Embroidering engineering: a case of embodied learning and design of a tangible user interface

References

• Benbasat, Izak, and Robert W. Zmud. “Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance.” MIS Quarterly 23, no. 1 (1999): 3–16. doi: 10.2307/249403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Xiniling, Michael McCool, Asanobu Kitamoto, and Stephen Mann. “Embroidery Modeling and Rendering.” Paper presented at the Graphics Interface, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, Douglas E., David Gries, Michael C. Mulder, Allen Tucker, A. Joe Turner, and Paul R. Young. “Computing as a Discipline.” Communications of the ACM 32, no. 1 (1989): 9–23. doi: 10.1145/63238.63239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortés-Rico, Laura, and Giovanny Piedrahita-Solórzano. “Participatory Design in Practice.” Paper presented at Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015, Baberg, Germany, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne, Richard. Cornucopia Limited: Design and Dissent on the Internet. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, Tânia Batista da, and Sarita Brazão Vieira. “Entre o bordado e a renda: condições de trabalho e saúde das labirinteiras de Juarez Távora/Paraíba.” [Between Embroidery and Lacemaking: Health and Labor Conditions for Labyrinth-Makers from Juarez Távora/Paraíba]. Psicologia: Ciência E Profissão 29, no. 2 (2009): 258–75.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, Janet E., and Robert J. Sternberg, eds. The Psychology of Problem Solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, Hubert L. “Merleau-Ponty and Recent Cognitive Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Merleau-Ponty, edited by Taylor Carman and Mark B.N. Hansen, 129–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, Alan R., Salvatore T. March, Jinsoo Park, and Sudha Ram. “Design Science in Information Systems Research.” MIS Quarterly 28, no. 1 (2004): 75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii, Hiroshi. “The Tangible User Interface and Its Evolution.” Communications of the ACM 51, no. 6 (2008): 32–6. doi: 10.1145/1349026.1349034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemmer, Scott, Björn Hartmann, and Leila Takayama. “How Bodies Matter: Five Themes for Interaction Design.” Paper presented at DIS ‘06 6th conference on Designing Interactive Systems, New York, NY, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. Organización y decisión. Autopoiesis, acción y entendimiento comunicativo [Organization and Decisions. Autopoiesis, Action and Communicative Understanding]. Barcelona, Spain: Anthropos, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, Gerard, Isaac Munlo, and Mandy Brown. “The Theory and Practice of Boundary Critique: Developing Housing Services for Older People.” The Journal of Operational Research Society 49, no. 5 (1998): 467–78. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, Enid. Designing Human Systems for New Technology: The ETHICS Method. Manchester, UK: Manchester Business School, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Nardini, Krizia. “Becoming Otherwise: Embodied-Thinking and the ‘Transformative Matter’ of (New) Feminist Materialist Theorizing.” Artnodes 14 (2014): 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, Wanda J. “Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work.” Organization Studies 28, no. 9 (2007): 1435–48. doi: 10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawley, Alice. “Engineering Faculty Drawing the Line: A Taxonomy of Boundary Work in Academic Engineering.” Engineering Studies 4, no. 2 (2012): 145–69. doi: 10.1080/19378629.2012.687000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Bustos, Tania. “Thinking with Care: Destruction and Mending in an Ethnography of Crafting and Technology.” Paper presented at the Special Program in Social Sciences, Institute of Advanced Studies, Princeton, NJ, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Qiming, Tian, Luo Yupin, and Hu Dongcheng. “Shape Decomposition Algorithm in Embroidery.” Journal of Computer-Aided Design and Computer Graphics 17, no. 12 (2005): 2625–30.
   Google Scholar
• Reitsma, Lizette, Andrew Smith, and Elise van den Hoven. “StoryBeads: Preserving Indigenous Knowledge Through Tangible Interaction Design.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Culture and Computing, Kyoto, Japan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Douglas. Feeling Extended: Sociality as Extended Body-Becoming-Mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, Daniela K., and Kimiko Ryokai. “Spyn: Augmenting the Creative and Communicative Potential of Craft.” Presented at SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Shihua, Gong, Huang Yu, Zhu Guoli, and Lu Feng. “Key Technology of High Speed Shuttle Embroidery Machine Control System.” Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition) 38, no. 5 (2010): 79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. “The Structure of Ill Structured Problems.” Artificial Intelligence 4, nos. 3–4 (1973): 181–201. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Andrew Cyrus, and Paula Kotzé. “Indigenous African Artefacts: Can They Serve as Tangible Programming Objects?” Paper presented at IST-Africa, Durban, South Africa, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Andrew, Lizette Reitsma, Elise van den Hoven, Paula Kotzé, and Louise Coetzee. “Towards Preserving Indigenous Oral Stories Using Tangible Objects.” Paper presented at Second International Conference on Culture and Computing (Culture and Computing 2011), Kyoto, Japan, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Trevelyan, James. “Reconstructing Engineering from Practice.” Engineering Studies 2, no. 3 (2010): 175–95. doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.520135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uğur, Seçil. Wearing Embodied Emotions: A Practice Based Design Research on Wearable Technology. Milan, Italy: Springer, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Vessuri, Hebe, ed. Conocimiento y necesidades de las Sociedades Latinoamericanas [Knowledge and the Needs of Latin American Societies]. Caracas, Venezuela: IVIC, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Vinck, Dominique, ed. Everyday Engineering: An Ethnography of Design and Innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Mattew C. “Listening in the Pakal Controversy: A Matter of Care in Ancient Maya Studies.” Social Studies of Science 44, no. 6 (2014): 930–54. doi: 10.1177/0306312714543964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, Brian, and Adnan Ahmad. “Socio-technical System Design.” In The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, edited by Mads Soegaard and Rikke Friis Dam. Interaction Design Foundation, 2014. Accessed February 15, 2016. <https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed/socio-technical-system-design#chapter_start>.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Rosalind. Retooling: A Historian Confronts Technological Change. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar