Strength and durability studies on sustainable eco-friendly green solid blocks

References

• ASTM C 67-standard test methods for sampling and testing brick and structural clay tile. ASTM INTERNATIONAL.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, T., and K. Marar. 1996. Effects of crushed stone dust on some properties of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 26 (7):1121–30. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(96)00078-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çiçek, T., and Y. Cincin. 2015. Use of fly ash in production of light-weight building bricks. Construction and Building Materials 94:521–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeda Christy and Tensing. 2011. Greener building material with flyash C. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) 12: 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• IS 2185 (Part 1). 2005. Concrete masonry units - specification part 1 hollow and solid concrete blocks. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• IS 383. 2016. Coarse and fine aggregate for concrete-specification. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• IS456. 2000. Plain and reinforced concrete - code of practice. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Jitendra, K., and V. C. Khed. 2020. Optimization of concrete blocks with high volume fly ash and foundry sand. Materials Today: Proceedings 27 (2):1172–79.
   Google Scholar
• Kannan Rajkumar, P. R., K. Divya Krishnan, C. Sudha, P. T. Ravichandran, and T. D. Vigneshwaran. 2016. Study on use of industrial waste in preparation of green bricks. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 9 (5):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar Ashish, D., S. Kumar Verma, J. Singh, and N. Sharma. 2018. Strength and durability characteristics of bricks made using coal bottom and coal fly ash. Advances in Concrete Construction 6 (4):407–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumarasamy, V., R. Sampath, and S. Kandasamy. 2021. Experimental study on hardened mechanical and durability properties of industrial ash bricks. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering 1–8. doi:10.1007/s40996-021-00783-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokeshwari, M., and K. S. Jagadish. 2016. Eco-friendly use of granite fines waste in building blocks. Procedia Environmental Sciences 35:618–23. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.049.
   Google Scholar
• Naganathan, S., A. Yousef Omer Mohamed, and K. Nasharuddin Mustapha. 2015. Performance of bricks made using fly ash and bottom ash. Construction and Building Materials 96:576–80. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. E. 1987. Properties of clay-sand-rice husk ash mixed bricks. International Journal of Cement Composites and Lightweight Concrete 9 (2):105–08. doi:10.1016/0262-5075(87)90026-1.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. E. 2014. Performance of masonry blocks incorporating palm oil fuel ash. Journal of Cleaner Production 78:195–201. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romualdo, R., A. Menezes, S. Heber, B. Ferreira, A. Gelmires, B. Neves, L. Helio de, B. Lira, C. Heber, and B. Ferreira. 2005. Use of granite sawing wastes in the production of ceramic bricks and tiles. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 25:1149–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandra Espuelasa, E., O. Sandra, M. Joshua, E. Sara, A. Maria, and A. Seco. 2017. Magnesium oxide as alternative binder for unfired clay bricks manufacturing. Applied Clay Science 146:23–26. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2017.05.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., R. Nagar, V. Agrawal, A. Rana, and A. Tiwari. 2016. Sustainable utilization of granite cutting waste in high strength concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production 116:223–35. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudharsan, N., and T. Palanisamy. 2018. A comprehensive study on potential use of waste materials in brick for sustainable development. Ecology, Environment and Conservation 24:S339–S343.
   Google Scholar
• Sudharsan, N., T. Palanisamy, and S. C. Yaragal. 2018. Environmental sustainability of waste glass as a valuable construction material - A critical review. Ecology, Environment and Conservation 24:S331–S338.
   Google Scholar
• Sureshchandra, H. S., G. Sarangapani, and B. G. Naresh Kumar. 2014. Experimental investigation on the effect of replacement of sand by quarry dust in hollow concrete block for different mix proportions. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 5 (1):15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Turgut, P. 2005. Lime stone dust and glass powder as new brick material. Materials and Sciences 41:805–13.
   Google Scholar
• Turgut, P. 2012. Manufacturing of building bricks without Portland cement. Journal of Cleaner Production 37:361–67. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidhya, K., and Kandasamy. 2016. Experimental investigations on the properties of coal ash brick units as Green building materials. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization 36 (6):318–25. doi:10.1080/19392699.2015.1118379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidhya, K., and S. Kandasamy. 2013. Study on properties of bricks manufactured using fly ash and pond ash. Pollution Research 32 (2):405–09.
   Google Scholar
• Vidhya, K., and S. Kandasamy. 2014. Study on the flexural strength of coal ash brick masonry wall elements. Journal of Structural Engineering (India) 41 (4):410–19.
   Google Scholar
• Westgate, P., R. J. Ball, and K. Paine. 2019. Olivine as a reactive aggregate in lime mortars. Construction and Building Materials 195:115–26. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winarno, S., A. Wismadi, P. A. P. Agustiananda, M. Fauziah, B. Kushari, A. Nurmiyanto, and J. A. Fajri. 2019. Comparative strength and cost of rice husk concrete block. 2019. MATEC Web of Conferences 280:04002. doi:10.1051/matecconf/201928004002.
   Google Scholar