References
- Da Via, E. (2012). Seed diversity, farmers’ rights, and the politics of re-peasantization. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19, 229–242.
- GRAIN. (2009). NERICA – Another trap for small farmers in Africa. Retrieved from http://www.grain.org/article/entries/111-nerica-another-trap-for-small-farmers-in-africa
- Holt-Gimenez, E., Altieri, M., & Rosset, P. (2006, October). Ten reasons why the Rockefeller and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations’ alliance for another Green Revolution will not solve the problems of poverty and hunger in sub-Saharan Africa. Food First Policy Brief No. 12. Retrieved from www.foodfirst.org
- IRIN. (2008, November 6). Gambia: Can farmers axe rice imports through ‘Nerica’? Retrieved from http://www.irinnews.org/report/81338/gambia-can-farmers-axe-rice-imports-through-nerica
- Kijima, Y., Otsuka, K., & Sserunkuuma, D. (2011). An inquiry into constraints on a Green Revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of NERICA rice in Uganda. World Development, 39, 77–86.10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.06.010
- Kloppenburg, J. (2010). Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: Biological open source and the recovery of seed sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10, 367–388.10.1111/(ISSN)1471-0366
- McGuire, S. (2007). Vulnerability in farmer seed systems: Farmer practices for coping with seed insecurity for Sorghum in eastern Ethiopia. Economic Botany, 61, 211–222.10.1663/0013-0001(2007)61[211:VIFSSF]2.0.CO;2
- Moseley, W. G., Carney, J., & Becker, L. (2010). Neoliberal policy, rural livelihoods, and urban food security in West Africa: A comparative study of The Gambia, Cote d’Ivoire, and Mali. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 5774–5779.10.1073/pnas.0905717107
- Sperling, L., & McGuire, S. (2010). Understanding and strengthening informal seed markets. Experimental Agriculture, 46, 119–136.10.1017/S0014479709991074
- Stone, G. (2002). Both sides now: Fallacies in the genetic-modification wars, implications for developing countries, and anthropological perspectives. Current Anthropology, 43, 611–630.10.1086/ca.2002.43.issue-4