References
- Abbott, R. (2016). I think, therefore i invent: Creative computers and the future of patent law. Boston College Law Review 57(4), 1079-1126/2. https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol57/iss4/2.
- Abraham, K. (2017). The forms and functions of tort law. West Academic.
- Aristodemou, L., & Tietze, F. (2018). The state-of-the-art on intellectual property analytics (IPA): A literature review on artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods for analysing intellectual property (IP) data. World Patent Information, 55, 37–51, . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2018.07.002
- Ayres, R. (2006). Book Review -The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, Ray Kurzweil, Viking Penguin, New York (2005), 602 pages plus index. Technological forecasting and social change. Vol. 73(2), 95–127, . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.12.002
- Barfield, W. (2018). Liability for autonomous and artificially intelligent robots. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 9(1), 193–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2018-0018
- Boden, M. A. (1994). Chapter 4: What is Creativity? Boden, M. A. Dimensions of Creativity A Bradford book (Cambridge, Mass. u.a.: MIT Press) 242, 0262023687. .
- Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 40 Years Later, 103(1–2), 347–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-1
- Bridy, A. (2016). Coding creativity: Copyright and the artificially intelligent author Preprint. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/5ru6m
- Bringsjord, S., & Govindarajulu, N. S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Zalta, Edward N.)The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Summer 2020 (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University). Retrieved August 8, 2020, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/artificial-intelligence/
- Carriço, G. (2018). The EU and artificial intelligence: A human-centred perspective. European View, 17(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685818764821
- Castets-Renard, C. (2020). The intersection between AI and IP: Conflict or complementarity? IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 51(2), 141–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-00908-z
- Clifford, R. D. (1997). Intellectual property in the era of the creative computer program: Will the true creator please stand up. Tulane Law Review 71. 1675. https://scholarship.law.umassd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=fac_pubs.
- Cummins, J. D., Phillips, R. D., & Weiss, M. A. (2001). The incentive effects of no‐fault automobile insurance. The Journal of Law & Economics, 44 (2), 427–464. JSTOR. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/322818
- Davies, C. R. (2011). An evolutionary step in intellectual property rights – Artificial intelligence and intellectual property. Computer Law & Security Review, 27(6), 601–619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2011.09.006
- Davis, K., Christodoulou, J., Seider, S., & Gardner, H. (2011). Chapter 24: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences Sternberg, R.J., Kaufman, S.B., In Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. (Cambridge University Press). (pp. 485–503). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317388610_The_Theory_of_Multiple_Intelligences
- Delvaux, M. (2017). Report with recommendations to the commission on civil law rules on robotics (2015/2103(INL)) (P8_TA(2017)0051). European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.pdf
- EU. (2017). European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). 19. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017IP0051&from=EN
- Federal Ministry of Justice, Act on Copyright and Related Rights (Urheberrechtsgesetz – UrhG) (Federal Ministry of Justice). (1965). Retrieved August 9, 2020, from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_urhg/englisch_urhg.html
- Guadamuz, A. (2017 Do Androids Dream of Electric Copyright? Comparative analysis of originality in artificial intelligence generated works). Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2, 169–186 . 20. Retrieved August 8, 2020. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/66693/3/Do%20Androids%20Dream%20of%20Electric%20Copyright.pdf
- Gürkaynak, G. et al (2017). Questions of Intellectual Property in the Artificial Intelligence Realm, Robotics Law Journal. 3. https://roboticslawjournal.com. Retrieved August 8, 2020, from https://www.gurkaynak.av.tr/docs/8b791-rlj-september-october-2017-.pdf
- Hettingerin, E. C. (1989). Justifying intellectual property. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 18(1), 32–52. http://hettingern.people.cofc.edu/Hettinger%20-%20Justifying%20Intellectual%20Property.pdf
- High Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG). (2018). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation/guidelines
- Hojnik, J. et al (2019). Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Communications 5, 61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0278-x
- Hristov, K. (2017). Artificial intelligence and the copyright dilemma. IDEA - The Journal of the Franklin Pierce Center of Intellectual Property : The IP Law Review, 57(3), 431–454. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2976428
- Hubbard, F. P. (2014). “Sophisticated robots”: Balancing liability, regulation, and innovation. Florida Law Review Retrieved August 8, 2020, Retrieved. 66(5), 1803. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2027&context=law_facpub
- Hylton, K. (2013). The law and economics of products liability. Notre Dame Law Review, 88(5), 2457. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol88/iss5/14
- Ihalainen, J. (2018). Computer creativity: Artificial intelligence and copyright. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 13(9), 724–728. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpy031
- Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable Algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Retrieved May 16, 2020, Retrieved. 165(3), 633. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/penn_law_review/vol165/iss3/3/
- Liao, Y.-P. (2002). No-fault for motor vehicles: An economic analysis. American Law and Economics Association, 4(2), 258–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/4.2.258
- Menell, P. S. (1994). The challenges of reforming intellectual property protection for computer software. Columbia Law Review, 94(8), 2644–2654. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1944599.
- Nilsson, N. J. (2009). The quest for artificial intelligence: A history of ideas and achievements. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819346
- Office, E. P. 1973. Article 52(2)(c), Patentable inventions—The European Patent Convention (European Patent Office). Retrieved August 9, 2020, from https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/epc/2016/e/ar52.html
- Office, E. P. (1973). Article 53, Exceptions to Patentability—The European Patent Convention (European Patent Office). Retrieved August 9, 2020, from https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/epc/2016/e/ar53.html
- Office, E. P. (1973). Article 58, Entitlement to file an European Patent application—The European Patent Convention (European Patent Office). Retrieved August 9, 2020, from https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/epc/2016/e/ar58.html
- Office, E. P. (1973). Article 60, Right to a European Patent—The European Patent Convention (European Patent Office). Retrieved August 9, 2020, from https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/epc/2016/e/ar60.html
- Office, E. P. (2020). EPO Guidelines for Examination (European Patent Office). Retrieved August 8, 2020, from https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/guidelines/e/j.htm
- Office, E. P. (2020). EPO Guidelines for Examination 3.3.1 - Artificial intelligence and machine learning (European Patent Office). Retrieved August 9, 2020, from https://www.epo.org/law-practice/legal-texts/html/guidelines2018/e/g_ii_3_3_1.htm
- Open Letter to the European Commission: Artificial Intelligence And Robotics. (2018). Retrieved August 8, 2020, from https://g8fip1kplyr33r3krz5b97d1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/RoboticsOpenLetter.pdf
- Owen, D. G. (2007). The five elements of negligence. Hofstra Law Review, 35(4) , 1671-1686. http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol35/iss4/1
- Pennachin, C., & Goertzel, B. (2007). Contemporary approaches to artificial general intelligence. In B. Goertzel & C. Pennachin (Eds.), Artificial general intelligence (pp. 1–30). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68677-4_1
- Plucker, J., Beghetto, R., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
- Robinson, W. K. (2016). Economic theory, divided infringement, and enforcing interactive patents. Economic Theory, 67(6), 1961–2030. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol67/iss6/3
- Russell, S. J., Norvig, P., & Davis, E. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. https://people.cs.umass.edu/~pinar/ai-a-modern-approach.pdf
- Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man their nature and measurement. Nature, 120(3014), 181–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/120181a0
- Sternberg, R. J. (2012). Intelligence. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 14 (1), 19–27. PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22577301
- Stone, P., Brooks, R., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., & Hager, G. (2016). Artificial intelligence and life in 2030. [ One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 Study Panel]. Stanford University. https://ai100.sites.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj9861/f/ai100report10032016fnl_singles.pdf
- Strömholm, C. (2009). Infopaq International v Danske Dagblades Forening, 28. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62008CJ0005&from=EN
- The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation, Federal Act of 25 June 1954 on Patents for Inventions (Patents Act, PatA) (The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation). (1954). AccessedRetrieved August 9, 2020, from https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1955/871_893_899/en
- The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation, 1992 Federal Act on Copyright and Related Rights (Copyright Act, CopA) (The Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation). Accessed 03 April 2022 https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1993/1798_1798_1798/en
- UK Government. (1988a). Section 9(1), Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 398. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/pdfs/ukpga_19880048_en.pdf
- UK Government. (1988b). Section 9(3), Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 398. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/pdfs/ukpga_19880048_en.pdf
- UK Government. (1988c). Section 178, Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 398. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/pdfs/ukpga_19880048_en.pdf
- United States. (1976). Copyright Law of the United States and Related Laws Contained in Title 17 of the United States Code. https://www.copyright.gov/title17/title17.pdf
- USPTO, . (2020). United States Code Title 35—Patents (United States Patent and Trademark Office). Retrieved August 11, 2020, from https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/consolidated_laws.pdf
- WEF. (2018). Artificial intelligence collides with patent law [White Paper]. WEF, Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_48540_WP_End_of_Innovation_Protecting_Patent_Law.pdf
- WIPO, 2019. WIPO Technology Trends 2019 - Artificial Intelligence. (World Intellectual Property Organization). 154: 9789280530070. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.29084 doi:https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.29084.
- Yampolskiy, R. V., & Duettmann, A. (2020). Artificial superintelligence: Coordination and strategy. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/books/pdfview/book/2257