1,104
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Harnessing the Power of Community-Based Participatory Research: Examining Knowledge, Action, and Consciousness in the PROUD Study

, , , , , & show all

References

  • BarlowC. A., & HurlockD. (2012). Group dynamics in a community-based participatory research photovoice project with exited sex trade workers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 132–151.
  • BilodeauA., LapierreS., & MarchandY. (2003). Le partenariat: Comment ca marche? Mieux s'outiller pour réussir. Montreal, Canada: Direction de santé publique.
  • ButterfossF. D. (2006). Process evaluation for community participation. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 323–340.
  • CaineK. J., SalomonsM. J., & SimmonsD. (2007). Partnerships for social change in the Canadian North: Revisiting the insider–outsider dialectic. Development and Change, 38, 447–471.
  • CampbellC., & DeaconH. (2006). Unravelling the contexts of stigma: From internalization to resistance to change. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16(6), 411–417.
  • ChangC. (2010). Evaluation and adaptations of a community-based participatory research partnership in San Francisco's Chinatown. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from UMI Dissertations Publishing (3413544).
  • ChiuL. F. (2008). Engaging communities in health intervention research/practice. Critical Public Health, 20(1), 117–127.
  • CookeB. (2004). Rules of thumb for participatory change agents. In S.Hickey & G.Mohan (Eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development (pp. 424–455). London, England: Zed Books.
  • CrabtreeB. F., & MillerW. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.
  • EderM. M., Carter-EdwardsL., HurdT. C., RumalaB. B., & WallersteinN. (2013). A logic model for community engagement within the Clinical and Translational Science Awards consortium: Can we measure what we model?Academic Medicine, 88(10), 1430–1436.
  • GaventaJ., & CornwallA. (2001). Power and knowledge. In P.Reason & H.Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 70–80). London, England: Sage.
  • GaventaJ., & CornwallA. (2006). Challenging the boundaries of the possible: Participation, knowledge and power. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 37(6), 12–128.
  • GeertzC. (1983). Local knowledge. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • GutaA., FlickerS., & RocheB. (2013). Governing through community allegiance: A qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 432–451.
  • HallB. L. (1992). From margins to centre? The development and purpose of participatory research. American Sociologist, 23, 15–28.
  • HislopD. (2004). The paradox of communities of practice: Knowledge sharing between communities. In P.Hildreth & C.Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice (pp. 36–46). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
  • IsraelB. A., SchulzA. J., ParkerE. A., & BeckerA. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Reviews of Public Health, 19, 173–202.
  • KhodyakovD., StockdaleS., JonesA., MangoJ., JonesF., & LizaolaE. (2012). On measuring community participation in research. Health Education and Behaviour, 40(3), 346–354.
  • LaveleeD. C., WilliamsC. J., TamborE. S., & DeverkaP. A. (2012). Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success?Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 1(5), 397–407.
  • LazarusL., ShawA., LeBlancS., MartinA., MarshallZ., WeersinkK., … and the PROUD Community Advisory Committee (2014). Establishing a community-based participatory research partnership among people who use drugs in Ottawa: The PROUD cohort study. Harm Reduction Journal, 11, 26.
  • LinnanL., & StecklerA. (2002). Process evaluation and public health interventions: An overview. In A.Steckler & L.Linnan (Eds.), Process evaluation in public health interventions and research (pp. 1–23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • LogieC., JamesL., TharaoW., & LoutfyM. R. (2012). Opportunities, ethical challenges, and lessons learned from working with peer research assistants in a multi-method HIV community-based research study in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 7(4), 10–19.
  • MahajanA. P., SaylesJ. N., PatelV. A., RemienR. H., OrtizD., SzekeresG., & CoatesT. J. (2008). Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: A review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward. AIDS, 22(S2), S67–S79.
  • MarekL. I., BrockD. J. P., & SavlaJ. (2014). Evaluating collaboration for effectiveness: conceptualization and measurement. American Journal of Evaluation. doi:10.1177/1098214014531068.
  • MinklerM. (2000). Using participatory action research to build healthy communities. Public Health Report, 115(2/3), 191–197.
  • MohanG. (1999). Not so distant, not so strange: The personal and the political in participatory research. Ethics, Place and Environment, 2(1), 41–54.
  • MorgenlanderK. H., TsaiH. -L., SchenkenL. L., HeronD. E., KlewienB., ChyongchiouJ. L., … McNellyS. L. (2009). Evaluation of formative development in the Neighborhood Cancer Care Cooperative. Social Work in Public Health, 24(4), 330–354.
  • National Institutes of Health. (2005). Theory at a glance: A guide for health promotion practice. (2nd ed., NIH publication 05-3896)Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute.
  • ParkerE. A., SchulzA. J., IsraelB. A., & HollisR. (1998). Eastside Village Health Worker partnership: Community-based health advisor intervention in an urban area. Health Education and Behavior, 25, 24–45.
  • ParkerR., & AggletonP. (2003). HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: A conceptual framework and implication for action. Social Science and Medicine, 57(1), 13–24.
  • PlumbM., CollinsN., CordeiroJ. N., & Kavanagh-LynchM. (2008). Assessing process and outcomes: Evaluating community-based participatory research. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 2(2), 87–97.
  • RhodesS. D., MalowR. M., & JollyC. (2010). Community-based participatory research (CBPR): A new and not-so-new approach to HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and treatment. AIDS Education and Prevention, 22(3), 173–183.
  • RhodesT. (2002). The risk environment: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13(2), 85–94.
  • RocheB., GutaA., & FlickerS. (2011). Peer research in action 1: Models of practice. Toronto, Canada: Wellesley Institute.
  • RossiP. H., LipseyM. W., & FreemanH. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • SchulzA., IsraelB., & LantzP. (2003). Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community-based participatory research partnerships. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26, 249–262.
  • SumartojoE. (2000). Structural factors in HIV prevention: Concepts, examples, and implications for research. AIDS, 14, S3–S10.
  • WallersteinN., & DuranB. (2008). The theoretical, historical, and practice roots of CBPR. In M.Minkler & N. B.Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes (pp. 371–392). San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.