Associations of Reading Knowledge with Kindergarten and First Grade Teachers’ Reported Instructional Strategies

References

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agathangelou, S. A., Charalambous, C. Y., & Koutselini, M. (2016). Reconsidering the contribution of teacher knowledge to student learning: Linear or curvilinear effects? Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 125–138. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, M. T., Ortlieb, E., Cheek, E. H., Pate, R. S., & Fetters, C. (2012). First-grade teachers’ perception and implementation of a semi-scripted reading curriculum. Language & Education: An International Journal, 26(1), 77–90. doi:10.1080/09500782.2011.618540
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2002). What I’ve learned about effective reading instruction from studying a decade of exemplary elementary classroom teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 740–747. doi:10.1177/003172170208301007
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J. (2015). Collaboration in collaborative learning. Interaction Studies, 16(3),451–473. https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1075/is.16.3.05bak
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. F. & Lastrapes, R. E. (2019). The writing performance of elementary students using a digital writing application: Results ofa teacher-librarian collaboration. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(4),343-363. doi:10.1108/ITSE-08-2018-0057
   Google Scholar
• Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G. J., & Esquivel, S. L. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 18(6), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. A., Morgan, G. B., Kromrey, J. D., & Ferron, J. M. (2010). Cluster size in multilevel models: The impact of sparse data structures on point and interval estimates in two-level models JSM Proceedings, Survey Research Methods Section (pp. 4057-4067).Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Block, C. C., Parris, S. R., Reed, K. L., Whiteley, C. S., & Cleveland, M. D. (2009). Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 262–281. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1037/a0014319
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. G., Vaughn, S., Buckley, P., Reutebuch, C., Roberts, G., & Klingner, J. (2016). Collaborative strategic reading for students with learning disabilities in upper elementary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 82(4), 409–427. doi:10.1177/0014402915625067
   Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi:10.1177/1529100618772271
   Google Scholar
• Charalambous, C. Y. (2015). Working at the intersection of teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs, and teaching practice: A multiple-case study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(5), 427–445. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9318-7
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26(1), 71–81. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. K. W., Tse, S. K., & Chow, K. (2011). Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 132–143. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.07.017
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1993). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 136–163.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Jakobsons, L. J., Crowe, E., & Granger, J. (2009). Instruction, student engagement, and reading growth in reading first classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 109(3), 221–250. doi:10.1086/592305
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Katch, E. L. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: The effect of classroom instruction by child interactions on early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(4), 305–336. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0804_1
   Google Scholar
• Cowles, M. H. (1988). Publishing student writing. Bloomington: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education PolicyAnalysis, 8(1),1-44. doi: 10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
   Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher.Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(20),1-10.
   Google Scholar
• Egloff, F., & Souvignier, E. (2019). Effects of teacher belief adaptivity on students’ reading skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education: A Journal of Education and Development, 1(1), 1–19. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00448-2
   Google Scholar
• ESSA (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015-2016).
   Google Scholar
• Estabrook, R., & Neale, M. (2013). A comparison of factor score estimation methods in the presence of missing data: Reliabilityand an application to nicotine dependence. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(1),1-27. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.730072
   Google Scholar
• Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86(1), 1–14. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882
   Google Scholar
• Fleischman, S., Scott, C., & Sargrad, S. (2016). Better evidence, better choices, better schools: State supports for evidence-based school improvement and the every student succeeds act. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress (CAP) and the Knowledge Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R. (2007). Primary prevention in classroom reading instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 24–30. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1177/004005990703900504
   Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M. N., Fletcher, J. M., Moats, L. C., & Francis, D. J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 1–29. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Foulin, J. N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read? Reading and Writing, 18(2), 129–155. doi:10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 34–44. doi:10.1177/00224669050390010401
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Cronen, S., Eaton, M., Kurki, A., Ludwig, M., Jones, W., Sztejnberg, L. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement. (NCEE 2008-4030). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbau Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gourlet, P., & Decortis, F. (2018). Prototyping a designerly learning through authentic making activities in elementary classrooms. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16(1), 31–38. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 3(2), 5–34. doi:10.1080/0968776950030202
   Google Scholar
• Grice, J. W. (2001). Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 430-450. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.430
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H. (1988). The role of literacy experiences in early childhood programs. The Elementary School Journal, 89(2), 160–171. doi:10.1086/461570
   Google Scholar
• International Dyslexia Association. (2010). Knowledge and practice standards for teachers of reading. Washington, D.C.: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2018). Standards for the preparation of literacy professionals 2017. Newark, DE: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Literacy Association. (2019). Children experiencing reading difficulties: What we know and what we can do [Literacy leadership brief]. Newark, DE: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Reading Association. (2007). Teaching reading well: A synthesis of the International Reading Association’s research on teacher preparation for reading instruction. Washington, D.C.: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi, M., & Purcell, T. (2003). PALS-K instructional strategies for Virginia’s Early Intervention Reading Initiative (CD). Charlottesville, VA: Rubicon Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, R. L. P., Bratsch-Hines, M., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2018). Kindergarten and first grade teachers’ content and pedagogical content knowledge of reading and associations with teacher characteristics at rural low-wealth schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74(1), 190–204. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L. (1968). A Monte Carlo approach to the number of factors problem. Psychometrika, 33(1),37-71. doi: 10.1007/bf02289675
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D., Abbott, R. D., Green, L. B., Beretvas, S. N., Cox, S., Potter, N. S., Gray, A. L. (2002). Beginning literacy: Links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1),69-86. doi: 10.1177/002221940203500106
   Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D., Harry, D. R., Cox, S.., Sidman, S., Covill, A E.., & Cunningham, A. E. (2002). Reading teachers' knowledge of children'sliterature and English phonology. Annals of Dyslexia, 52(1),207-228. doi: 10.1007/s11881-002-0013-x
   Google Scholar
• McGrail, E., & Davis, A. (2011). The influence of classroom blogging on elementary student writing. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(4), 415–437. doi:10.1080/02568543.2011.605205
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44(1), 81–102. doi:10.1007/bf02648156
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D. (1993). The relationship between children’s concept of word in text and phoneme awareness in learning to read: A longitudinal study. Research in the Teaching of Reading, 27(2), 133–154.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D. (2015). Preventing early reading failure. The Reading Teacher, 68(7), 502–509. doi:10.1002/trtr.1346
   Google Scholar
• National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2016). What teachers should know and be able to do. Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). ECLS-K public-use: Data files and electronic codebook. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Novelli, J. (1998). Young writer’s workshop: It’s time to publish. Instructor, 107(8), 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Paige, D. D., Rupley, W. H., Smith, G. S., Olinger, C., & Leslie, M. (2018). Acquisition of letter naming knowledge, phonological awareness, and spelling knowledge of kindergarten children at risk for learning to read. Child Development Research, (2018(1), 1–10. doi:10.1155/2018/2142894
   Google Scholar
• Paley, V. G. (1981). Wally’s Stories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S., & Carpenter, R. (2004). Children’s motivation to read. In J. Hoffman & D. Schallert (Eds.), The texts in elementary classrooms (pp. 61–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009). Conceptualization, Measurement, and Improvement of Classroom Processes: Standardized Observation Can Leverage Capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2),109-119. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09332374
   Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Connor, C. M., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers' knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(3),224-248. doi: 10.1080/10888430902851364
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. R. M., Price, C. B., & Price-Mohr, R. M. (2018). Synthetic phonics and decodable instructional reading texts: How far do these support poor readers? Dyslexia, 24(2), 190–196. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1002/dys.1581
   Google Scholar
• Rankin-Erickson, J. L., & Pressley, M. (2000). A survey of instructional practices of special education teachers nominated as effective teachers of literacy. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(4), 206–225. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1207/sldrp1504_5
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T., Stokes, F., & Young, C. (2017). The role of the teacher in reader’s theater instruction. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 5(2), 168–174.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T. V., & Nageldinger, J. K. (2016). The fluency factor: Authentic instruction and assessment for reading success in the common core classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, D. (2007). The triumph of look-say: Dumbing-down reading instruction. Education Next, 7(1), 80–81.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Coyne, M., Schreiber, F. J., Eckert, R. D., & Gubbins, E. J. (2007). Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: An evidence based study. Elementary School Journal, 108(1), 3–23. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1086/522383
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, J. (2019). The effects of collaborative learning on student achievement in reading ( Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences). ProQuest Information & Learning. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy006.nclive.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2018-65232-222&site=eds-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, D. S., Mazón, N., Littleton, K., & Vélez, M. (2014). Developing reading comprehension through collaborative learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(2), 138–158. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01526.x
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, J. (2015). Trends in teacher certification: Equipping teachers to prepare proficient readers. Education Commission ofthe States, 1(1),1-4.Rowland, J. (2015). Trends in teacher certification: Equipping teachers to prepare proficient readers. Education Commission of the States, 1(1),1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning? In A. S. Goodsell (Ed.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, PA: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. pp 10-29.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Stachoviak, S. (1996). Will kindergartners’ writing experiences improve their learning of letter names and sounds? Teaching and Change, 3(3), 315–324.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, D., & Schickedanz, J. (2004). Learning about print in preschool: Working with letters, words, and beginning links with phonemic awareness. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland, M., & Abbott, L. (2010). Enhancing the early reading experience: Books, strategies, and concepts. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 66–68. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1598/RT.64.1.10
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Torff, B. (2005). Developmental changes in teachers’ beliefs about critical-thinking activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 13–22. Retrieved from: https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.13
   Google Scholar
• Vernon-Feagans, L., Bratsch-Hines, M., Varghese, C., Cutrer, E. A., & Garwood, J. D. (2018). Improving Struggling Readers’ Early Literacy Skills through a Tier 2 Professional Development Program for Rural Classroom Teachers: The Targeted Reading Intervention The Elementary School Journal, 118, 525-548. 4 doi:10.1086/697491
   Google Scholar
• Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2019). Teachers’ adoption of inquiry-based learning activities: The importance of beliefs about education, the self, and the context. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 423–431. Retrieved from https://doi-org.proxy006.nclive.org/10.1177/0022487117751399
   Google Scholar
• Wellen, L. (2018). A classroom for all students: Project-based learning. Lutheran Education, (2018(1), 56–66.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69(3),848-872. doi:10.1111/cdev.1998.69.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B., Brown, T., & Onsman, A. (2010). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Journal of Emergency Primary Healthcare, 8(3),1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Woofolk Hoy, A. W., Davis, H., & Pape, S. (2006). Teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and thinking. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 715–737). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. PsychologicalBulletin, 99(3),432-442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432
   Google Scholar