‘I love you, please notice me’: the hierarchical rhetoric of Twitter fandom

References

• Borchers, T., 2006. Rhetorical theory: an introduction. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., 2007. The significance of social software. In: T.N. Burg and J. Schmidt, eds. BlogTalks reloaded: social software research and cases. Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., 2003. The Internet galaxy: reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M., 2009. Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, B. and Hills, M., 2008. Restricted confessions? Blogging, subcultural celebrity and the management of producer-fan proximity. Social semiotics, 18 (2), 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• Christoph, K., Dorothée, H., and Peter, V., 2009. The video game experience as ‘true’ identification: a theory of enjoyable alterations of players’ self-perception. Communication theory, 19 (4), 351–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 2001. Defining identification: a theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass communication & society, 4 (3), 245–264.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 2003. Parasocial breakups: measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass communication & society, 6 (2), 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 2004. Parasocial break-up from favorite television characters: the role of attachment styles and relationship intensity. Journal of social and personal relationships, 21 (2), 187–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 2009a. Mediated relationships and media effects: parasocial interaction and identification. In: R.L. Nabi and M.B. Oliver, eds. The Sage handbook of media processes and effects. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 223–236.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., 2009b. When stars twitter, a ghost may be lurking. The New York Times. Available from: http://nytimes.com [Accessed 1 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Cortese, J. and Rubin, A.M., 2010. Uses and gratifications of television home shopping. Atlantic journal of communication, 18 (2), 89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., 2000. The place of media power: pilgrims and witnesses of the media age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delia, J.G., 1987. Communication research: A history. In: C.R. Berger and S.H. Chaffee, eds. Handbook of communication science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 20–98.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, R., 1991. A star is born and the construction of authenticity. In: C. Gledhill, ed. Stardom: the industry of desire. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, R., 2004. Heavenly bodies: film stars and society. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellcessor, E., 2012. Tweeting @feliciaday: online social media, convergence, and subcultural stardom. Cinema journal, 51 (2), 46–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faina, J., 2012. Twitter and the new publicity. ETC: A review of general semantics, 69 (1), 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Faulhaber, C.B., 1978. The Summa dictaminis of Guida Faba. In: J.J. Murphy, ed. Medieval eloquence: studies in the theory and practice of medieval rhetoric. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 85–111.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, E.L., et al., 2012. Why we follow: an examination of parasocial interaction and fan motivations for following athlete archetypes on Twitter. International journal of sport communication, 5, 481–502.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., 1980. Cultural studies: two paradigms. Media, culture, & society, 2, 57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. and Litt, E., 2011. The tweet smell of celebrity success: explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults. New media & society, 13 (5), 824–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C.A., 1996. Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 40 (3), 389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C.A. and Buchanan, M., 2005. Young adults’ wishful identification with television characters: the role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media psychology, 7 (4), 325–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D. and Wohl, R.R., 1956. Mass communication and parasocial interaction. Psychiatri, 19, 215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, C.A., 2011. Communication in online fan communities: the ethics of intimate strangers. Empedocles: European journal for the philosophy of communication, 2 (2), 279–289.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., 1992. Textual poachers: television fans and participatory culture. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., 2006a. Interactive audiences? In: H. Jenkins., ed. Fans, bloggers, and gamers: exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press, 134–151.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., 2006b. Afterword: the future of fandom. In: J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, and C.L. Harrington, eds. Fandom: identities and communities in a mediated world. New York: New York University Press, 357–364.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., 2008. A knight of the realm vs. the master of magnetism: Sexuality, stardom, and character branding. Popular communication, 6, 214–230.
   Google Scholar
• Kassing, J.W. and Sanderson, J., 2010. Fan-athlete interaction and Twitter: tweeting through the Giro: A case study. International journal of sport communication, 3, 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, A., 2007. The arrangement of letters: hierarchy or culture? From Cicero to China. Journal of Asian Pacific communication, 17 (2), 245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. and Oh, S.Y., 2012. To personalize or depersonalize? When and how politicians’ personalized tweets affect the public’s reactions. Journal of communication, 62, 932–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. and Shin, S.Y., 2012. When the medium is the message: how transportability moderates the effects of politicians’ Twitter communication. Communication research, 41 (8), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., 2007. Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 13, 252–275.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A.E. and boyd, d., 2011a. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society, 13 (1), 114–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A.E. and Boyd, d., 2011b. To see and be seen: celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: the international journal of research into new media technologies, 17 (2), 139–158.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M., 1964. Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Most active celebrities on Twitter, 2013. [Web log post]. Available from: http://www.boldsky.com/insync/life/2013/most-active-celebrities-twitter-032805.html [Accessed 1 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Muntean, N. and Petersen, A.H., 2009. Celebrity Twitter: strategies of intrusion and disclosure in the age of technoculture. Media/culture journal, 12 (5). Available from: http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au [Accessed 1 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J.J., 1971. Three medieval rhetorical arts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, R., 2012. The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: the role of hashtags. Discourse & communication, 6 (2), 181–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A.H., 2009. ‘We’re making our own paparazzi’: Twitter and the construction of star authenticity [Special issue]. FlowTV, 9 (14). Available from: http://flowtv.org [Accessed 1 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Postman, N., 1985. Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of television. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, T.E., 2000. Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass communication & society, 3 (1), 3–37.
   Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E., Allen, M., and Gregg, P.B., 2007. Parasocial relationships and television: a meta-analysis of the effects. In: R. Preiss, et al., eds. Mass media effects: advances through meta-analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Shefrin, E., 2004. Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, and participatory fandom: mapping new congruencies between the Internet and media entertainment culture. Critical studies in media communication, 21 (3), 261–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staiger, J., 2005. Media reception studies. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Star wars episode I: The phantom menace, 1999. Film. Directed by George Lucas. United States: Lucasfilm.
   Google Scholar
• Stever, G.S. and Lawson, K., 2013. Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: implications for the study of parasocial interaction. North American journal of psychology, 15 (2), 339–354.
   Google Scholar
• Theberge, P., 2005. Everyday fandom: fan clubs, blogging, and the quotidian rhythms of the Internet. Canadian journal of communication, 30, 485–502.
   Google Scholar
• The Lord of the Rings: The fellowship of the ring, 2001. Film. Directed by Peter Jackson. United States: Warner Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, F., 2006. From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twitter top 100: Most followers, 2013. Available from: http://twittercounter.com [Accessed 3 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• X-men, 2000. Film. Directed by Bryan Singer. United States: 20th Century Fox.
   Google Scholar