Cleavage-stage embryo micromanipulation in the clinical setting

References

• Alikani M, Olivennes F, Cohen J. 1993. Fertilization and early embryology: microsurgical correction of partially degenerate mouse embryos promotes hatching and restores their viability. Hum Reprod. 8:1723–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alikani M, Cohen J, Tomkin G, Garrisi GJ, Mack C, Scott RT. 1999. Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation. Fertil Steril. 71:836–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2004. Embryo splitting for infertility treatment. Fertil Steril. 82:256–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antinori S, Panci C, Selman H, Caffa B, Dani G, Versaci C. 1996. Zona thinning with the use of laser: a new approach to assisted hatching in humans. Hum Reprod. 11:590–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston KI, Weimer KE. 2010. Micromanipulation of human oocytes and embryos: applications of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and assisted hatching in infertility treatment. reproductive endocrinology and infertility. New York: Springer; p. 601–612.
   Google Scholar
• Balaban B, Urman B, Alatas C, Mercan R, Mumcu A, Isiklar A. 2002. A comparison of four different techniques of assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 17:1239–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie D, Beyer C, Osborne E, Kralevski V, Rasi S, Osianlis T. 2012. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for chromosome rearrangements–one blastomere biopsy versus two blastomere biopsy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 29:821–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang L-J, Huang -C-C, Tsai -Y-Y, Hung -C-C, Fang M-Y, Lin Y-C, Su Y-N, Chen S-U, Yang Y-S. 2013. Blastocyst biopsy and vitrification are effective for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic diseases. Hum Reprod. 28:1435–1444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Scarica C, Palagiano A, Canipari R, Rienzi L. 2016. The impact of biopsy on human embryo developmental potential during preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H, Malter H, Massey J, Mayer MP, Wiemer K. 1990. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod. 5:7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1991. Assisted hatching of human embryos. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 8:179–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen J, Alikani M, Trowbridge J, Rosenwaks Z. 1992. Implantation enhancement by selective assisted hatching using zona drilling of human embryos with poor prognosis. Hum Reprod. 7:685–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Feldberg D. 1991. Effects of the size and number of zona pellucida openings on hatching and trophoblast outgrowth in the mouse embryo. Mol Reprod Dev. 30:70–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S, Blake D, Farquhar C, Seif MM. 2009. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF and ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2:CD001894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos A, Staessen C, De Rycke M, Verpoest W, Haentjens P, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van De Velde H. 2009. Impact of cleavage-stage embryo biopsy in view of PGD on human blastocyst implantation: a prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 24:2988–2896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean W, Lucifero D, Santos F. 2005. DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 75:98–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dupont C, Armant DR, Brenner CA. 2009. Epigenetics: definition, mechanisms and clinical perspective. Semin Reprod Med. 20:164–170.
   Google Scholar
• Ebner T. 2010. Micromanipulation Techniques in IVF. J Reprod Biotech Fertil. 1:108–119.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott TA, Colturato LFA, Taylor TH, Wright G, Kort HI, Nagy ZP. 2007. Lysed cell removal promotes frozen–thawed embryo development. Fertil Steril. 87:1444–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribá M, Valbuena D, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Simón C. 2002. New techniques on embryo manipulation. J Reprod Immunol. 55:149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang C, Li T, Miao B-Y, Zhuang G-L, Zhou C. 2010. Mechanically expanding the zona pellucida of human frozen thawed embryos: a new method of assisted hatching. Fertil Steril. 94:1302–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathi R, Valojerdi MR, Eftekhari-Yazdi P. 2008. Effect of laser-assisted hatching and necrotic blastomere removal on the development of vitrified–warmed four-cell mouse embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 25:333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong CY, Bongso A, Ng SC, Kumar J, Trounson A, Ratnam S. 1998. Blastocyst transfer after enzymatic treatment of the zona pellucida: improving in-vitro fertilization and understanding implantation. Hum Reprod. 13:2926–2932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh J, Coutifaris C, Sapienza C, Mainigi M. 2017. Global DNA methylation levels are altered by modifiable clinical manipulations in assisted reproductive technologies. Clin Epigenetics. 9:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales D, Jones J, Pinyopummintr T, Carnevale E, Ginther O, Shapiro S, Bavister BD. 1996. Implantation: trophectoderm projections: a potential means for locomotion, attachment and implantation of bovine, equine and human blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 11:2739–2745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens V, De Rycke M, De Vos A, Staessen C, Michiels A, Verpoest W, Van Steirteghem A, Bertrand C, Liebaers I, Devroey P, et al. 2008. Diagnostic efficiency, embryonic development and clinical outcome after the biopsy of one or two blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 23:481–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco E, Biricik A, Cotarelo RP, Iammarone E, Rubino P, Tesarik J, Fiorentino F, Minasi MG. 2015. Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst. SpringerPlus. 4:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JL, Engel D, Gindoff PR, Mottla G, Stillman R. 1993. Experimental cloning of human polyploid embryos using an artificial zona pellucida. Fertil Steril. 61:S1.
