Comparative study on risk for birth defects among infants after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

References

• Aflatoonian A, Oskouian H, Ahmadi S, Oskouian L. 2010. Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial [Randomized Controlled TrialRetracted Publication]. J Assist Reprod Genet. 27(7):357–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amor DJ, Halliday J. 2008. A review of known imprinting syndromes and their association with assisted reproduction technologies [Review]. Hum Reprod. 23(12):2826–2834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnhart KT. 2014. Introduction: are we ready to eliminate the transfer of fresh embryos in in vitro fertilization? [Introductory]. Fertil Steril. 102(1):1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belva F, Henriet S, Van Den Abbeel E, Camus M, Devroey P, Van der Elst J, Liebaers I, Haentjens P, Bonduelle M. 2008. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles [Comparative StudyResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Hum Reprod. 23(10):2227–2238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonduelle M, Van Assche E, Joris H, Keymolen K, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. 2002. Prenatal testing in ICSI pregnancies: incidence of chromosomal anomalies in 1586 karyotypes and relation to sperm parameters [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Hum Reprod. 17(10):2600–2614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulet SL, Kirby RS, Reefhuis J, Zhang Y, Sunderam S, Cohen B, Bernson D, Copeland G, Bailey MA, Jamieson DJ, et al. 2016. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects Among Liveborn Infants in Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan, 2000-2010. JAMA Pediatr. 170(6):e154934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. 2015. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection [Comparative StudyResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramural]. JAMA. 313(3):255–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen H, Wang Y, Lyu Q, Ai A, Fu Y, Tian H, Cai R, Hong Q, Chen Q, Shoham Z, et al. 2015. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 103(5):1194–1201.e2.
   Google Scholar
• Cobo A, de Los Santos MJ, Castello D, Gamiz P, Campos P, Remohi J. 2012. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles [Video-Audio Media]. Fertil Steril. 98(5):1138–1146, e1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Priest K, Scott H, Haan EA, Chan A. 2012. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. N Engl J Med. 366(19):1803–1813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng C, Yi L, Mu Y, Zhu J, Qin Y, Fan X, Wang Y, Li Q, Dai L. 2015. Recent trends in the birth prevalence of Down syndrome in China: impact of prenatal diagnosis and subsequent terminations [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Prenat Diagn. 35(4):311–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson A, Kallen B. 2001. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study [Meta-Analysis]. Hum Reprod. 16(3):504–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerris AC, Loft A, Pinborg A, Christiansen M, Tabor A. 2008. Prenatal testing among women pregnant after assisted reproductive techniques in Denmark 1995-2000: a national cohort study [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Hum Reprod. 23(7):1545–1552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackshaw A, Rodeck C, Boniface S. 2011. Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: a systematic review based on 173 687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls [Meta-AnalysisReview]. Hum Reprod Update. 17(5):589–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, de Klerk N, Bower C. 2013. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Meta-AnalysisResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review]. Hum Reprod Update. 19(4):330–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisey AS, Bell EM, Herdt-Losavio ML, Druschel C. 2015. Surveillance of congenital malformations in infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology or other fertility treatments [Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 103(2):119–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herrero L, Martinez M, Garcia-Velasco JA. 2011. Current status of human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation [Review]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 23(4):245–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD. 2014. Monitoring health outcomes of assisted reproductive technology [Letter]. N Engl J Med. 371(1):91–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie RT, Lyngstadaas A, Orstavik KH, Bakketeig LS, Jacobsen G, Tanbo T. 2005. Birth defects in children conceived by ICSI compared with children conceived by other IVF-methods; a meta-analysis [Meta-AnalysisResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov’tReview]. Int J Epidemiol. 34(3):696–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, Bhattacharya S. 2012. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Comparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview]. Fertil Steril. 98(2):368–377, e361–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelkonen S, Hartikainen AL, Ritvanen A, Koivunen R, Martikainen H, Gissler M, Tiitinen A. 2014. Major congenital anomalies in children born after frozen embryo transfer: a cohort study 1995-2006 [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Hum Reprod. 29(7):1552–1557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Henningsen AK, Malchau SS, Loft A. 2013. Congenital anomalies after assisted reproductive technology [Review]. Fertil Steril. 99(2):327–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Loft A, Henningsen AK, Ziebe S. 2012. Does assisted reproductive treatment increase the risk of birth defects in the offspring? [Editorial]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 91(11):1245–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocheleau CM, Bertke SJ, Lawson CC, Romitti PA, Sanderson WT, Malik S, Lupo PJ, Desrosiers TA, Bell E, Druschel C, et al. 2015. Maternal occupational pesticide exposure and risk of congenital heart defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study [Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 103(10):823–833.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, Checa MA. 2013. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Comparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview]. Fertil Steril. 99(1):156–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samadirad B, Khamnian Z, Hosseini MB, Dastgiri S. 2012. Congenital anomalies and termination of pregnancy in Iran [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. J Pregnancy. 2012:574513.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svensson E, Ehrenstein V, Norgaard M, Bakketeig LS, Rothman KJ, Sorensen HT, Pedersen L. 2014. Estimating the proportion of all observed birth defects occurring in pregnancies terminated by a second-trimester abortion [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. Epidemiology. 25(6):866–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, Dai J, Liu Y, Xia Y, Liu J, Hu Z. 2012. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis [Meta-AnalysisResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov’tReview]. Fertil Steril. 97(6):1331–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu JL, Basso O, Obel C, Bille C, Olsen J. 2006. Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: danish national birth cohort [Research Support, N.I.H., IntramuralResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. BMJ. 333(7570):679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar