References
- Achieve the Core. (2010). Comparing the Common Core State Standards for English language arts literacy in history/social studies, science and technical subjects to California and Massachusetts standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.achieve.org/files/CAMAELABrief.pdf
- Alvarez, M. C., Armstrong, S. L., Elish-Piper, L., Matthews, M. W., & Risko, V. J. (2009). Deconstructing the construct of “struggling reader”: Standing still or transforming expectations and instruction? American Reading Forum Annual Yearbook, 29. Retrieved from http://americanreadingforum.org/yearbook/yearbooks/09_yearbook/Alvarez%20and%20Armstrong.pdf
- Cassidy, J., Ortlieb, E., & Grote-Garcia, S. (2016). Beyond the common core: Examining 20 years of literacy priorities and their impact on struggling readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(2), 91–104. Doi:10.1080/19388071.2015.1136011
- Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Close reading as an intervention for struggling middle school readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57, 367–376. doi:10.1002/jaal.266
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (NGA & CCSO). (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ela-literacy
- National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
- Sorhagen, N. (2013). Early teacher expectations disproportionately affect poor children’s high school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 465–477. doi:10.1037/a0031754
- The Education Trust. (2015b). Checking in: Do classroom assignments reflect today’s higher standards? Equity in motion. Washington, DC: Author.