   Google Scholar
• Halvaei I, Khalili MA, Safari S, Esfandiari N. 2015. Ongoing pregnancies following cosmetic micromanipulation of preimplantation embryos in patients with implantation failure. Case Rep Med. 2015:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Halvaei I, Khalili MA, Esfandiari N, Safari S, Talebi AR, Miglietta S, Nottola SA. 2016a. Ultrastructure of cytoplasmic fragments in human cleavage stage embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 33:1677–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvaei I, Khalili MA, Nottola SA. 2016b. A novel method for transmission electron microscopy study of cytoplasmic fragments from preimplantation human embryos. Microsc Res Tech. 79:459–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamatani T, Ko M, Yamada M, Kuji N, Mizusawa Y, Shoji M, Hada T, Asada H, Maruyama T, Yoshimura Y. 2006. Global gene expression profiling of preimplantation embryos. Hum Cell. 19:98–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammadeh ME, Fischer-Hammadeh C, Ali KR. 2011. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction: a state of the art. J Assist Reprod Genet. 28:119–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. 2013. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 19:330–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harton G, Magli M, Lundin K, Montag M, Lemmen J, Harper J. 2011. ESHRE PGD Consortium/Embryology Special Interest Group—best practice guidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS). Hum Reprod. 26:41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YY, Huang CC, Cheng TC, Chang CC, Tsai HD, Lee MS. 2002. Laser-assisted hatching of embryos is better than the chemical method for enhancing the pregnancy rate in women with advanced age. Fertil Steril. 78:179–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illmensee K, Levanduski M, Vidali A, Husami N, Goudas VT. 2010. Human embryo twinning with applications in reproductive medicine. Fertil Steril. 93:423–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illmensee K, Levanduski M. 2010. Embryo splitting. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 15:57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Isik A, Vicdan K, Kaba A, Dagli G. 2000. Comparison of zona manipulated and zona intact blastocyst transfers: a prospective randomized trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 17:135–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D, Paczkowski M, Kuehl T. 2015. Embryo manipulation techniques alter pre-implantation development and gene expression in mouse embryos. Reproduction, Reprod Fertil Dev. 28:182.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard K, Hindkjaer JJ, Ingerslev HJ. 2012. Human embryonic development after blastomere removal: a time-lapse analysis. Hum Reprod. 27:97–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerner MV, Barlow DP. 2010. Genomic imprinting—an epigenetic gene-regulatory model. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 20:164–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kort J, Behr B. 2017. Biomechanics and developmental potential of oocytes and embryos. Fertil Steril. 108:738–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu WX, Zheng Y, Luo MJ, Huang P, Yue LM, Wang L, He Y-P, Zhang J-H. 2005. Effects of removal of necrotic blastomeres from mouse cryopreserved embryos on blastocyst formation and hatching. Theriogenology. 64:1114–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malter HE. 2016. Micromanipulation in assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biomed Online. 32:339–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malter HE, Cohen J. 1989. Partial zona dissection of the human oocyte: a nontraumatic method using micromanipulation to assist zona pellucida penetration. Fertil Steril. 51:139–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour R, Rhodes C, Aboulghar M, Serour G, Kamal A. 2000. Transfer of zona-free embryos improves outcome in poor prognosis patients: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 15:1061–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchesi DE, Qiao J, Feng HL. 2012. Embryo manipulation and imprinting. Semin Reprod Med. 30:323–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins WP, Rocha IA, Ferriani RA, Nastri CO. 2011. Assisted hatching of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hum Reprod Update. 17:438–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezo Y, Dale B, Elder K. 2017. Time to re-evaluate ART protocols in the light of advances in knowledge about methylation and epigenetics: an opinion paper. Hum Fertil. 25:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Miyata H, Matsubayashi H, Fukutomi N, Matsuba J, Koizumi A, Tomiyama T. 2010. Relevance of the site of assisted hatching in thawed human blastocysts: a preliminary report. Fertil Steril. 94:2444–2447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moutou C, Goossens V, Coonen E, De Rycke M, Kokkali G, Renwick P, SenGupta SB, Vesela K, Traeger-Synodinos J. 2014. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XII: cycles from January to December 2009 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2010. Hum Reprod. 29:880–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Wells D, Cohen J. 2010. Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Fertil Steril. 94:408–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama T, Fujiwara H, Tastumi K, Fujita K, Higuchi T, Mori T. 1998. A new assisted hatching technique using a piezo-micromanipulator. Fertil Steril. 69:784–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama T, Fujiwara H, Yamada S, Tastumi K, Honda T, Fujii S. 1999. Clinical application of a new assisted hatching method using a piezo-micromanipulator for morphologically low-quality embryos in poor-prognosis infertile patients. Fertil Steril. 71:1014–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols J, Gardner R. 1989. Effect of damage to the zona pellucida on development of preimplantation embryos in the mouse. Hum Reprod. 4:180–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemitz EL, Feinberg AP. 2004. Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation. Am J Hum Genet. 74:599–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijs M, Vanderzwalman P, Bertin G. 1992. Pregnancies obtained after zona softening of in vitro cultured or frozen–thawed human embryos. Hum Reprod. 7:82.
   Google Scholar
• Noli L, Dajani Y, Capalbo A, Bvumbe J, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM, Ogilvie C, Khalaf Y, Ilic D. 2015. Developmental clock compromises human twin model created by embryo splitting. Hum Reprod. 30:2774–2784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noli L, Ogilvie C, Khalaf Y, Ilic D. 2017. Potential of human twin embryos generated by embryo splitting in assisted reproduction and research. Hum Reprod Update. 23:156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan CM, Liu SY, Karpinka JB, Rancourt DE. 2002. Embryonic hatching enzyme strypsin/ISP1 is expressed with ISP2 in endometrial glands during implantation. Mol Reprod Dev. 62:328–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. 1992. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. The Lancet. 340:17–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Ozturk O, Serour G, Templeton A. 2009. Number of embryos for transfer following in‐vitro fertilisation or intra‐cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 15:CD003416.
   Google Scholar
• Pantos K, Kokkali G, Petroutsou K, Lekka K, Malligiannis P, Koratzis A. 2009. Monochorionic triplet and monoamniotic twins gestation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and laser-assisted hatching. Fetal Diagn Ther. 25:144–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao J, Chen Y, Yan LY, Yan J, Liu P, Sun QY. 2010. Changes in histone methylation during human oocyte maturation and IVF-or ICSI-derived embryo development. Fertil Steril. 93:1628–1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razi MH, Halvaei I, Razi Y. 2013. Laser assisted zona hatching does not improve live birth rate in patients undergoing their first ICSI cycles. Iran J Reprod Med. 11:1021–1026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rienzi L, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi F, Iacobelli M, Anniballo R, Tesarik J, Greco E. 2002. Laser-assisted removal of necrotic blastomeres from cryopreserved embryos that were partially damaged. Fertil Steril. 77:1196–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Iacobelli M, Minasi MG, Romano S, Ferrero S, Sapienza F, Baroni E, Tesarik J, Greco E. 2005. Developmental potential of fully intact and partially damaged cryopreserved embryos after laser-assisted removal of necrotic blastomeres and post-thaw culture selection. Fertil Steril. 84:888–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy M-C, Dupras C, Ravitsky V. 2017. The epigenetic effects of assisted reproductive technologies: ethical considerations. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 8:436–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio C, Giménez C, Fernández E, Vendrell X, Velilla E, Parriego M, Rodrigo L. 2009. The importance of good practice in preimplantation genetic screening: critical viewpoints. Hum Reprod. 