Manifestations of Metadata Structures in Research Datasets and Their Ontic Implications

References

• Allen, A., Teuben, P., Nemiroff, R. J., & Shamir, L. (2012). Practices in code discoverability: Astrophysics source code library. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.1028v1
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosio, L. M., David, J. M., Braga, R., Stroele, V., Campos, F., & Araujo, M. A. (2017). WIP: Prov-SE-O: A provenance ontology to support scientists in scientific experimentation process. 2017 IEEE/ACM 12th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Science (SE4Science). doi:10.1109/se4science.2017.12
   Google Scholar
• Australian National Data Service. (2011). What is research data? Retrieved from https://www.ands.org.au/guides/what-is-research-data
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. (2000). The new urban geography of the third dimension. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(4), 483–484.
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T. (1999). Weaving the web. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Linked Data. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
   Google Scholar
• Bönisch, S., Brickenstein, M., Chrapary, H., Greuel, G.-M., & Sperber, W. (2013). Swmath–a new information service for mathematical software. In International conference on intelligent computer mathematics (pp. 369–373). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39320-4_31
   Google Scholar
• Borgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059–1078. doi:10.1002/asi.22634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, F., Silva, V., Oliveira, D. de, Ocaña, K., Ogasawara, E., Dias, J., … Mattoso, M. (2013). Capturing and querying workflow runtime provenance with PROV. In Proceedings of the joint EDBT/ICDT 2013 workshops on – EDBT 13. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2457317.2457365
   Google Scholar
• DataCite Metadata Working Group. (2017). DataCite metadata schema for the publication and citation of research data. version 4.1. DataCite e.V. doi:10.5438/0015
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fegraus, E. H., Andelman, S., Jones, M. B., & Schildhauer, M. (2005). Maximizing the value of ecological data with structured metadata: An introduction to ecological metadata language. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 86(3), 158–168. doi:10.1890/0012-9623(2005)86[158:MTVOED]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Feng, C. (2013). Mapping geospatial metadata to open provenance model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(11), 5073–5081. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2013.2252181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanders, J., & Jannidis, F. (2017). Data modeling in a digital humanities context. In J. Flanders & F. Jannidis (Eds.), The shape of data in digital humanities (pp. i33–i46). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garijo, D. (2017). AI buzzwords explained: Scientific workflows. AI Matters, 3(1), 4–8. doi:10.1145/3054837.3054839
   Google Scholar
• Gent, I., Jones, C., & Matthews, B. (2015). Guidelines for persistently identifying software using DataCite – A JISC Research Data Spring Project. Retrieved from http://purl.org/net/epubs/work/24058274
   Google Scholar
• Gil, Y., Ratnakar, V., & Garijo, D. (2015). OntoSoft: Capturing scientific software metadata. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Knowledge Capture, (pp. 1–4). Palisades, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2815833.2816955
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, N. D., Méndez, E., & Hernández-Pérez, T. (2016). Social sciences and humanities research data and metadata: A perspective from thematic data repositories. El profesional de la información, 25(4), 545–555. doi:10.3145/epi.2016.jul.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, K. L., Donoghue, M., DiLauro, T., Birkland, A., & Morrissey, S. (2016). Using RMap to describe distributed works as linked data graphs. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Digital Preservation. Bern: Swiss National Library. https://hdl.handle.net/11353/10.503179
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization. (2009, May 15). ISO/TC 211 N2705. Retrieved from http://metadata-standards.org/Document-library/Documents-by-number/WG2-N1251-N1300/WG2_N1292_TC211n2705_Report_19150.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jeng, W., He, D., & Oh, J. S. (2016). Toward a conceptual framework for data sharing practices in social sciences: A profile approach. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–10. doi:10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301037
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. B., Boettiger, C., Cabunoc Mayes, A., Smith, A., Slaughter, P., Niemeyer, K., … Goble, C. (2017). CodeMeta: An exchange schema for software metadata. version 2.0. KNB Data Repository. doi:10.5063/schema/codemeta-2.0.
   Google Scholar
• Karcher, S., Kirilova, D., & Weber, N. (2016). Beyond the matrix: Repository services for qualitative data. IFLA Journal, 42(4), 292–302. doi:10.1177/0340035216672870
   Google Scholar
• Katayama, T., Wilkinson, M. D., Aoki-Kinoshita, K. F., Kawashima, S., Yamamoto, Y., Yamaguchi, A., … Takagi, T. (2014). BioHackathon series in 2011 and 2012: Penetration of ontology and linked data in life science domains. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 5, 5. doi:10.1186/2041-1480-5-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D. S., Niemeyer, K. E., Smith, A. M., Anderson, W. L., Boettiger, C., Hinsen, K., … Rios, F. (2016). Software vs. data in the context of citation. PeerJ Preprints, 4, e2630v1. doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.2630v1
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Adler, M. (2015). Social scientists' data sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 408–418. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. (2011). Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences. Science, 331(6018), 719–721. doi:10.1126/science.1197872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lando, P., Lapujade, A., Kassel, G., & Fürst, F. (2007, July). Towards a general ontology of computer programs. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software and Data Technologies ICSOFT. Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Litwin, L., & Rossa, M. (2011). Metadata profiles based on ISO 19115. In Geoinformation metadata in INSPIRE and SDI. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 75–97). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, J., Brown, A., Lister, A. L., Ison, J., Hull, D., Parkinson, H., … Stevens, R. (2014). The Software Ontology (SWO): A resource for reproducibility in biomedical data analysis, curation and digital preservation. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 5(1), 25. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/2041-1480-5-25.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangan, E. U. (1995, June). The making of a standard ( vol. 14 (2), p. 99). Chicago, IL: Information Technology and Libraries.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, B., McIlwrath, B., Giaretta, D., & Conway, E. (2008). The significant properties of software: A study. JISC, Retrieved from https://epubs.stfc.ac.uk/work/65878
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, B., Shaon, A., Bicarregui, J., & Jones, C. (2010). A framework for software preservation. International Journal of Digital Curation, 5(1), 91–105. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v5i1.145
   Google Scholar
• McQuilton, P., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Rocca-Serra, P., Thurston, M., Lister, A., Maguire, E., & Sansone, S.-A. (2016). BioSharing: Curated and crowd-sourced metadata standards, databases and data policies in the life sciences. Database, 2016, baw075. doi:10.1093/database/baw075
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, B., Weber, L., Eaton, N., Indiana Geological Survey, & Irwin, P. (2009). Underground Coal Mines: Indiana, 2010. Vector digital data. Retrieved from https://geo.btaa.org/catalog/8d658e56-fc51-4b88-9c2e-02ec63de1136
   Google Scholar
• Michener, W. K. (2015). Ecological data sharing. Ecological Informatics, 29(2), 33–44. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Missier, P., Dey, S., Belhajjame, K., Cuevas-Vicenttín, V., & Ludäscher, B. (2013). D-PROV: Extending the PROV provenance model with workflow structure. In 5th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance, TaPP '13 (pp. 9:1–9:7). Berkeley, CA: USENIX Association.
