubin, D.B. (2010). A modified general location model for noncompliance with missing data: Revisiting the New York City School Choice Scholarship Program using principal stratification. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 154–173.
  • Jin, H., & Rubin, D.B. (2009). Public schools versus private schools: Causal inference with partial compliance. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 24–45.
  • Krueger, A., & Zhu, P. (2004a). Another look at the New York City school voucher experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 658–698.
  • Krueger, A., & Zhu, P. (2004b). Inefficiency, subsample selection bias, and nonrobustness. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 718–728.
  • Kupermintz, H. (2002). The effects of vouchers on school improvement: Another look at the Florida data. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Ladd, H.F., & Fiske, E.B. (2003). Does competition improve teaching and learning? Evidence from New Zealand. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 97–112.
  • Lara, B., Mizala, A., Repetto, A. (2011). The effectiveness of private voucher education: Evidence from structural school switchers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 119–137.
  • Mayer, D.P., Peterson, P.E., Myers, D.E., Tuttle, C.C., & Howell, W.G. (2002). School choice in New York City after three years: An evaluation of the school choice scholarship program. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
  • McEwan, P.J., & Carnoy, M. (2000). The effectiveness and efficiency of private schools in Chile's voucher system. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 213–239.
  • Morgan, S.L. (2001). Counterfactuals, causal effect heterogeneity, and the Catholic school effect on learning. Sociology of Education, 74, 341–374.
  • Neal, D.A. (1997). The effects of Catholic secondary schooling on educational achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 98–123.
  • Peterson, P.E., & Howell, W.G. (2004). Efficiency, bias, and classification schemes: A response to Alan B. Krueger and Pei Zhu. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 699–717.
  • Peterson, P.E., Howell, W.G., & Greene, J.P. (1999). An evaluation of the Cleveland Voucher Program after two years. Cambridge, MA: Program on Education Policy and Governance, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
  • Peterson, P.E., Myers, D., & Howell, W.G. (1999). An evaluation of the Horizon Scholarship Program in the Edgewood Independent School District, San Antonio, Texas: The first year. Cambridge, MA: Program on Education Policy and Governance, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
  • Rouse, C.E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee parental choice program. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 553–602.
  • Steinberg, J. (1997a, February 4). Giuliani sees tuition plan set for fall. The New York Times. Retrieved from . http://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/04/nyregion/giuliani-sees-tuition-plan-set-for-fall.html
  • Steinberg, J. (1997b, May 13). Students chosen for grants to attend private schools. The New York Times. Retrieved from . http://www.nytimes.com/1997/05/13/nyregion/students-chosen-for-grants-to-attend-private-schools.html
  • Witte, J.F. (1998). The Milwaukee voucher experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20, 229–251.
  • Wolf, P.J., Howell, W.G., & Peterson, P.E. (2000). School choice in Washington, DC: An evaluation after one year. Cambridge, MA: Program on Educational Policy and Governance, Harvard University.
  • Wolf, P.J., Kisida, B., Gutmann, B., Puma, M., Eissa, N., & Rizzo, L. (2013). School vouchers and student outcomes: Experimental evidence from Washington, DC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(2), 246270.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.