Effective Writing Content Conferences in a Sixth Grade Classroom: A Cross-Case Analysis

References

• Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading, and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bissex, G. (1981). Writing conferences: Alternatives to the red pencil. Learning, 11(4), 74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. (1985). Learn to think through writing. In A. Jaggar & M. T. Smith-Burke (Eds.), Observing the language learner (pp. 190–198). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M., & Harwayne, S. (1987). The writing workshop: A world of difference. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Carnicelli, T. A. (1980). The writing conference: A one-to-one conversation. In T. Donovan & B. W. McClelland (Eds.), Eight approaches to teaching comprehension (pp. 101–131). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• DeGroff, L. (1992). Process-writing teachers’ responses to fourth-grade writers’ first drafts. The Elementary School Journal, 93(2), 131–144. doi:10.1086/461717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPardo, A. P., & Freedman, S. W. (1988). Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 58, 119–149. doi:10.3102/00346543058002119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1983). The importance of the act of reading. The Journal of Education, 165(1), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gere, A., & Abbott, R. D. (1985). Talking about writing: The language of writing groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 362–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasswell, K., Parr, J. M., & McNaughton, S. (2003). Four ways to work against yourself when conferencing with struggling writers. Language Arts, 80(4), 291–298. doi:10.2307/41484145
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104, 396–407. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.48870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. H. (1984). A researcher learns to write: Selected articles and monographs. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Harste, J. C., Short, K. G., & Burke, C. (1988). Creating classrooms for authors: The reading-writing connection. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Lensmire, T. J. (1994). Writing workshop as carnival: Reflections on an alternative learning environment. Harvard Educational Review, 64(4), 371–391. doi:10.17763/haer.64.4.u1q517012jt516t6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. G., & Wilcox, B. (2013). Developing literacy: Reading and writing to, with, and by children. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D. M. (1979). The listening eye: Reflections on the writing conference. College English, 41(1), 13–18. doi:10.2307/376356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, D. M. (1980). Writing as a process: How writing finds its own meaning. In T. R. Donovan & B. W. McLelland (Eds.), Eight approaches to teaching composition (pp. 3–20). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D. M. (1985). A writer teaches writing (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Nickel, J. (2001). When writing conferences don’t work: Students’ retreat from teacher agenda. Language Arts, 79(2), 136–147.
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, M. (1991). Dialogues of deliberation: Conversation in the teacher-student writing conference. Written Communication, 8, 131–162. doi:10.2307/41483217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569
   Google Scholar
• Simmerman, S., Haward, S., Pierce, L., Peterson, N., Morrison, T., Korth, B., … Shumway, J. (2012). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of process writing. Literacy Research and Instruction, 51, 1–16. doi:10.1080/19388071.2011.557764
   Google Scholar
• Sperling, M. (1991). Dialogues of deliberation: Conversation in the teacher-student writing conference. Written Communication, 8, 131–162. doi:10.1177/0741088391008002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. P., & Elias, D. (1987). Writing conference talk: Factors associated with high- and low-rated writing conferences. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(2), 266–285.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar