Search in:

Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine Volume 66, 2020 - Issue 6

Submit an article Journal homepage

Free access

2,626

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

CLINICAL: RESEARCH COMMUNICATION

Comparing endometrial receptivity array to histologic dating of the endometrium in women with a history of implantation failure

Arianne M. Cohena Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information

Xiang Y. Yec Maternal Infant Care Research Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, CanadaView further author information

Terence J. Colgand Life Labs, Etobicoke, ON, CanadaView further author information

Ellen M. Greenblatta Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;e Mount Sinai Fertility, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, CanadaView further author information

Crystal Chana Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;e Mount Sinai Fertility, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada;f Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, CanadaView further author information

Pages 347-354 | Received 18 Apr 2020, Accepted 06 Sep 2020, Published online: 30 Sep 2020

Cite this article
https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2020.1824032
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF View EPUB EPUB

References

Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, Hsieh T, Barzilay E, Orvieto R, Haas J. 2018. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 35(7):1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1190-9.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Bergh PA, Navot D. 1992. The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation. Fertil Steril. 58(3):537–542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55259-5.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osborne NG, Castillo JC, Bonilla F Jr. 2013. Endometrial receptivity: evaluation with ultrasound. Ultrasound Q. 29(1):3–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318281b60a.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, Cutting R, Ong K, Sallam H, Li TC. 2014. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 28(1):14–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Díaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martínez-Conejero JA, Esteban FJ, Alamá P, Pellicer A, Simón C. 2011. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril. 95(1):50–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.063.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Díaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Bosch N, Martínez-Conejero JA, Alamá P, Garrido N, Pellicer A, Simón C. 2013. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 99(2):508–517.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hashimoto T, Koizumi M, Doshida M, Toya M, Sagara E, Oka N, Nakajo Y, Aono N, Igarashi H, Kyono K. 2017. Efficacy of the endometrial receptivity array for repeated implantation failure in Japan: A retrospective, two‐centers study. Repro Med Biol. 16(3):290–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12041.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Järvelä IY, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, Ojha K, Campbell S, Nargund G. 2005. Evaluation of endometrial receptivity during in‐vitro fertilization using three‐dimensional power Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 26(7):765–769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2628.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kalma Y, Granot I, Gnainsky Y, Or Y, Czernobilsky B, Dekel N, Barash A. 2009. Endometrial biopsy-induced gene modulation: first evidence for the expression of bladder-transmembranal uroplakin Ib in human endometrium. Fertil Steril. 91(4):1042–1049. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.043.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Murray MJ, Meyer WR, Lessey BA, Zaino RJ, Novotny DB, Fritz MA. 2002. Endometrial dating revisited: a randomized systematic study of secretory phase histologic characteristics in normally cycling fertile women. Fertil Steril. 78:S67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03555-0.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Neves AR, Devesa M, Martínez F, Garcia-Martinez S, Rodriguez I, Polyzos NP, Coroleu B. 2019. What is the clinical impact of the endometrial receptivity array in PGT-A and oocyte donation cycles? J Assist Reprod Genet. 36(9):1901–1908. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01535-5.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Noyes RW, Hertig AI, Rock J. 1950. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1:3–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)30062-0.
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Revel A. 2012. Defective endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 97(5):1028–1032. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.039.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Díaz-Gimeno P, Gómez E, Fernández-Sánchez M, Carranza F, Carrera J, Vilella F, Pellicer A, Simón C. 2013. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 100(3):818–824. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.004.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Ruiz-Alonso M, Galindo N, Pellicer A, Simon C. 2014. What a difference two days make: “personalized” embryo transfer (pET) paradigm: a case report and pilot study. Hum Reprod. 29(6):1244–1247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu070.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Simon A, Laufer N. 2012. Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation failure (RIF). J Assist Reprod Genet. 29(11):1227–1239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9861-4.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Smith S, Hosid S, Scott L. 1995. Endometrial biopsy dating. Interobserver variation and its impact on clinical practice. J Reprod Med. 40(1):1–3.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Stern C, Chamley L, Norris H, Hale L, Baker HW. 2003. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of heparin and aspirin for women with in vitro fertilization implantation failure and antiphospholipid or antinuclear antibodies. Fertil Steril. 80(2):376–383. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00610-1.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Tan J, Kan A, Hitkari J, Taylor B, Tallon N, Warraich G, Yuzpe A, Nakhuda G. 2018. The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 35(4):683–692. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1112-2.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. 1999. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 340(23):1796–1799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199906103402304.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Comparing endometrial receptivity array to histologic dating of the endometrium in women with a history of implantation failure

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Comparing endometrial receptivity array to histologic dating of the endometrium in women with a history of implantation failure

References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date