REFERENCES
- Boock, M., & Kunda, S. (2009). Electronic thesis and dissertation metadata workflow at Oregon State University Libraries. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 47(3-4), 297–308.
- Chapman, J.W., Reynolds, D., & Shreeves, S.A. (2009). Repository metadata: Approaches and challenges. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 47(3-4), 309–325. addinfo:10.1080/01639370902735020
- Directory of Open Access Repositories—OpenDOAR. (2014 Retrieved from http://www.opendoar.org
- Lynch, C.A. (2003). Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL Bimonthly Report, 226, 1–7.
- Ochoa, X., & Duval, E. (2009). Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 10, 67–91.
- Park, E.G., & Richard, M. (2011). Metadata assessment in e-theses and dissertations of Canadian institutional repositories. The Electronic Library, 29(3), 394–407.
- Park, J.-R., & Tosaka, Y. (2010aMetadata creation practices in digital repositories and collections: Schemata, selection criteria, and interoperability. Information Technology and Libraries, 293, 104–113.
- Park, J.-R., & Tosaka, Y. (2010b). Metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections: Criteria, semantics and mechanisms. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 48, 696–715.
- Suber, P. (2006Open access to electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs). SPARC Open Access Newsletter. Retrieved from http://legacy.earlham.edu/∼peters/fos/newsletter/07-02-06.htm#etds