‘Yes, I do belong’: the women who stay in engineering

REFERENCES

• Anderson, Kevin J., Sandra S. Courter, Tom McGlamery, Traci M. Nathans-Kelly, and Christine G. Nicometo. “Understanding Engineering Work and Identity: A Cross-case Analysis of Engineers Within Six Firms.” Engineering Studies 2, no. 3 (2010): 153–74. doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.519772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (APESMA). Women in the Professions: Survey Report. Melbourne: Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ayre, Mary, Julie E. Mills, and Judith Gill. “Not All Women Leave: Reflections on a Cohort of ‘Stayers’ in Civil Engineering.” Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE annual conference, Vancouver, Canada, on CD Rom, June 26–29, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bagilhole, Barbara, Abigail Powell, Sarah Barnard, and Andrew Dainty. Researching Cultures in Science, Engineering and Technology: An Analysis of Current and Past Literature. Bradford: UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Buse, Kathleen. Why They Stay: The Ideal Selves of Persistent Women Engineers. Doctor of Management Qualitative Research Paper. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve Univ., 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Buse, Kathleen. “Why They Stay: Individual Factors Predicting Career Commitment for Women Engineers.” Paper presented at the first international conference on engaged management scholarship, Cleveland, OH, June 2–5 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cech, Erin, Brian Rubineau, Susan Silbey, and Caroll Seron. “Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering.” American Sociological Review 76, no. 5 (2011): 641–66. doi: 10.1177/0003122411420815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science Engineering and Technology Development (CAWMSET). Land of Plenty: Diversity as America's Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology. Arlington: Virginia National Science Foundation, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Directorate General for Research. Creating Cultures of Success for Women Engineers. Final Report of the WomEng Project. Brussels: European Commission, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. “‘Nuts and Bolts and People’: Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities.” Social Studies of Science 37, no. 3 (2007): 331–56. doi: 10.1177/0306312706072175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. “Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. I. Observations from the Field.” Engineering Studies 1, no. 1 (2009a): 3–18. doi: 10.1080/19378620902721322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Wendy. “Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. II. Gender In/Authenticity and the In/Visibility Paradox.” Engineering Studies 1, no. 3 (2009b): 169–89. doi: 10.1080/19378620903225059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouad, Nadya A., and Romila Singh. Stemming the Tide: Why Women Leave Engineering. Center for the Study of the Workplace Report. Milwaukee: Univ. of Wisconsin, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Frehill, Lisa M. “SWE Retention Study and Work/Life Balance.” SWE: Magazine of the Society of Women Engineers (Fall 2009): 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Judith, Julie E. Mills, Suzanne Franzway, and Rhonda Sharp. “Oh You Must be Very Clever! High-achieving Women, Professional Power and the Ongoing Negotiation of Workplace Identity.” Gender and Education 20, no. 3 (2008): 223–36. doi: 10.1080/09540250801968990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewlett, Sylvia A., Carolyn B. Luce, Lisa J. Servon, Laura Sherbin, Peggy Shiller, Eytan Sosnovich, and Karen Sumberg. The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering and Technology. Harvard Business Review (HBR) Report, Harvard. Cambridge, MA: Center for Work-Life Policy, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Roxanne. “Are the Predictors of Women's Persistence in STEM Painting the Full Picture? A Series of Comparative Case Studies.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 3, no. 3 (2011): 547–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Jennifer. Why do Women Leave Science and Engineering? Montreal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kaspura, Andre. The Engineering Profession: A Statistical Overview. Canberra: Engineers Australia, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kaspura, Andre. The Engineers Australia Survey of Working Environment and Engineering Careers, 2012. Canberra: Engineers Australia, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli, Melissa, and Martina Calais. “Painting the Picture – a Statistical Update on Women in Engineering in Australia.” Paper presented at the 15th conference of women engineers and scientists (ICWES), Adelaide, Australia, 19–22 July 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Julie E., Wency Bastalich, Suzanne Franzway, Judith Gill, and Rhonda Sharp. “Engineering in Australia: An Uncomfortable Experience for Women.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 12, nos. 2–3 (2006): 135–54. doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v12.i2-3.30
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Julie E., Virginia Mehrtens, Elizabeth Smith, and Valerie Adams. CREW Revisited in 2007 the Year of Women in Engineering: An Update on Women's Progress in the Australian Engineering Workforce. Canberra: Engineers Australia, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Mary C., Claude M. Steele, and James J. Gross. “Signaling Threat: How Situational Cues Affect Women in Math, Science, and Engineering Settings.” Psychological Science 18, no. 10 (2007): 879–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF). “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: Data Tables, Table 9– 5.” National Science Foundation, 2013. http://Www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/pdf/tab9-5.pdf (accessed August 1, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Pierrakos, Olga, Thi K. Beam, Jamie Constantz, Aditya Johri, and Robin Anderson. “On the Development of a Professional Identity: Engineering Persisters vs Engineering Switchers.” Paper presented at the 39th American Society for Engineering Education/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers frontiers in education conference, San Antonio, TX, 18–21 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Plett, Melani, Caitlin Hawkinson, Jennifer J. Van Antwerp, Denise Wilson, and Crystal Bruxvoort. “Engineering Identity and the Workplace Persistence of Women with Engineering Degrees.” Paper presented at the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education annual conference, Vancouver, Canada, 26–29 June 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, Abigail, Barbara Bagilhole, and Andrew Dainty. “How Women Engineers Do and Undo Gender: Consequences for Gender Equality.” Gender, Work & Organization 16, no. 4 (2009): 411–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, Anne E. “Why Have All the Women Gone? A Study of Exit of Women from the Science and Engineering Professions.” The American Economic Review 84, no. 5 (1994): 1446–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Pam, and Mary Ayre. Counting the Losses…The Careers Review of Engineering Women: An Investigation of Women's Retention in the Australian Engineering Workforce. Canberra: National Women in Engineering Committee, Engineers Australia, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sappleton, Natalie, and Haifa Takruri-Rizk. “The Gender Subtext of Science, Engineering, and Technology (SET) Organizations: A Review and Critique.” Women's Studies 37, no. 3 (2008): 284–316. doi: 10.1080/00497870801917242
   Google Scholar
• Sappleton, Natalie, Haifa Takruri-Rizk, Sunrita Dhar-Bhattacharjee, and Rae Bezer. “The Organisational Culture of NW Engineering Workplaces: The Influence on Women Engineers.” Paper presented at the 6th annual Institute for Advanced Science-Science Technology and Society conference: critical issues in science and technology, Graz, Austria, 24–27 May 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, Sheri, Anne Colby, Kelly Macatangay, and William Sullivan. “What is Engineering Practice?” International Journal of Engineering Education 22, no. 3 (2006): 429–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonso, Karen. “Student Engineers and Engineer Identity: Campus Engineer Identities as Figured World.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 1, no. 2 (2006): 273–307. doi: 10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2
   Google Scholar
• Trevelyan, James. “Technical Coordination in Engineering Practice.” Journal of Engineering Education 96, no. 3 (2007): 191–204. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00929.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, Jacqueline H. “‘Allowed into a Man's World’ Meanings of Work–Life Balance: Perspectives of Women Civil Engineers as ‘Minority’ Workers in Construction.” Gender, Work & Organization 16, no. 1 (2009): 37–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00352.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WISE. Statistics Summary. WISE Campaign, 2012. http://Www.wisecampaign.org.uk/files/useruploads/files/wise_2012_stats_summary.pdf (accessed August 1, 2013).
   Google Scholar