24:2045–2047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari S, Khalili MA, Barekati Z, Halvaei I, Anvari M, Nottola SA. 2017. Cosmetic micromanipulation of vitrified-warmed cleavage stage embryos does not improve ART outcomes: an ultrastructural study of fragments. Reprod Biol. 17:210–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampino S, Zacchini F, Swiergiel A, Modlinski A, Loi P, Ptak G. 2014. Effects of blastomere biopsy on post-natal growth and behavior in mice. Hum Reprod. 29:1875–1883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathananthan H, Gunasheela S, Menezes J. 2003. Mechanics of human blastocyst hatching in vitro. Reproductive Biomed Online. 7:228–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Burnett NM, Wilcox LS. 2000. Does assisted hatching pose a risk for monozygotic twinning in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 74:288–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiewe MC, Hazeleger NL, Sclimenti C, Balmaceda JP. 1995. Physiological characterization of blastocyst hatching mechanisms by use of a mouse antihatching model. Fertil Steril. 63:288–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmoll F, Schneider H, Montag M, Wimmers K, Rink K, Schellander K. 2003. Effects of different laser-drilled openings in the zona pellucida on hatching of in vitro–produced cattle blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 80:714–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoolcraft WB, Schlenker T, Gee M, Jones GS, Jones HW. 1994. Assisted hatching in the treatment of poor prognosis in vitro fertilization candidates. Fertil Steril. 62:551–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott KL, Hong KH, Scott RT. 2013b. Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Fertil Steril. 100:608–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. 2013a. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 100:624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugawara A, Sato B, Bal E, Collier AC, Ward MA. 2012. Blastomere removal from cleavage-stage mouse embryos alters steroid metabolism during pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 87:4,1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadir Y, Wright W, Vafa O, Liaw L, Asch R, Berns M. 1991. Micromanipulation of gametes using laser microbeams. Hum Reprod. 6:1011–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadir Y, Douglas‐Hamilton DH. 2007. Laser effects in the manipulation of human eggs and embryos for in vitro fertilization. Methods Cell Biol. 82:409–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao J, Tamis R. 1997. Application of assisted hatching for 2-day-old, frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a poor-prognosis population. J Assist Reprod Genet. 14:128–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor TH, Gilchrist JW, Hallowell SV, Hanshew KK, Orris JJ, Glassner MJ, Wininger JD. 2010. The effects of different laser pulse lengths on the embryo biopsy procedure and embryo development to the blastocyst stage. J Assist Reprod Genet. 27:663–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker MJ, Luecke NM, Wiker SR, Wright G. 1993. Chemical removal of the outside of the zona pellucida of day 3 human embryos has no impact on implantation rate. J Assist Reprod Genet. 10:187–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura-Juncá P, Irarrázaval I, Rolle AJ, Gutiérrez JI, Moreno RD, Santos MJ. 2015. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in mammals: epigenetic and developmental alterations. Scientific and bioethical implications for IVF in humans. Biol Res. 48:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera-Rodriguez M, Rubio C. 2017. Assessing the true incidence of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 107:1107–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington CH. 1942. The epigenotype. Endeavour. 1:18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Weissman A, Shoham G, Shoham Z, Fishel S, Leong M, Yaron Y. 2017. Chromosomal mosaicism detected during preimplantation genetic screening: results of a worldwide Web-based survey. Ferti Steril. 107:1092–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells D, Delhanty JD. 2000. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod. 6:1055–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood C. 2001. Embryo splitting: a role in infertility? Reprod Fertil Dev. 13:91–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CT, Morris J. 2001. Genes, genetics, and epigenetics: a correspondence. Science. 293:1103–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Wu J, Fan Y, Lv Z, Guo X, Zhao C, Zhou R, Zhang Z, Wang F, Xiao M, et al. 2009. Evaluation of blastomere biopsy using a mouse model indicates the potential high risk of neurodegenerative disorders in the offspring. Mol Cell Proteomics. 8:1490–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar