Learning to Construct Meaning From Text: A Case Study of the Relationship Between a Tutor and an English Learner Within a Response to Intervention Setting

References

• Applegate, M. D., Quinn, K. B., & Applegate, A. J. (2008). The critical reading inventory (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, J. F., & Schmitt, M. C. (1986). The what, why, how, and when of comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 39(7), 640–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomer, R. (1999). Conferring with struggling readers. New Advocate, 12(1), 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. J. (1999/2000). What kind of text for whom and when? The Reading Teacher, 53(4), 292–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, Y. N., & Fagan, Y. M. (2013). The effects of an integrated reading comprehension strategy: A culturally responsive teaching approach for fifth-grade students reading comprehension. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 59–69. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2012.664581
   Google Scholar
• Buly, M. R., & Valencia, S. W. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 219–239. doi:10.3102/01623737024003219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, C. L. (1980). The reading interview: 1977. In B. P. Farr & D. J. Strickler (Eds.), Reading comprehension: Resource guide. Bloomington, IN: School of Education, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1996). The nature of the relationship between comprehension skill and the ability to tell a story. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 187–201. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1996.tb00701.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 489–503. doi:10.1023/A:1008084120205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2009). Reading comprehension development from 8 to 14 years: The contribution of component skills and processes. In R. K. Wagner, C. Schatschneider, & C. Phythian-Sence (Eds.), Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundation of reading comprehension (pp. 143–175). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., & Bryant, P. E. (2000). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 31–40. doi:10.1023/A:1008058319399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Wesmer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Gilbert, J. K., Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Cho, E. … Bouton, B. (2012). Accelerating chronically unresponsive children to tier 3 instruction: What level of data is necessary to ensure selection accuracy? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 204–216. doi:10.1177/0022219412442151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., Barth, A. E., Vaughn, S., & Francis, D. J. (2013). Effects of Tier 3 intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties and characteristics of inadequate responders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 633–648. doi:10.1037/a0032581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Krauss, L. A. (1995). Partner reading and writing: Peer social dialogue and the zone of proximal development. Journal of Literacy Research, 27(1), 45–63. doi:10.1080/10862969509547868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239–264. doi:10.3102/00346543061002239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dozier, C., Garnett, S., & Tabatabai, S. (2011). Responsive teaching through conversation. The Reading Teacher, 64(8), 636–638. doi:10.1598/RT.64.8.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleisher, B. M. (1990). Self-corrections of poor comprehenders. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6(2), 105–115. doi:10.1080/0748763900060203
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 174–206. doi:10.3102/00028312034001174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Vaughn, S. (2012). Responsiveness-to-Intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195–203. doi:10.1177/0022219412442150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. doi:10.3102/00346543071002279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geva, E., & Massey-Garrison, A. (2013). A comparison of the language skills of ELLs and monolinguals who are poor decoders, poor comprehenders, or normal readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(5), 387–401. doi:10.1177/0022219412466651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282–313. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handsfield, L. J., & Jimenez, R. T. (2008). Revisiting cognitive strategy instruction in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: Cautions and possibilities. Language Arts, 85(6), 450–458.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1940). How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods (1st ed.), New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, J., & Gilles, C. (2003). Al’s story: Overcoming beliefs that inhibit learning. Language Arts, 80(4), 259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, R. M. (2012). ELLs’ perceptions of reading. Reading Improvement, 49(3), 113–126.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, E. L. (2012). Understanding and supporting vulnerable readers: An ecological system perspective (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest, UMI Dissertation Publishing (Order no. 3640482).
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, E. L. (2015). Literacy and vulnerability: Shame or growth for readers who struggle. Talking Points, 26(2), 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Jitendra, A. K., Burgess, C., & Gajria, M. (2011). Cognitive strategy instruction for improving expository text comprehension of students with learning disabilities: The quality of evidence. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 135–159. doi:10.1177/001440291107700201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. H., & Winograd, P. N. (1985). Passive failure in reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17(4), 279–301. doi:10.1080/10862968509547546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 275–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S. L., Padron, Y. N., & Waxman, H. L. (1985). The cognitive reading strategies of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4), 789–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal, D., Johanson, G., Toth, A., & Huang, C. C. (2004). Increasing at-risk students’ literacy skills: Fostering success for children and their preservice reading endorsement tutors. Reading Improvement, 41(2), 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2012). The development of reading comprehension skills in children learning English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 25, 1873–1898. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9309-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1986). Reading disability research: An interactionist perspective. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 111–136. doi:10.3102/00346543056001111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (2009). Assessment of reading and writing difficulties: An interactive approach (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavi, J. N., & Tensfeldt, L. (2013). Untangling reading comprehension strategy instruction: Assisting struggling readers in the primary grades. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 77–92. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2012.668576
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. (2007). “The discovery channel said so” and other barriers to comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 60(7), 656–666. doi:10.1598/RT.60.7.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, S. (1994). A nonreader becomes a reader: A case study of literacy acquisition by a severely disabled reader. Reading Research Quarterly, 29(2), 156–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2011). Measuring deep, reflective comprehension and learning strategies: Challenges and successes. Metacognition Learning, 6, 195–203. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9082-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisinger, E. B., Bradley, B. A., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Kuhn, M. R., & Morris, R. D. (2009). Myth and reality of the word caller: The relation between teacher nominations and prevalence among elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(3), 147–159. doi:10.1037/a0017191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D., & Gaffney, M. (2011). Building reading fluency in a learning-disabled middle school reader. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(5), 331–341. doi:10.1598/JAAL.54.5.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamoto, J., Lindsey, K. A., & Manis, F. R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners’ word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 20, 691–719. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9045-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (1988). Becoming a skilled reader. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Hartt, J., & Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18, 657–686. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-3355-z
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1239–1252. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13(1), 5–22. doi:10.1080/10862968109547390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R. (1989). Strategies for comprehending text and coping with reading difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(1), 32–42. doi:10.2307/1510250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, G. (1983). The gradual release of responsibility model of instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 112–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kunita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90(1), 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, M., & Beem, S. (2012). Examining the relations between reading fluency and reading comprehension for English language learners. Psychology in the Schools, 49(6), 539–553. doi:10.1002/pits.21616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E., & Hiebert, E. H. (1996). Creating and integrated approach to literacy instruction. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, D. M., Anderson, K. L., & Sweeney, J. M. (2010). Early intervention for reading difficulties: The interactive strategies approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. C. (1990). A questionnaire to measure children’s awareness of strategic reading processes. The Reading Teacher, 43(7), 454–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes-Guinan, K., & Goldenberg, C. (2010). Use with caution: What CELDT results can and cannot tell us. The CATESOL Journal, 22(1), 189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Timmons, B. J., & Morgan, D. N. (2010). Preservice tutors and first-grade students: Instruction, interactions, and faculty feedback. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 15–30. doi:10.1080/19388070903402118
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J., & Paris, S. (1995). How literacy tasks influence children’s motivation for literacy. The Reading Teacher, 48(8), 662–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2010). Tier 3 Interventions for students with significant reading problems. Theory Into Practice, 49(4), 305–314. doi:10.1080/00405841.2010.510759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, J., Moorman, M., & Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 12–27. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, J., Patterson, E., Salas, R., Prater, S., & Turner, M. (2001). “More than just reading”: The human factor in reaching resistant readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(2), 177–201. doi:10.1080/19388070209558364
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children’s problems in text comprehension: An experimental investigation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar

Children’s Books

• Lobel, A. (1980). Fables. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, R. (1997–2011). The A to Z mystery series. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Sachar, L. (1989). Sideways arithmetic from wayside school. New York, NY: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Sachar, L. (1985). Sideways stories from the wayside school. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. (1981). Scary stories to tell in the dark. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar