(In)equity in athletics: U.S. antidiscrimination law and the white, middle-class advantage

References

• Adams, C., & Leavitt, S. (2018). ‘It’s just girls’ hockey’: Troubling progress narratives in girls’ and women’s sport. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 53(2), 152–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690216649207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Associated Press. (2007). Penn State coach, ex-player reach settlement. ESPN. http://www.espn.com/ncw/news/story?id = 2755039.
   Google Scholar
• Bell Jr., D. A. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93(3), 518–533. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, C. G., Roberts, D., & Rubinowitz, L. S. (2006). Race and gender in the law review. Northwestern University Law Review, 100(1), 27–70. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/illlr100&i=45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. J., & Connolly, C. (2010). The role of law in promoting women in elite athletics: An examination of four nations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 45(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690209353088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka. (1954). 347 U.S. 483.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheslock, J. (2008). Who’s playing college sports? Money, race and gender. Women’s Sport Foundation. http://www.womenssportsfoundation.org.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. J. (1997). Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: The radical potential of queer politics? GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and gay Studies, 3(4), 437–465. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-3-4-437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen v. Brown University. (1996). 101 F.3d 155 1st Cir.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problem, 33(6), S14–S32. https://doi.org/10.2307/800672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2005). The politics of Black feminist thought (2nd ed). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooky, C., Wachs, F., Messner, M., & Dworkin, S. (2010). It’s not about the game: Don Imus, race, class, gender and sexuality in contemporary media. Sociology of Sport Journal, 27(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.27.2.139
   Google Scholar
• Craig v. Boren. (1976). 429 U.S. 190.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101(7), 1331–1387. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory: An introduction (3rd ed). New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donnor, J. K. (2011). Moving beyond brown: Race and education after parents v. Seattle School District No. 1. Teachers College Record, 113(4), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas, M. J. (2011). A cultural political economy of school desegregation in Seattle. Teachers College Record, 113(4), 703–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, S. L., & Cooky, C. (2012). Sport, sex segregation, and sex testing: Critical reflections on this unjust marriage. The American Journal of Bioethics, 12(7), 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2012.680545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. R. (2010). Why sport? The development of sport as a policy issue in Title IX of the education amendments of 1972. Journal of Policy History, 22(3), 300–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898030610000126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Equity in Athletics v. Department of Education. (2011). 639 F.3d 91 4th Circuit.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, S. (2008). Title IX and African American female athletes. In M. Lomax, & K. Shropshire (Eds.), Sports and the racial divide: African American and latino experience in an era of change (pp. 126–145). University of Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., & McClearen, J. (2020). Transgender athletes and the queer art of athletic failure. Communication & Sport, 8(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479518823207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, A., & Wilson, M. (2009). The resegregation of public schools. Children & Schools, 31(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/31.2.79
   Google Scholar
• Gratz v. Bollinger. (2003). 539 U.S. 244.
   Google Scholar
• Green, T. L., & Gooden, M. A. (2016). The shaping of policy: Exploring the context, contradictions, and contours of privilege in Milliken v. Bradley, over 40 years later. Teachers College Record, 118(3), 1–30. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/10 .1177/016146811611800306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grutter v. Bollinger. (2003). 539 U.S. 306.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, A. (2016). Intersectionality: An intellectual history. Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris v. Portland. (2006). 1:05-CV-2648. U.S. District Court M.D. Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Hattery, A. (2012). They play like girls: Gender and race (In)equity in NCAA sports. Wake Forest Journal of Law & Policy, 2(1), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1179/ssa.2007.1.3.249
   Google Scholar
• Hextrum, K. (2018). The hidden curriculum of college athlete recruitment. Harvard Educational Review, 88(3), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-88.3.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hextrum, K. (2020a). Bigger, faster, stronger: How racist and sexist ideologies persist in college sports. Gender and Education, 32(8), 1053–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2019.1632418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hextrum, K. (2020b). Segregation, innocence, and protection: The institutional conditions that maintain whiteness in college sports. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(4), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hextrum, K. (2020c). Amateurism revisited: How US college athletic recruitment favors middle-class athletes. Sport, Education, and Society, 25(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2018.1547962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hextrum, K. (2021a). Special admission: How college sports recruitment favors white suburban athletes. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hextrum, K. (2021b). White property interests in college athletic admissions. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/01937235211015352
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. South End.
   Google Scholar
• La Noue, G. R. (2005). Michigan's homework assignment. Academic Questions, 18(2), 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mathewson, A. D. (1995). Black women, gender equity and the function at the junction. Marquette Sports Law Journal, 6(1), 239–266. http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/sportslaw
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. (2004). On patriarchs and losers: Rethinking men’s interests. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 48(1), 74–88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41035593
   Google Scholar
• Messner, M. (2011). Gender ideologies, youth sports, and the production of soft essentialism. Sociology of Sport Journal, 28(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.28.2.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, M., & Solomon, N. M. (2007). Social justice and men’s interests: The case of Title IX. The Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 31(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723507301048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (2003). From class to race: Essays in white Marxism and Black radicalism. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, A. N., & Braddock IIJ. H. (2016). Sex segregation in sports: Why separate is not equal. ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• National Federation of State High School Associations [NFHS]. (2020). 2018–2019 high school athletics participation survey results. NFHS.
   Google Scholar
• National Wrestling Coaches Association v. Department of Education. (2004). 383 F.3d 1047 D.C. Circuit.
   Google Scholar
• Neal v. Board of Trustees of California State Universities. (1999). 189 F.3d 763. CA.
   Google Scholar
• Newhall, K. E., & Buzuvis, E. E. (2008). (E)Racing Jennifer Harris: Sexuality and race, law and discourse in Harris v. Portland. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 32(4), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723508324081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyong’o, T. (2010). The unforgivable transgression of being Caster Semenya. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory, 20(1), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/07407701003589501
   Google Scholar
• Office of Civil Rights [OCR]. (1979). A policy interpretation: Title IX and intercollegiate athletics. Federal Register, 44(239), https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9interp.html.
   Google Scholar
• Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District. (2007). 551 U.S. 701.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, B. (2006). At James Madison, Title IX is satisfied, but the students are not. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/07/sports/othersports/07madison.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, M., Dawkins, M., & Braddock, J. (2012). Race and gender equity in sports: Have white and African American females benefited equally from Title IX? American Behavioral Scientist, 56(1), 1581–1603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212458282
   Google Scholar
• Razack, S., & Joseph, J. (2020). Misogynoir in women’s sport media: Race, nation, and diaspora in the representation of Naomi Osaka. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 291–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redden, E. (2006a). Gender equity of finances? Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/10/03/jmu.
   Google Scholar
• Redden, E. (2006b). Rally for Title IX Changes. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/11/03/jmu.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts v. Colorado State Board. of Agriculture. (1993). 998 F.2d 824, 10th Circuit.
   Google Scholar
• Sabo, D., & Veliz, P. (2008). Go out and play: Youth sports in America. Women’s Sports Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J. L., Cabrera, N. L., & Fosnacht, K. J. (2010). Is “race-neutral” really race-neutral?: Disparate impact towards underrepresented minorities in post-209 UC system admissions. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolla, R. (2011). Competing conceptions of equality. New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Staurowsky, E. J., Murray, K., Puzio, M., & Quagliariello, J. (2013). Revisiting James Madison University: A case analysis of program restructuring following so called ‘Title IX’ cuts. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 6(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.1123/jis.6.1.96
   Google Scholar
• Staurowsky, E. J., Watanabe, N., Cooper, J., Cooky, C., Lough, N., Paule-Koba, A., Pharr, J., Williams, S., Cummings, S., Issokson-Silver, K., & Snyder, M. (2020). Chasing equity: The triumphs, challenges, and opportunities in sports for girls and women. Women’s Sports Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Suggs, W. (2005). A place on the team: The triumph and tragedy of Title IX. Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, C. F. (2011). Gender verification and gender policies in elite sport: Eligibility and “fair play.”. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 35(4), 400–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723511426293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theune, F. (2016). The shrinking presence of Black female student-athletes at Historically Black colleges and universities. Sociology of Sport Journal, 33(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2015-0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. (1972). 20 U.S.C. §1681-1688.
   Google Scholar
• Toffoletti, K., & Thorpe, H. (2018). The athletic labour of femininity: The branding and consumption of global celebrity sportswomen on Instagram. Journal of Consumer Culture, 18(2), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540517747068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travers, A. (2013). Thinking the unthinkable: Imagining an ‘Un-American,’ girl-friendly, women-and trans-inclusive alternative for baseball. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 37(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723512455926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1964). Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Definitions. SEC 2000e [Section 701]. https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, E., & Roessner, A. (2018). Forgotten and left behind: Political apathy and privilege at Title IX’s 40th anniversary. Communication & Sport, 6(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479516676577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar