Advanced search
Publication Cover
Literacy Research and Instruction Volume 54, 2015 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
729
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Text Complexity: Primary Teachers’ Views

Jill FitzgeraldMetaMetrics, Durham, North Carolina;Emerita, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North CarolinaCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Elfrieda H. HiebertTextProject, Santa Cruz, California;University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California
,
Kimberly BowenMetaMetrics, Durham, North Carolina
,
E. Jackie Relyea-KimThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
Melody KungThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
&
Jeff ElmoreMetaMetrics, Durham, North Carolina
Pages 19-44 | Published online: 08 Oct 2014

References

  • ACT. (2006). Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Adams, M. (2009). The challenge of advanced texts: The interdependence of reading and learning. In E. H. Hiebert ( Ed.), Reading more, reading better: Are American students reading enough of the right stuff? ( pp. 163–189). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Aukerman, R. C. (1984). Approaches to beginning reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Baumann, J. F., Hoffman, J. V., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Ro, J. M. (2000). The First R yesterday and today: U.S. elementary reading instruction practices reported by teachers and administrators. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 338–377.
  • Bean, R. M., Cassidy, J., Grumet, J. E., Shelton. D. S., & Wallis, S. R. (2002). What do reading specialists do? Results from a national survey. The Reading Teacher, 55(8), 736–744.
  • Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Social studies texts are hard to understand: Mediating some of the difficulties. Language Arts, 68, 482–490.
  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Fundamentals in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69–85.
  • Clay, M. M. (2001). Change over time in children’s literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Doeden, M. (2010). Enduro racing. North Mankato, MN: Capstone Press.
  • Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes a day: The scarcity of informational text in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
  • Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implications for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 135–163.
  • Fink, A. (2003). How to sample in surveys (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fitzgerald, J. (2000). On distances: From campus teacher preparation to first grade literacy instruction and back again. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 455–461.
  • Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychology, 93, 3–22.
  • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40, 223–234.
  • Greenfield, R., Rinaldi, C., Proctor, P., & Cardarelli, A. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of RtI reform in an urban elementary school: A consensual qualitative analysis. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(2), 47–63.
  • Hayes, D. P., Wolfer, L. T., & Wolfe, M. F. (1996). Sourcebook simplification and its relation to the decline in SAT-Verbal scores. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 489–508.
  • Heller, R., & Greenleaf, C. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
  • Hiebert, E. H. (2011). Texts for beginning readers: The search for optimal scaffolds. In C. Conrad & R. Serlin ( Eds.), The Sage handbook for research in education: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry ( pp. 413–428). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration thresholds as a function of word probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 248–255.
  • Juola, P. (2003). Assessing linguistic complexity. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinne Sinnemäki, & F. Karlsson ( Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change ( pp. 89–108). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Klare, G. R. (1974 –1975). Assessing readability. Reading Research Quarterly, 10, 62–102.
  • Kleinhenz, S. M. (2008). Elephants. North Mankato, MN: Capstone Press.
  • Koons, H. (2011, February). Examining the text difficulty continuum and its role in preparing students for success. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Pacific Coast Research Conference, Coronado, CA.
  • Koslin, B. I., Zeno, S., & Koslin, S. (1987). The DRP: An effective measure in reading. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
  • McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–287.
  • Merlini Barbaresi, L. M. (2003). Towards a theory of text complexity. In L. Merlini Barbaresi ( Ed.), Complexity in language and text ( pp. 23–66). Pisa, Italy: Edizioni Plus.
  • Mesmer, H. A. (2006). Beginning reading materials: A national survey of primary teachers’ reported uses and beliefs. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 389–425.
  • Mesmer, H. A., Cunningham, J. W., & Hiebert, E. H. (2012). Toward a theoretical model of text complexity for the early grades: Learning from the past, anticipating the future. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 235–258.
  • Metsala, J. L. (1999). Young children’s phonological awareness and non-word repetition as a function of vocabulary development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 3–19.
  • Moss, B., & Newton, E. (2002). An examination of the informational text genre in basal readers. Reading Psychology, 23, 1–13.
  • Murray, M. S., Munger, K. A., & Hiebert, E. H. (in press). An analysis of two reading intervention programs: How do the words, texts, and programs compare? Elementary School Journal.
  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665–681.
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010a). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010b). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, Appendix A. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A.pdf
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010c). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects, Appendix B. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_B.pdf
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2012). Supplemental information for Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy: New research on text complexity. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from Common Core State Standards Initiative website: http://www.corestandards.org/resources
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Reading Maturity Metric. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.readingmaturity.com/rmm-web/#/
  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Akin, C. E. (1994). Developmental trends in lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 250–264.
  • Shanahan, T. (2011). Common Core Standards: Are we going to lower the fences or teach kids to climb? Reading Today, 29(1), 20–21.
  • Sheehan, K. M., Kostin, I., Futagi, Y., & Flor, M. (2010, December). Generating automated text complexity classifications that are aligned with targeted text complexity standards (ETS RR-10-28). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  • Stenner, A. J., Burdick, H., Sanford, E., & Burdick, D. (2006). How accurate are Lexile text measures? Journal of Applied Measurement, 7, 307–322.
  • Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 41, 225–234.
  • Survey Monkey. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.surveymonkey.com
  • Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., Peyton, J. A. (2005). Relative effectiveness of reading practice or word-level instruction in supplemental tutoring: How text matters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 364–382.
  • van der Sluis, F., & van den Broek, E. L. (2010). Using complexity measures in information retrieval. In Proceedings of the third symposium on information interaction in context ( pp. 18–22). New Brunswick, NJ: ACM.
  • Williamson, G., Fitzgerald, J., & Stenner, A. J. (in press). Student Growth in Reading Illuminates the Common Core Text-Complexity-Exposure Standard: Raising Both Bars. Elementary School Journal.
  • Williamson, G., Fitzgerald, J., & Stenner, A. J. (2013). The Common Core State Standards complexity goal: Figuring out how much complexity is enough. Educational Researcher, 42(2), 59–69.
  • Wirt, J., Choy, S., Rooney, P., Provasknik, S., Sen, A., & Tobin, R. (2004). The condition of education 2004 (NCES 2004-077). U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004077.pdf
  • Woolams, A. M. (2005). Imageability and ambiguity effects in speeded naming: Convergence and divergence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 878–890.
  • Wright, B., & Stone, M. (1999). Measurement essentials (2nd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range Incorporated.

References: Texts in Table 2

  • Adler, D. A., & Adler, M. S. (2010). A picture book of John and Abigail Adams. New York, NY: Holiday House.
  • Averill, E. (1960 /1988). The fire cat. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Bogacki, T. (2008). The champion of children: The story of Janusz Korczak. New York, NY: Farrar Straus Giroux.
  • Brown, C. L. (2006). After the dinosaurs: Mammoths and fossil mammals. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Burns, D. (2000). Clare’s secret. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
  • Capucilli, A. S. (1996). Biscuit. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Cowley, J. (1998). Microscope. Columbus, OH: Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
  • Davidson, S. ( retold from J. & W. Grimm). (2005). The frog prince. London, UK: Usborne.
  • Eastman, P. D. (1960 /1988). Are you my mother? New York, NY: Random House.
  • Elliott, C. (2006). Building a birdhouse. Logan, IA: Perfection Learning.
  • Fredericks, A. D. (2001). Under one rock: Bugs, slugs and other ughs. Nevada City, CA: Dawn Publications.
  • Hawes, A. (2000). Quork attack. Boston, MA: Rigby/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Ipcizade, C. (2008). Zebras. Mankato, MN: Capstone.
  • Jarman, J. (2000). Bully bear. Boston, MA: Rigby/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  • Kortenkamp, S. (2009). Spacecraft. Mankato, MN: Capstone.
  • Llewellyn, C., & Lovsin, P. (2010). Boo-hoo, Baby! London: Wayland.
  • Mackinnon, M. (2007). The sun and the wind (retold). London, UK: Usborne.
  • Maslen, B. L. (2006). Bump! New York, NY: Scholastic.
  • Maslen, B. L. (1976 /2006). Mat. New York, NY: Scholastic.
  • McClintock, B. (2005). Cinderella. New York, NY: Scholastic.
  • Meister, C. (1999). Catch that cat! New York, NY: Scholastic.
  • Melser, J. (2000). One, one, is the sun. Columbus, OH: Wright Group/McGraw-Hill.
  • O’Brien, A. (2002). Seth’s bath. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
  • O’Connor, J. (2008). Fancy Nancy at the museum. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  • Ransom, C. (2005). I like shoes! New York, NY: Scholastic.
  • Rueda, J. (2006). Plant life. Washington, DC: National Geographic Society.
  • Rylant, C. (2001). Poppleton in winter. New York, NY: Scholastic.
  • Seuss, Dr. (2003). Green eggs and ham. London, UK: HarperCollins.
  • Silverman, E. (2005). Cowgirl Kate and Cocoa. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
  • Verne, J. ( adapted by Jane Bingham). (2004). Around the world in eighty days. London, UK: Usborne.
  • Willems, M. (2008). I love my new toy! New York, NY: Scholastic.
  • Williams, L. D. (2005). Cranes. Mankato, MN: Capstone.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.