Sperm content of TXNDC8 reflects sperm chromatin structure, pregnancy establishment, and incidence of multiple births after ART

References

• Ahlering P, Sutovsky P. 2015. Biomarker-based flow-cytometric semen analysis for male infertility diagnostics and clinical decision making in ART.. In: Sills ES, editor. Screening for the single euploid embryo - molecular genetics in reproductive medicine. New York, NY: Springer Science+Media LLC; p. 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovsky A, Yagoda A, Lederman H, Artzi S, Gross M, Barak Y. 2003. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril. 80(6):1413–1419. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.05.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckman C, George TC, Friend S, Sutovsky M, Miranda-Vizuete A, Ozanon C, Morrissey P, Sutovsky P. 2009. High throughput, parallel imaging and biomarker quantification of human spermatozoa by ImageStream flow cytometry. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 55(5–6):244–251. doi:10.3109/19396360903056224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckman C, Ozanon C, Qiu J, Sutovsky M, Carafa JA, Rawe VY, Manandhar G, Miranda-Vizuete A, Sutovsky P. 2013. Semen levels of spermatid-specific thioredoxin-3 correlate with pregnancy rates in ART couples. PLoS One. 8(5):e61000. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson D, Jost L. 2000. Sperm chromatin structure assay is useful for fertility assessment. Methods Cell Sci. 22(2–3):169–189. doi:10.1023/A:1009844109023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evenson DP. 2016. The Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA((R))) and other sperm DNA fragmentation tests for evaluation of sperm nuclear DNA integrity as related to fertility. Anim Reprod Sci. 169:56–75. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.01.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zinaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, de Angelis P, Claussen OP. 1999. Utility of the sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 14(4):1039–1049. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.4.1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feugang JM, Liao SF, Crenshaw MA, Clemente H, Willard ST, Ryan PL. 2015. Lectin-functionalized magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for reproductive improvement. JFIV Reprod Med Genet. 3(2):145.
   Google Scholar
• Giwercman A, Lindstedt L, Larsson M, Bungum M, Spano M, Levine RJ, Rylander L. 2010. Sperm chromatin structure assay as an independent predictor of fertility in vivo: a case-control study. Int J Androl. 33(1):e221–e227. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.00995.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giwercman A, Richthoff J, Hjollund H, Bonde JP, Jepson K, Frohm B, Spano M. 2003. Correlation between sperm motility and sperm chromatin structure assay parameters. Fertil Steril. 80(6):1404–1412. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02212-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez A, Johansson C, Ljung J, Sagemark J, Berndt KD, Ren B, Tibbelin G, Ladenstein R, Kieselbach T, Holmgren A, et al. 2002. Human spermatid-specific thioredoxin-1 (Sptrx-1) is a two-domain protein with oxidizing activity. FEBS Lett. 530(1–3):79–84. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(02)03417-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez A, Zu W, Rawe VY, Pelto-Huikko M, Flickinger CJ, Sutovsky P, Gustafsson JA, Oko R, Miranda-Vizuete A. 2004. Spermatocyte/spermatid-specific thioredoxin-3, a novel Golgi apparatus-associated thioredoxin, is a specific marker of aberrant spermatogenesis. J Biol Chem. 279(33):34971–34982. doi:10.1074/jbc.M404192200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy C, Ahlering P, Rodriguez H, Levy S, Sutovsky P. 2011. Sperm chromatin structure correlates with spontaneous abortion and multiple pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 22(3):272–276. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy CE, Krieger KB, Sutovsky M, Xu W, Vargovic P, Didion BA, Ellersieck MR, Hennessy ME, Verstegen J, Oko R, et al. 2014. Protein expression pattern of PAWP in bull spermatozoa is associated with sperm quality and fertility following artificial insemination. Mol Reprod Dev. 81(5):436–449. doi:10.1002/mrd.22309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda-Vizuete A, Sadek CM, Jimenez A, Krause WJ, Sutovsky P, Oko R. 2004. The mammalian testis-specific thioredoxin system. Antioxid Redox Signal. 6(1):25–40. doi:10.1089/152308604771978327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odhiambo JF, DeJarnette JM, Geary TW, Kennedy CE, Suarez SS, Sutovsky M, Sutovsky P. 2014. Increased conception rates in beef cattle inseminated with nanopurified bull semen. Biol Reprod. 91(4):97. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.114.121897.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenthal MS. 2010. The Suleman octuplet case: an analysis of multiple ethical issues. Womens Health Issues. 20(4):260–265. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2010.04.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadek CM, Jimenez A, Damdimopoulos AE, Kieselbach T, Nord M, Gustafsson JA, Spyrou G, Davis EC, Oko R, van der Hoorn FA, et al. 2003. Characterization of human thioredoxin-like 2. A novel microtubule-binding thioredoxin expressed predominantly in the cilia of lung airway epithelium and spermatid manchette and axoneme. J Biol Chem. 278(15):13133–13142. doi:10.1074/jbc.M300369200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said TM, Land JA. 2011. Effects of advanced selection methods on sperm quality and ART outcome: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 17(6):719–733. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon L, Zini A, Dyachenko A, Ciampi A, Carrell DT. 2016. A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of sperm DNA damage on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Asian J Androl. 19(1):80–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TB, Baker MA, Connaughton HS, Habenicht U, Aitken RJ. 2013. Functional deletion of Txndc2 and Txndc3 increases the susceptibility of spermatozoa to age-related oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 65:872–881. eng. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.05.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutovsky P, Aarabi M, Miranda-Vizuete A, Oko R. 2015. Negative biomarker based male fertility evaluation: sperm phenotypes associated with molecular-level anomalies. Asian J Androl. 17(4):554–560. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.153847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavalaee M, Kiani-Esfahani A, Nasr-Esfahani MH. 2017a. Relationship between potential sperm factors involved in oocyte activation and sperm DNA fragmentation with intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection clinical outcomes. Cell J. 18(4):588–596. doi:10.22074/cellj.2016.4725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavalaee M, Parivar K, Shahverdi AH, Ghaedi K, Nasr-Esfahani MH. 2017b. Status of sperm-born oocyte activating factors (PAWP, PLCzeta) and sperm chromatin in uncapacitated, capacitated and acrosome-reacted conditions. Hum Fertil (Camb). 20(2):96–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Li G, Jin H, Guo Y, Sun Y. 2019. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation index on assisted reproductive technology outcomes and its relationship with semen parameters and lifestyle. Transl Androl Urol. 8(4):356–365. doi:10.21037/tau.2019.06.22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar