Sociocultural Factors Affecting Unplanned Deliveries at Home: A Community-Based Case Control Study

References

• Addai, I. (2000). Determinants of use of maternal-child health services in rural Ghana. Journal of Biosocial Science, 32, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akın, A., & Özvarı¸, Ş. B. (2002). Türkiye'de Doğum ve Doğum sonu hizmetlerden yararlanma [Use of delivery services and postnatal care services in Turkey]. In A. Akın (Ed.), Türkiye'de Ana Sağlığı, Aile Planlaması Hizmetleri ve İsteyerek Dü¸ükler. Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Ara¸tırması 1998 İleri Analiz Sonuçları (pp. 248–300). Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University, Türkiye Aile Sağlığı ve Planlaması Vakfı, and United Nations Population Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Bolam, A., Manadhar, S. D., Sheresta, P., Ellis, M., Malla, K., & Costello, M. (1998). Factors affecting home delivery in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Health Policy and Planning, 13, 152–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boratav, H. F. (2002). Ku¸tepe Gençliği: Pencereden Gördüklerim [Ku¸tepe youth: What I saw from the window]. In G. Kazgan (Ed.), Ku¸tepe gençlik ara¸tırması (pp. 119–153). Istanbul, Turkey: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
   Google Scholar
• Catak, B., Ikiisik, H., Kartal, S. B., Oner, C., Uluç, H. H., & Seğmen, O. (2012). Evaluation of prenatal care in Istanbul: A population based study. Perinatal Journal, 20, 126–134. doi:10.2399/prn.12.0203003.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, Y., & Hotchkiss, D. R. (2000). The socio-economic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Turkey. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1797–1806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., Bapat, U., Shah, N., Chordhekar, L., Joshi, W., & Osrin, D. (2010). Prospective study of determinants and costs of home births in Mumbai slums. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10, 38–43. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declercq, E., MacDorman, M. F., & Menacker, F. (2010). Characteristics of planned and unplanned home births in 19 states. Obsterics & Gynecology, 116, 93–99. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e21f6d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedeoğlu, S. (2000). Toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri açısından Türkiye'de aile ve kadın emeği [Women's labor and family in Turkey in terms of gender]. Toplum ve Bilim Dergisi, 86, 139–171.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrysh, S., & Campell, O. (2009). Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 34, e1–18. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-34.
   Google Scholar
• Garces, A., McClure, M. E., Chomba, E., Patel, A., Pahsa, O., Tshefu, A., … Goldenberg, R. L. (2012). Home birth attendants in low income countries: Who are they and what do they do. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 34, 1–9. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-34.
   Google Scholar
• Glei, D. A., Goldman, N., & Rodriguez, G. (2003). Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: does obstetrical need matter? Social Science and Medicine, 57, 2447–2463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2009). Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2008. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, State Planning Organization and the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. (2014). Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2013. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, T.R. Ministry of Development and the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. B., & Covello, V. T. (1987). The social and cultural construction of risk: Essays on risk selection and perception. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Karpat, K. (1976). The Gecekondu, rural migration and urbanization. London, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kıray, M. (1985). Metropolitan city and the Chaning family. In T. Erder (Ed.), Family in Turkish society (pp. 259–274). Ankara, Turkey: Sosyal Bilimler Derneği.
   Google Scholar
• Kukulu, K., & Öncel, S. (2009). Factors influencing women's decision to have a home birth in rural Turkey. Midwifery, 25, 32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiferaw, S., Spigt, M., Godefrooij, M., Melkamu, Y., & Tekie, M. (2013). Why do women prefer home births in Ethiopia? BMC Pregnancy and Child Birth, 13, 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siziya, S., Muula, A. S., & Rudatsikira, E. (2009). Socio-economic factors associated with delivery assisted by traditional birth attendants in Iraq 2000. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 9, 1–5. doi:10.1186/1472-698X-9-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephenson, R., & Tsui, A. O. (2002). Contextual influence on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India. Studies in Family Planning, 33, 309–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezcan, S., & Eryurt, M. A. (2006). Türkiye'de iç göç ve çocuk sağlığı [Domestic migration and child health in Turkey]. Turkish Journal of Population Studies, 7, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of Health, General Directorate of Mother, Child and Family Planning. (2009). Antenatal care management guide. Retrieved from http://www.asm.gov.tr/UploadGenelDosyalar/Dosyalar/143/E%C4%9E%C4%B0T%C4%B0M/25_01_2011_15_42_40.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute. (2013). Turkey's statistical yearbook 2012. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Statistical Institute Printing Division.
   Google Scholar
• Vedam, S. (2003). Home birth versus hospital birth: Questioning the quality of the evidence on safety. Birth, 30, 57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar