Why Do We Find These Effects? An Examination of Mediating Pathways Explaining the Effects of School Turnaround

References

• Aladjem, D. K., LeFloch, K. C., Zhang, Y., Kurki, A., Boyle, A., Taylor, J. E., Herrmann, S., Uekawa, K., Thomsen, K., & Fashola, O. (2006). Models Matter–The Final Report of the National Longitudinal Evaluation of Comprehensive School Reform. American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Anrig, G. (2015). Lessons from school improvement grants that worked. The Century Foundation. http://www.tcf.org/blog/detail/lessons-from-schoolimprovement-grants-that-worked
   Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berends, M., Bodilly, S. J., & Kirby, S. N. (2002). Facing the challenges of whole-school reform: New American Schools after a decade. Rand Corporation. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=IAFT_Ln9JwcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3&dq=berends+kirby+facing+the+challenges&ots=cy3UELrPXl&sig=-coXvQr4H_wXxWGbvKVG92sCxfU
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla, S., & Dee, T. (2017). The effects of school reform under NCLB waivers: evidence from focus schools in Kentucky. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnette, D. II. (2015). Philanthropic grant for $10 million ensures Memphis iZone expansion. Chalkbeat. https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/tn/2015/09/16/philanthropic-grant-for-10-million-ensures-memphis-izone-expansion/
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, A., Guenther, W., Belfiore, G., & Lash, D. (2007). The Turnaround Challenge: Why America’s Best Opportunity to Dramatically Improve Student Achievement Lies in Our Worst-Performing Schools. Mass Insight Education (NJ1).
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., & Lavertu, S. (2018). School improvement grants in Ohio: Effects on student achievement and school administration. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(3), 287–315. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718760218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell, S. E., Hoekstra, M., & Kuka, E. (2018). The long-run effects of disruptive peers. American Economic Review, 108(11), 3377–3415. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, H. (2009). How accountability pressure on failing schools affects student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 93(9–10), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. (2012). School turnarounds: Evidence from the 2009 stimulus. National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 433–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, L. L., Pham, L. D., Henry, G. T., Corcoran, S. P., & Zimmer, R. (2022). Who leads turnaround schools? Characteristics of principals in Tennessee’s achievement school district and innovation zones. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(2), 258–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X211055702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, S. M., & Weiner, J. M. (2017). The Rhode to turnaround: The impact of waivers to no child left behind on school performance. Educational Policy, 33(4), 555–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragoset, L., Thomas, J., Herrmann, M., Deke, J., James-Burdumy, S., Graczewski, C., Boyle, A., Upton, R., Tanenbaum, C., & Giffin, J. (2017). School improvement grants: Implementation and effectiveness. NCEE 2017-4013. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer, J. L., & Egan, C. (2018). The ties that bind: Building civic capacity for the Tennessee achievement school district. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 928–964. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218763088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer, J. L., Massell, D., Lenhoff, S. W., Larbi-Cherif, A., Egan, C., Taylor, J. E., Ison, A., Deleveaux, J., & Millington, Z. (2020). District-led school turnaround: Aiming for ambitious and equitable instruction in Shelby County’s iZone. CPRE Research Report# RR 2020-1. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, B., Booker, T. K., & Goldhaber, D. (2009). Boosting student achievement: The effect of comprehensive school reform on student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709333886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Heissel, J. A., & Ladd, H. F. (2018). School turnaround in North Carolina: A regression discontinuity analysis. Economics of Education Review, 62, 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., & Harbatkin, E. (2018). The next generation of school reform: Improving the lowest performing schools without disrupting the status quo [Paper presentation]. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., Pham, L. D., Kho, A., & Zimmer, R. (2020). Peeking into the black box of school turnaround: A formal test of mediators and suppressors. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(2), 232–256.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., Zimmer, R., Attridge, J., Kho, A., & Viano, S. (2014). Teacher and student migration in and out of Tennessee’s achievement school district. Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation & Development. https://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/TERA/files/ASD_Teacher_Student_Migration.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools. IES practice guide. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED501241
   Google Scholar
• Horng, E. L. (2009). Teacher tradeoffs: Disentangling teachers’ preferences for working conditions and student demographics. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 690–717. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208329599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., & Tingley, D. (2010). A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 15(4), 309–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, N., Lewis-LaMonica, K., & Perigo, M. (2017). School district innovation zones: A new wave of district-led efforts to improve economic mobility (p. 46). The Bridgespan Group. https://www.bridgespan.org/bridgespan/Images/articles/school-district-innovation-zones/school-district-innovation-zones-a-new-wave-of-district-led-efforts-to-improve-economic-mobility.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. K., & Bruegmann, E. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 114(10), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211401004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., Marinell, W. H., & Shen-Wei Yee, D. (2016). School organizational contexts, teacher turnover, and student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1411–1449. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216667478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., Papay, J. P., Johnson, S. M., Charner-Laird, M., Ng, M., & Reinhorn, S. (2015). Educating amid uncertainty: The organizational supports teachers need to serve students in high-poverty, urban schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 753–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15607617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutash, J., Nico, E., Gorin, E., Rahmatullah, S., & Tallant, K. (2010). The school turnaround field guide. Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/pages/turnaround-actors-school-turnaround-field-guide.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Lachlan-Haché, J., Naik, M., & Casserly, M. (2012). The school improvement grant rollout in America’s great city schools: School improvement grants. Council of the Great City Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711398128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Floch, K., O’Day, J., Birman, B., Hurlburt, S., Nayfack, M., Halloran, C., Boyle, A., Brown, S., Mercard-Garcia, D., Rosenberg, L., Hulsey, L., & Wei, T. (2016). Case studies of schools receiving school improvement grants: Final report [Indexes; Offices]. NCEE. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20164002/index.asp
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2008). Turnaround schools and the leadership they require. Canadian Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 44–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje8003_4
   Google Scholar
• Mass Insight (2010). School turnaround models emerging turnaround strategies and results.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, C. V., & Hambrick Hitt, D. (2017). School turnaround principals: What does initial research literature suggest they are doing to be successful? Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 22(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2016.1242070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., & Meyers, C. V. (2009). Rebuilding organizational capacity in turnaround schools: Insights from the corporate, government, and non-profit sectors. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208098162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papay, J., Kraft, M. A., & James, J. (2021). Operator versus partner: A case study of blueprint school network’s model for school turnaround.
   Google Scholar
• Peurach, D. J., Glazer, J. L., & Winchell Lenhoff, S. (2016). The developmental evaluation of school improvement networks. Educational Policy, 30(4), 606–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814557592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, L. D., Henry, G. T., Kho, A., & Zimmer, R. (2020). Sustainability and maturation of school turnaround: A multi-year evaluation of Tennessee’s achievement school district and local innovation zones. AERA Open, 6(2), 233285842092284. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420922841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portin, B. S., Knapp, M. S., Dareff, S., Feldman, S., Russell, F. A., Samuelson, C., & Yeh, T. L. (2009). Leadership for learning improvement in urban schools. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J. (2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 825–852. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redding, C., & Nguyen, T. D. (2020). The relationship between school turnaround and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 493–519. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720949513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, J. K., & Malen, B. (2003). The human costs of education reform: The case of school reconstitution. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(5), 635–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03257298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, J. K., & Malen, B. (2010). School reconstitution as an education reform strategy. National Education Association. http://199.223.128.58/assets/docs/School_Reconstruction_and_an_Education_Reform_Strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schueler, B. E., Asher, C. A., Larned, K. E., Mehrotra, S., & Pollard, C. (2020). Improving low-performing schools: A meta-analysis of impact evaluation studies [Paper presentation]. 2020 APPAM Fall Research Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Schueler, B. E., Goodman, J. S., & Deming, D. J. (2017). Can states take over and turn around school districts? Evidence from Lawrence. Massachusetts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716685824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M. P., Allensworth, E., & Johnson, D. W. (2011). Student and teacher safety in Chicago public schools: The roles of community context and school social organization. ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Strunk, K. O., Marsh, J. A., Hashim, A. K., & Bush-Mecenas, S. (2016). Innovation and a return to the status: A mixed-methods study of school reconstitution. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(3), 549–577. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716642517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M., Penner, E. K., & Loeb, S. (2017). Resource- and approach-driven multidimensional change: Three-year effects of school improvement grants. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217695790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education (2010). Race to the top application for initial funding. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/phase1-applications/tennessee.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tennessee Department of Education (2013). Tennessee Department of Education to grant signing and retention bonuses to highly effective teachers. https://www.tn.gov/news/2013/5/8/tennessee-department-of-education-to-grant-signing-and-retention-bonuses-to.html
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. L., Brown, K. M., Townsend, L. W., Henry, G. T., & Fortner, C. K. (2011). Turning around North Carolina’s lowest achieving schools (2006–2010). Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation–North Carolina. http://cerenc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DST_1st-year-Report_FINAL_12-05-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Viano, S., Pham, L. D., Henry, G. T., Kho, A., & Zimmer, R. (2018). Push or pull: School-level factors that influence teacher mobility in turnaround schools. TERA Working Paper. https://peabody.vanderbilt.edu/TERA/TERA_Working_Paper_2019-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yatsko, S., Lake, R., Nelson, E. C., & Bowen, M. (2012). Tinkering toward transformation: A look at federal school improvement grant implementation. Center on Reinventing Public Education.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, R., Henry, G. T., & Kho, A. (2017). The effects of school turnaround in Tennessee’s achievement school district and innovation zones. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 670–696. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717705729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollo, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar