Clinical and neonatal outcomes of intrauterine insemination with frozen donor sperm

References

• Alfredsson JH. 1984. Artificial insemination with frozen semen. Sex ratio at birth. Int J Fertil. 29:152–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arcos-Machancoses JV, Reina PM, Martinez F, Busselo MJ, Perez-Aytes A. 2015. Silver-Rusell syndrome caused by epigenetic alteration in a child conceived by intrauterine insemination from donor sperm. Am J Med Genet A. 167A:2861–2864.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aurich C, Schreiner B, Ille N, Alvarenga M, Scarlet D. 2016. Cytosine methylation of sperm DNA in horse semen after cryopreservation. Theriogenology. 86:1347–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belva F, De Schrijver F, Tournaye H, Liebaers I, Devroey P, Haentjens P, Bonduelle M. 2011. Neonatal outcome of 724 children born after ICSI using non-ejaculated sperm. Hum Reprod. 26:1752–1758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bungum M, Humaidan P, Axmon A, Spano M, Bungum L, Erenpreiss J, Giwercman A. 2007. Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome. Hum Reprod. 22:174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Saha D, Niemann H, Gryshkov O, Glasmacher B, Hofmann N. 2017. Effects of cryopreservation on the epigenetic profile of cells. Cryobiology. 74:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Xu Z, Zhang N, Wang B, Chen H, Wang S, Sun H. 2014. Neonatal outcome of early rescue ICSI and ICSI with ejaculated sperm. J Assist Reprod Genet. 31:823–828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XJ, Wu LP, Lan HL, Zhang L, Zhu YM. 2012. Clinical variables affecting the pregnancy rate of intracervical insemination using cryopreserved donor spermatozoa: a retrospective study in China. Int J Fertil Steril. 6:179–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das M, Al-Hathal N, San-Gabriel M, Phillips S, Kadoch I-J, Bissonnette F, Holzer H, Zini A. 2013. High prevalence of isolated sperm DNA damage in infertile men with advanced paternal age. J Assist Reprod Genet. 30:843–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geyter C, De Geyter M, Steimann S, Zhang H, Holzgreve W. 2006. Comparative birth weights of singletons born after assisted reproduction and natural conception in previously infertile women. Hum Reprod. 21:705–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBaun MR, Niemitz EL, Feinberg AP. 2003. Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19. Am J Hum Genet. 72:156–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan H-T, Zheng Y, Wang -J-J, Meng T-Q, Xia W, Hu S-H, Xiong C-L, Rao M. 2016. Relationship between donor sperm parameters and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination: analysis of 2821 cycles in 1355 couples. Andrologia. 48:29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, De Klerk N, Bower C. 2013. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 19:330–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy DL, Breheny S, Halliday J, Jaques A, Rushford D, Garrett C, Talbot JM, Baker HWG. 2010. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod. 25:265–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen AA, Wennerholm UB, Gissler M, Romundstad LB, Nygren KG, Tiitinen A, Skjaerven R, Nyboe Andersen A, Lidegaard Ø, Forman JL, et al. 2014. Risk of stillbirth and infant deaths after assisted reproductive technology: a Nordic study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod. 29:1090–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra SK, Ratcliffe SJ, Coutifaris C, Molinaro T, Barnhart KT. 2011. Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol. 118:863–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalthur G, Adiga SK, Upadhya D, Rao S, Kumar P. 2008. Effect of cryopreservation on sperm DNA integrity in patients with teratospermia. Fertil Steril. 89:1723–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kop PA, Van Wely M, Mol BW, De Melker AA, Janssens PM, Arends B, Curfs MHJM, Kortman M, Nap A, Rijnders E, et al. 2015. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study. Hum Reprod. 30:603–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi Setti PE, Albani E, Morenghi E, Morreale G, Delle Piane L, Scaravelli G, Patrizio P. 2013. Comparative analysis of fetal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies from fresh and cryopreserved/thawed oocytes in the same group of patients. Fertil Steril. 100:396–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Lin Q, Liu R, Xiao W, Liu W. 2010. Protective effects of ascorbate and catalase on human spermatozoa during cryopreservation. J Androl. 31:437–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S. 2013. Elective frozen replacement cycles for all: ready for prime time? Hum Reprod. 28:6–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. 2012. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 98:368–377.e1-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak W, Kondapalli LA, Celia G, Gordon J, DiMattina M, Payson M. 2016. Natural cycle IVF reduces the risk of low birthweight infants compared with conventional stimulated IVF. Hum Reprod. 31:789–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkinen S, Söderström-Anttila V, Vainio J, Suikkari A-M, Tuuri T. 2013. Does long in vitro culture promote large for gestational age babies? Hum Reprod. 28:828–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malchau SS, Loft A, Henningsen AK, Nyboe Andersen A, Pinborg A. 2014. Perinatal outcomes in 6,338 singletons born after intrauterine insemination in Denmark, 2007 to 2012: the influence of ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril. 102:1110–1116.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin EA, Ford WC, Hull MG. 1992. Motility characteristics and membrane integrity of cryopreserved human spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 95:527–534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordqvist S, Sydsjö G, Lampic C, Åkerud H, Elenis E, Skoog Svanberg A. 2014. Sexual orientation of women does not affect outcome of fertility treatment with donated sperm. Hum Reprod. 29:704–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombelet W. 2013. Evidence-based recommendations for IUI in daily practice. Middle Fertil Soc J. 18:74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ombelet W, Campo R, Bosmans E, Nijs M. 2008. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a first-line treatment in developing countries and methodological aspects that might influence IUI success. Human Reprod. 2008:64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Petrussa L, Van De Velde H, De Rycke M. 2014. Dynamic regulation of DNA methyltransferases in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos after assisted reproductive technologies. Mol Hum Reprod. 20:861–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer S, Goldberg J, McClure R, Lobo R, Thomas M, Widra E. 2013. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 99:47–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Henningsen AA, Loft A, Malchau SS, Forman J, Andersen AN. 2014. Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique? Hum Reprod. 29:618–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Loft A, Romundstad LB, Wennerholm U-B, Söderström-Anttila V, Bergh C, Aittomäki K. 2016. Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technologies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 95:10–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeednia S, Shabani Nashtaei M, Bahadoran H, Aleyasin A, Amidi F. 2016. Effect of nerve growth factor on sperm quality in asthenozoosprmic men during cryopreservation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 14:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagot P, Bechoua S, Ferdynus C, Facy A, Flamm X, Gouyon JB, Jimenez C. 2012. Similarly increased congenital anomaly rates after intrauterine insemination and IVF technologies: a retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 27:902–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid TE, Eskenazi B, Baumgartner A, Marchetti F, Young S, Weldon R, Anderson D, Wyrobek AJ. 2007. The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in healthy non-smokers. Hum Reprod. 22:180–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. 2011. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 96:344–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih W, Rushford DD, Bourne H, Garrett C, McBain JC, Healy DL, Baker HWG. 2008. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection. Hum Reprod. 23:1644–1653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarín JJ, García-Pérez MA, Cano A. 2015. Deficiencies in reporting results of lesbians and gays after donor intrauterine insemination and assisted reproductive technology treatments: a review of the first emerging studies. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 13:52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson LK, Fleming SD, Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN, Zieschang JA, Clark AM. 2009. Cryopreservation-induced human sperm DNA damage is predominantly mediated by oxidative stress rather than apoptosis. Hum Reprod. 24:2061–2070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagnini L, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Massaro FC, Pontes A, Oliveira JBA, Franco JG. 2007. The effects of male age on sperm DNA damage in an infertile population. Reprod Biomed Online. 15:514–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcarce DG, Cartón-García F, Riesco MF, Herráez MP, Robles V. 2013. Analysis of DNA damage after human sperm cryopreservation in genes crucial for fertilization and early embryo development. Andrology. 1:723–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeiden JP, Bernardus RE. 2013. Are imprinting disorders more prevalent after human in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection? Fertil Steril. 99:642–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennerholm UB, Henningsen AK, Romundstad LB, Bergh C, Pinborg A, Skjaerven R, Forman J, Gissler M, Nygren KG, Tiitinen A. 2013. Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod. 28:2545–2553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisborg K, Ingerslev HJ, Henriksen TB. 2010. IVF and stillbirth: a prospective follow-up study. Hum Reprod. 25:1312–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan J, Huang G, Sun Y, Zhao X, Chen S, Zou S, Hao C, Quan S, Chen Z-J. 2011. Birth defects after assisted reproductive technologies in China: analysis of 15,405 offspring in seven centers (2004 to 2008). Fertil Steril. 95:458–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan LY, Yan J, Qiao J, Zhao PL, Liu P. 2010. Effects of oocyte vitrification on histone modifications. Reprod Fertil Dev. 22:920–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarek SM, Hill MJ, Richter KS, Wu M, DeCherney AH, Osheroff JE, Levens ED. 2014. Single-donor and double-donor sperm intrauterine insemination cycles: does double intrauterine insemination increase clinical pregnancy rates? Fertil Steril. 102:739–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, De Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, Sullivan E, Vanderpoel S. 2009. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world health organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 92:1520–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Xu B, Zhang Q, Li YP. 2016. Which one has a better obstetric and perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancy, IVF/ICSI or FET? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 14:51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Lin S, Li M, Chen L, Lian Y, Liu P, Qiao J. 2014. Effect of in vitro culture period on birthweight of singleton newborns. Hum Reprod. 29:448–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. 2008. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 23:2663–2668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar