Flaws (and quality) in research today: can artificial intelligence intervene?

References

• Braithwaite J, Herkes J, Churruca K, Long JC, Pomare C, Boyling C, Bierbaum M, Clay-Williams R, Rapport F, Shih P, et al. 2019. Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models. BMJ Open. 9(3):e025320. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavda J, Patel A. 2016. Measuring research impact: bibliometrics, social media, altmetrics, and the BJGP. Brit J Gen Prac. 66(642):e59–61. doi:10.3399/bjgp16X683353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell EKWE, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, Hoomans T, Meltzer DO, Noorani H, Robinson KA, Motu’apuaka M, et al. 2015. Defining the benefits and challenges of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Compa Eff Res. 2015(5):13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cyranoski D, Gilbert N, Ledford H, Nayar A, Yahia M. 2011. Education: the PhD factory. Nature. 472(7343):276–279. doi:10.1038/472276a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G. 2011. Can Tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 13(4):e123. doi:10.2196/jmir.2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman S, Greenland S. 2007. Why most published research findings are false: problems in the analysis. PLoS Med. 4(4):e168.eng. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamet P, Tremblay J. 2017. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Metabolism. 69S:S36–S40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haykin SS. 1999. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River (N.J.): Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JPTTJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, editors. 2019. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2(8):e124.eng. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP. 2014. How to make more published research true. PLoS Med. 11(10):e1001747. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP, Boyack KW, Klavans R. 2014. Estimates of the continuously publishing core in the scientific workforce. PLoS One. 9(7):e101698. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak N, Choi CH. 2002. Input feature selection for classification problems. IEEE Trans Neural Net Pub IEEE Neural Net Cou. 13(1):143–159. doi:10.1109/72.977291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen PO, von Ins M. 2010. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics. 84(3):575–603. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leatherdale ST. 2019. Natural experiment methodology for research: a review of how different methods can support real-world research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 22(1):19–35. doi:10.1080/13645579.2018.1488449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt JM, Thelwall M. 2011. A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact. Inf Process Manag. 47(2):300–308. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2010.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggio LA, Meyer HS, Artino AR Jr. 2017. Beyond citation rates: a real-time impact analysis of health professions education research using altmetrics. Acad Med. 92(10):1449–1455. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElreath R, Smaldino PE. 2015. Replication, communication, and the population dynamics of scientific discovery. PLoS One. 10(8):e0136088. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe D. 2018. Chips for artificial intelligence. Commun ACM. 61(4):15–17. doi:10.1145/3185523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotou OA, Willer CJ, Hirschhorn JN, Ioannidis JP. 2013. The power of meta-analysis in genome-wide association studies. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 14:441–465. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi GI, Kemker R, Part JL, Kanan C, Wermter S. 2019. Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review. Neural Net. 113:54–71. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setiono R, Liu H. 1997. Neural-network feature selector. IEEE Trans Neural Net Pub IEEE Neural Net Cou. 8(3):654–662. doi:10.1109/72.572104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siristatidis CS, Chrelias C, Pouliakis A, Katsimanis E, Kassanos D. 2010. Artificial neural networks in gynaecological diseases: current and potential future applications. Med Sci Mon. 16(10):RA231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smaldino PE, McElreath R. 2016. The natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci. 3(9):160384. doi:10.1098/rsos.160384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng HY, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, et al. 2019. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 366:l4898. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Diest PJ, Holzel H, Burnett D, Crocker J. 2001. Impactitis: new cures for an old disease. J Clin Pathol. 54(11):817–819. doi:10.1136/jcp.54.11.817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogiatzi P, Pouliakis A, Siristatidis C. 2019. An artificial neural network for the prediction of assisted reproduction outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 36(7):1441–1448. doi:10.1007/s10815-019-01498-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YX. 2016. Systemic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic imaging technologies. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 6(5):615–618. doi:10.21037/qims.2016.10.08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng G, Chen Y, Cui B, Yu S. 2019. Continual learning of context-dependent processing in neural networks. Nature Mac Intel. 1(8):364–372. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0080-x.
   Google Scholar