Celebrity critiquing: hot or not? Teen girls’ attitudes on and responses to the practice of negative celebrity critiquing

References

• Althaus, S.L. and Tewksbury, D., 2000. Patterns of Internet and traditional news media use in a networked community. Political communication, 17 (1), 21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., 2001. Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media psychology, 3 (3), 265–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Underwood, B., and Fromson, M.E., 1975. Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of research in personality, 9, 253–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., et al., 2001. Focus groups on social research. London: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, S. and Poo, Y.L., 2009. Media, celebrities, and fans: an examination of adolescents’ media usage and involvement with entertainment celebrities. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, 86 (1), 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmiel, A., et al., 2011. Negative emotions boost user activity at BBC forum. Physica A, 390 (16), 2936–2944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, S. and Littler, J., 2010. Celebrity and schadenfreude. Cultural studies, 24 (3), 395–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Backer, C.J.S. and Fisher, M.L., 2012. Tabloids as windows into our interpersonal relationships: a content analysis of mass media gossip from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of social, evolutionary, and cultural psychology, 6 (3), 404–424.
   Google Scholar
• den Hamer, A., Konijn, E.A., and Keijer, M.G., 2014. Cyberbullying behavior and adolescents’ use of media with antisocial content: a cyclic process model. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 17 (2), 74–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessens, O., 2012. The celebritization of society and culture: understanding the structural dynamics of celebrity culture. International journals of cultural studies, 16 (6), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubied, A. and Hanitzsch, T., 2014. Studying celebrity news. Journalism, 15 (2), 137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F., 1999. “Tabloidization” of news. A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism’. European journal of communication, 14 (3), 291–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, K., 2012. Nothing less than perfect: female celebrity, ageing and hyper-scrutiny in the gossip industry. Celebrity studies, 3 (1), 90–103.
   Google Scholar
• Festl, R. and Quandt, T., 2013. Social relations and cyberbullying: the influence of individual and structural attributes on victimization and perpetrations via the Internet. Human communication research, 39 (1), 101–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, H. and Lewis, J., 2003. Focus groups. In: J. Ritchie and J. Lewis, eds. Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. London: SAGE publications, 170–198.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Houlihan A. E., Stock, M. L. and Pomery, E. A., 2008. A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Developmental Review, 28, 29–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gies, L., 2011. Stars behaving badly. Feminist media studies, 11 (3), 347–361.
   Google Scholar
• Gorin, V. and Dubied, A., 2011. Desirable people: identifying social values through celebrity news. Media, culture & society, 33 (4), 599–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graefer, A., 2014. White stars and orange celebrities: the affective production of whiteness in humorous celebrity-gossip blogs. Celebrity studies, 5 (1–2), 107–122.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J. and Gil-White, F.J., 2001. The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and human behavior, 22 (3), 165–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermes, J., 2006. Reading gossip magazines: the imagined communities of gossip and camp. In: P.D. Marshall, ed. The celebrity culture reader. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J.W., 2007. Offline consequences of online victimization. Journal of school violence, 6 (3), 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, D., et al., 2008. “Bashing” of medical specialties: students’ experiences and recommendations’. Family medicine, 40 (6), 400–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, S., 2006. Sometimes you wanna hate celebrities. In: S. Holmes and S. Redmond, eds. Framing celebrity: new directions in celebrity culture. Oxon: Routledge, 343–358.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, S., 2008. Gossip, sport and pretty girls. What does ‘trivial’ journalism mean to tabloid newspaper readers? Journalism practice, 2 (3), 402–413.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, S., 2015. Celebrity culture and audiences: a Swedish case study. Celebrity studies, 6 (1), 54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, A.M. and Ornebring, H., 2011. User-generated content and the news. Journalism practice, 5 (2), 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R.M., et al., 2014. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological bulletin, 140, 1073–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K3 zoekt K3, 2015, VTM, Medialaan, 4 September 2015 - 6 November 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, N. and Martinez, L.S., 2008. Why celebrity bloggers are the new beauty police. In: Paper presented at the National Communication Association’s (NCA) annual meeting, November 2008 San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, P.D., 2006. Intimately intertwined in the most public way: celebrity and journalism. In: P.D. Marshall, ed. Celebrity culture reader. New York: Routledge, 315–323.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. and Boyd, D., 2011a. To see and to be seen: celebrity practice on Twitter. Journal of research into new media technologies, 17 (2), 139–158.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. and Boyd, D., 2011b. The drama! Teen conflict, gossip, and bullying in networked publics. In: A decade in internet time: symposium on the dynamics of the internet and society. Oxford, England.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall, J. and Dixon, S., 2009. Doing media 2.0. Networks, 8, 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, K., 2011. The paparazzi industry and new media: the evolving production and consumption of celebrity news and gossip websites. International journal of cultural studies, 14 (5), 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloy, J.R., Sheridan, L., and Hoffmann, J., 2008. Public figure stalking, threats, and attacks: the state of the science. In: J.R. Meloy, L. Sheridan, and J. Hoffmann, eds. Stalking, threatening, and attacking public figures. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mesch, G.S., 2009. Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Psychology and behavior, 12 (4), 287–393.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, E.A., 2010. Gossip talk and online community: celebrity gossip blogs and their audiences. Dissertation (Ph.D.). University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, L., Shute, R., and Slee, P., 2000. “Guess what I just heard!”: indirect aggression among teenage girls in Australia. Aggressive behavior, 26 (1), 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabian, S., De Backer, C.J.S., and Vandebosch, H., 2015. Dark triad personality traits and adolescent cyber-aggression. Personality and individual differences, 75, 41–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, X., et al., 2015. The ugly truth: negative gossip about celebrities and positive gossip about self entertain people in different ways. Social neuroscience, 10 (3), 37–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perren, S. and Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E., 2012. Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European journal of developmental psychology, 9 (2), 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podnieks, E., 2009. Celebrity bio blogs: hagiography, pathography, and Perez Hilton. a/b: auto/biography studies, 24 (1), 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Pornari, C.D. and Wood, J., 2010. Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive behavior, 36, 81–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzoli, T. and Gini, G., 2010. Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: the role of personality characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 38 (6), 815–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyżalski, J., 2012. From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: typology of the phenomenon. Emotional and behavioural difficulties, 17 (3–4), 305–317.
   Google Scholar
• Rajput, N. and Dhillon, R., 2013. Use of camouflage (Halo effect) in CSR initiatives: a case study of ITC and DLF. International journal of management excellence, 2 (2), 180–187.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, I. and Smith, P.K., 1994. Types of bullying behaviour and their correlates. Aggressive behavior, 20 (5), 359–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojek, C., 2001. Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze-Krumbholz, A. and Scheithauer, H., 2013. Is cyberbullying related to lack of empathy and social-emotional problems? International journal of developmental science, 7 (3–4), 161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P.K., et al., 2008. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 49 (4), 376–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M., Sud, P., and Vis, F., 2012. Commenting on YouTube video’s: from Gueatemalan rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 63 (3), 616–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E.L., 1920. A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of applied psychology, 4 (1), 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Tokunaga, R.S., 2010. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in human behavior, 26 (3), 277–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, G., 1999. Tabloidization, journalism and the possibility of critique. International journal of cultural studies, 2 (1), 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G., 2010. Approaching celebrity studies. Celebrity studies, 1 (1), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G., 2014. Is celebrity news, news? Journalism, 15 (2), 144–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bulck, H. and Claessens, N., 2014. Of local and global fame: a comparative analysis of news items and audience reactions on celebrity news websites People, Heat, and HLN. Journalism, 15 (2), 218–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bulck, H., Paulussen, S., and Bels, A., 2015. Celebrity als nieuwswaarde. Een analyse van celebritynieuws in Vlaamse kranten en ontspanningsweekbladen. Nieuwsmonitor Steunpunt Media, November. Available from: http://www.steunpuntmedia.be/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Nieuwsmonitor-25.pdf [Accessed 15 February 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, B., 2014. It takes two to tango: the relationship between the press and celebrities in Belgium. Celebrity studies, 5 (4), 423–437.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, M., 2010. Female celebrities and the media: the gendered denigration of the “ordinary” celebrity. Celebrity studies, 1 (1), 118–120.
   Google Scholar
• X Factor, UK, 2010, ITV, ITV Network Limited, 21 August 2010–12 December 2010.
   Google Scholar