   Google Scholar
• National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration. (2010). Worldwide historical hurricane tracks from 1848 through the previous hurricane season. Geospatial Service Endpoint. Retrieved from data.gov: https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/worldwide-historical-hurricane-tracks-from-1848-through-the-previous-hurricane-season
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2006). Orthophoto Mosaic of La Paz County, Arizona. Raster Image. Retrieved from https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/GDGOrder.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Oberle, D., Lamparter, S., Grimm, S., Vrandecic, D., Staab, S., & Gangemi, A. (2006). Towards ontologies for formalizing modularization and communication in large software systems. Journal of Applied Ontology, 1(2), 163–202.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, W., de Oliveira, D., & Braganholo, V. (2015). Experiencing PROV-Wf for Provenance Interoperability in SWfMSs. In: B. Ludäscher & B. Plale (Eds.), Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes. IPAW 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8628, 294–296. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16462-5_38
   Google Scholar
• Pampel, H., Vierkant, P., Scholze, F., Bertelmann, R., Kindling, M., Klump, J., … Dieroif, U. (2013). Making research data repositories visible: The re3data.org registry. PLoS One, 8(11), e78080. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi, L. (2013). Contagious architecture: Computation, aesthetics, and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risam, R. (2015). Beyond the margins: Intersectionality and the digital humanities. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 9(2), Retrieved from http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000208/000208.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roke, E. R., Edwards, G., Hagenmaier, W., Noonan, D. W., Thornton, K., & Walsh, T. (2017). Metadata standards and policies. Retrieved from https://osf.io/4878z/
   Google Scholar
• Sanborn Map Company. (1920). Middletown, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, Dec. 1920. Image. Retrieved from https://collection1.libraries.psu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/maps1/id/14250
   Google Scholar
• Santana-Perez, I., Ferreira da Silva, R., Rynge, M., Deelman, E., Pérez-Hernández, M. S., & Corcho, O. (2017). Reproducibility of execution environments in computational science using semantics and clouds. Future Generation Computer Systems, 67, 354–367. doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsion, G., Milton, S., & Shanks, G. (2012). Data modeling: Description or design? Information & Management, 49, 151–163. doi:10.1016/j.im.2012.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. M., Katz, D. S., & Niemeyer, K. E. (2016). Software citation principles. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e86. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.86
   Google Scholar
• Starr, J. (2017, October 23). New DataCite metadata updates support software citation. DataCite Blog. Retrieved from https://blog.datacite.org/metadata-schema-4-1/
   Google Scholar
• Tenopir, C., Allard, S., & Douglass, K. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PloS One, 6(6), e21101. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thain, D., Ivie, P., & Meng, H. (2015). Techniques for preserving scientific software executions: Preserve the mess or encourage cleanliness? In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Digital Preservation (iPRES), 164–174. doi:10.7274/R0CZ353M.
   Google Scholar
• The Nature Conservancy. (2006). Terrestrial Ecoregions. Vector Digital Data. Retrieved from the Nature Conservancy. http://maps.tnc.org/gis_data.html.
   Google Scholar
• Trace, C., & Karadkar, U. (2015). Information management in the humanities: Scholarly processes, tools, and the construction of personal collections. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2), 491–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States of America, Federal Geographic Data Committee. (1998, June). Content standard for digital geospatial metadata. Retrieved from https://www.fgdc.gov/standards/projects/FGDC-standards-projects/metadata/base-metadata/v2_0698.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United States of America, Federal Geographic Data Committee. (2017, June 30). 2017 ISO Geospatial Metadata Summit Report. Retrieved from https://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/events/iso-metadata-summit-2017/iso-metadata-summit-summary-report-20170630.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United States of America, Federal Geographic Data Committee. (2011, October 20). Preparing for International Metadata. Retrieved from https://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/documents/preparing-for-international-metadata-guidance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vardigan, M., Heus, P., & Thomas, W. (2008). Data documentation initiative: Toward a standard for the social sciences. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(1), 107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, J., Bloom, D., Guralnick, R., Blum, S., Döring, M., Giovanni, R., … Vieglais, D. (2012). Darwin core: An evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLoS One, 7(1), e29715. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, E. (2016). Data documentation initiative. Technical Services Quarterly, 33(1), 93–94. doi:10.1080/07317131.2015.1093852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Wide Web Consortium. (2013). PROV-overview: An overview of the PROV family of documents. w3c working group. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-overview/
   Google Scholar
• World Wide Web Consortium. (2014, June 24). RDF 1.1 Primer. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, A., & Kim, Y. (2017). Social scientists' data reuse behaviors: Exploring the roles of attitudinal beliefs, attitudes, norms, and data repositories. Library & Information Science Research, 39(3), 224–233. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2017.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zviovich, D. (2017). Atlanta Police Department Crime Data (2009–2017). Retrieved from the Wolfram Data Repository: Http://www.atlantapd.org/i-want-to/crime-data-downloads
   Google Scholar