Morphometric analysis of sperm used for IVP by three different separation methods with spatial light interference microscopy

References

• Arias ME, Andara K, Briones E, Felmer R. 2017. Bovine sperm separation by Swim-up and density gradients (Percoll and BoviPure): effect on sperm quality, function and gene expression. Reprod Biol. 17(2):126–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balberg M, Levi M, Kalinowski K, Barnea I, Mirsky SK, Shaked NT. 2017. Localized measurements of physical parameters within human sperm cells obtained with wide-field interferometry. J Biophotonics. 10:1305–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banaszewska D, Andraszek K, Czubaszek M, Biesiada-Drzazga B. 2015. The effect of selected staining techniques on bull sperm morphometry. Anim Reprod Sci. 159:17–24. eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeghini EC, de Arruda RP, de Andrade AF, Nascimento J, Raphael CF, Rodrigues PH. 2008. Effects that bovine sperm cryopreservation using two different extenders has on sperm membranes and chromatin. Anim Reprod Sci. 104(2–4):119–131. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan PJ, Jacobson JD, Corselli JU, Patton WC. 2006. A simple zeta method for sperm selection based on membrane charge. Fertil Steril. 85(2):481–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq U, Malecki IA, Mahmood M, Martin GB. 2017. Appraisal and standardization of curvilinear velocity (VCL) cut-off values for CASA analysis of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) sperm. Reprod Domest Anim. 52(3):389–396. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Herreros M, Leal CLV. 2014. Comparative study of sperm washing and selection methods after cryopreservation and its influence on sperm subpopulational structure in a bovine model. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 60(6):338–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkel RR, Schill WB. 2003. Sperm preparation for ART. Reprod Biolgy Endocrinol. 1(108):1–22. eng.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishijima SA, Okuno M, Mohri H. 1991. Zeta potential of human X- and Y-bearing sperm. Int J Androl. 14(5):340–347. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel ME, Fanous M, Best-Popescu C, Popescu G. 2018. Real-time halo correction in phase contrast imaging. Biomedical Optics Express. 9(2):623–635. eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel ME, Teng KW, Selvin PR, Popescu G. 2017. Label-free imaging of single microtubule dynamics using spatial light interference microscopy. ACS Nano. 11(1):647–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondracki S, Wysokinska A, Kania M, Gorski K. 2017. Application of two staining methods for sperm morphometric evaluation in domestic pigs. J Vet Res. 61(3):345–349. eng
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Choi JH, Ryu S, Jung D, Song J, Lee JS, Joo C. 2018. Color-coded LED microscopy for quantitative phase imaging: implementation and application to sperm motility analysis. Methods. 136:66–74. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Kandel ME, Rubessa M, Schreiber S, Wheeler MB, Popescu G. 2018. Topography and refractometry of sperm cells using spatial light interference microscopy. J Biomed Opt. 23(2):025003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maree L, du Plessis SS, Menkveld R, van der Horst G. 2010. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod. 25(6):1369–1382. eng.
   Google Scholar
• Milewska AJ, Jankowska D, Citko D, Więsak T, Acacio B, Milewski R. 2014. The use of principal component analysis and logistic regression in prediction of infertility treatment outcome. Stud Logic. 39(52):17.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy Á, Polichronopoulos T, Gáspárdy A, Solti L, Cseh S. 2015. Correlation between bull fertility and sperm cell velocity parameters generated by computer-assisted semen analysis. Acta Vet Hung. 63(3):370–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TH, Kandel ME, Rubessa M, Wheeler MB, Popescu G. 2017. Gradient light interference microscopy for 3D imaging of unlabeled specimens. Nat Commun. 8(1):210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nongbua T, Al-Essawe EM, Edman A, Johannisson A, Morrell JM. 2018. Adding bovine seminal plasma prior to freezing improves post-thaw bull sperm kinematics but decreases mitochondrial activity. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 64(3):183–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira LZ, Hossepian de Lima VF, Levenhagen MA, Santos RM, Assumpcao TI, Jacomini JO, Andrade AF, Arruda RP, Beletti ME. 2011. Transmission electron microscopy for characterization of acrosomal damage after Percoll gradient centrifugation of cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. J Vet Sci. 12(3):267–272. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park Y, Depeursinge C, Popescu G. 2018. Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine. Nat Photonics. 12(10):578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish J. 1991. Application of in vitro fertilization to domestic animals. In: Wasserman PM, editor. Biology and chemistry of mammalian fertilization vol ll. New York: CRC Press; p. 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish JJ. 2014. Bovine in vitro fertilization: in vitro oocyte maturation and sperm capacitation with heparin. Theriogenology. 81(1):67–73. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrish JJ, Krogenaes A, Susko-Parrish JL. 1995. Effect of bovine sperm separation by either swim-up or Percoll method on success of in vitro fertilization and early embryonic development. Theriogenology. 44(6):859–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu G. 2011. Quantitative phase imaging of cells and tissues. New York: McGraw-Hill. (McGraw-Hill Biophotonics).
   Google Scholar
• Rubessa M, Gaja A, Wheeler MB. 2016. Development of an electronic micro-fluidic method to separate viable bovine sperm from extended semen for use in in vitro fertilization in cattle. Andrology Open-Access. 5(1):7.
   Google Scholar
• Rubessa M, Lotti SN, Kandel ME, Popescu G, Wheeler MB. 2019. SLIM microscopy allows for visualization of DNA-containing liposomes designed for sperm-mediated gene transfer in cattle. Mol Biol Rep. 46(1):695–703. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattar A, Rubessa M, Di Francesco S, Longobardi V, Di Palo R, Zicarelli L, Campanile G, Gasparrini B. 2011. The influence of gamete co-incubation length on the in vitro fertility and sex ratio of bovine bulls with different penetration speed. Reprod Domest Anim. 46(6):1090–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somfai T, Bodo S, Nagy S, Papp AB, Ivancsics J, Baranyai B, Gocza E, Kovacs A. 2002. Effect of swim up and Percoll treatment on viability and acrosome integrity of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim. 37(5):285–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterzik K, De Santo M, Uhlich S, Gagsteiger F, Strehler E. 1998. Glass wool filtration leads to a higher percentage of spermatozoa with intact acrosomes: an ultrastructural analysis. Hum Reprod. 13(9):2506–2511. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcárcel A, de Las Heras MA, Moses DF, Perez LJ, Baldassarre H. 1996. Comparison between Sephadex G-10 and Percoll for preparation of normospermic, asthenospermic and frozen/thawed ram semen. Anim Reprod Sci. 41(3):215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warger WC, Laevsky GS, Townsend DJ, Rajadhyaksha M, DiMarzio CA. 2007. Multimodal optical microscope for detecting viability of mouse embryos in vitro. J Biomed Opt. 12(4):044006.1–044006.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Y, Clark EN, Florman HM. 1995. Sperm membrane potential: hyperpolarization during capacitation regulates zona pellucida-dependent acrosomal secretion. Dev Biol. 171(2):554–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar