A fertility-oriented method for histological processing of testicular biopsies in men with azoospermia

References

• Agarwal A, Baskaran S, Parekh N, Cho CL, Henkel R, Vij S, … Shah R. 2020. Male infertility. Lancet. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32667-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral D, Chiarini-Garcia H, Vale Filho VR, Allen WR. 2004. Effect of formalin and bouin fixation upon the mare’s endometrial biopsies embedded in plastic resin. Arquivo Brasileiro De Medicina Veterinária E Zootecnia. 56:07–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett HS, Wyrick AD, Lee SW, McNeil JH. 1976. Science and art in preparing tissues embedded in plastic for light microscopy, with special reference to glycol methacrylate, glass knives and simple stains. Stain Technol. 51(2):71–97. doi:10.3109/10520297609116677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann M, Behre HM, Nieschlag E. 1994. Serum FSH and testicular morphology in male infertility. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 40(1):133–136. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb02455.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarini-Garcia H, Lima MY, Reis AB, Martello R, Nihi F, Gomes ML, Almeida FR. 2017. Influence of three different histological methods on the morphology and morphometrical data in human testis. Histol Histopathol. 32(1):27–34. doi:10.14670/HH-11-765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarini-Garcia H, Meistrich ML. 2008. High-resolution light microscopic characterization of spermatogonia. Methods Mol Biol. 450:95–107. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-214-8_6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiarini-Garcia H, Parreira GG, Almeida FR. 2011. Glycol methacrylate embedding for improved morphological, morphometrical, and immunohistochemical investigations under light microscopy: testes as a model. Methods Mol Biol. 689:3–18. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-950-5_1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiarini-Garcia H, Raymer AM, Russell LD. 2003. Non-random distribution of spermatogonia in rats: evidence of niches in the seminiferous tubules. Reproduction. 126(5):669–680. doi:10.1530/rep.0.1260669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarini-Garcia H, Russell LD. 2001. High-resolution light microscopic characterization of mouse spermatogonia. Biol Reprod. 65(4):1170–1178. doi:10.1095/biolreprod65.4.1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cito G, Coccia ME, Dabizzi S, Morselli S, Della Camera PA, Cocci A, … Natali A. 2018. Relevance of testicular histopathology on prediction of sperm retrieval rates in case of non-obstructive and obstructive azoospermia. Urologia. 85(2):60–67. doi:10.1177/0391560318758940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole MB Jr., Sykes SM. 1974. Glycol methacrylate in light microscopy: a routine method for embedding and sectioning animal tissues. Stain Technol. 49(6):387–400. doi:10.3109/10520297409117016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corona G, Minhas S, Giwercman A, Bettocchi C, Dinkelman-Smit M, Dohle G, … Sofikitis N. 2019. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 25(6):733–757. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmz028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dajani YF. 1998. Testicular biopsy: an update. Curr Diagn Pathol. 5(1):17–22. doi:10.1016/S0968-6053(98)80030-6.
   Google Scholar
• Ehmcke J, Schlatt S. 2006. A revised model for spermatogonial expansion in man: lessons from non-human primates. Reproduction. 132(5):673–680. doi:10.1530/rep.1.01081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eken A, Gulec F. 2018. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE): predictive value of preoperative hormonal levels and pathology in non-obstructive azoospermia. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 34(2):103–108. doi:10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliveld J, Van Wely M, Meer A, Repping S, Van Der Veen F, Van Pelt AMM. 2018. The risk of TESE-induced hypogonadism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 24(4):442–454. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmy015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellenburg JL, Kolettis P, Drwiega JC, Posey AM, Goldberg M, Mehrad M, … Gordetsky J. 2020. Formalin versus bouin solution for testis biopsies: which is the better fixative? Clin Pathol. 13:2632010X19897262. doi:10.1177/2632010X19897262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox CH, Johnson FB, Whiting J, Roller PP. 1985. Formaldehyde fixation. J Histochem Cytochem. 33(8):845–853. doi:10.1177/33.8.3894502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnessi L, Scarselli F, Minasi MG, Mariani S, Lubrano C, Basciani S, … Greco E. 2018. Testicular histopathology, semen analysis and FSH, predictive value of sperm retrieval: supportive counseling in case of reoperation after testicular sperm extraction (TESE). BMC Urol. 18(1):63. doi:10.1186/s12894-018-0379-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gul M, Hildorf S, Dong L, Thorup J, Hoffmann ER, Jensen CFS, … Goossens E. 2020. Review of injection techniques for spermatogonial stem cell transplantation. Hum Reprod Update. 26(3):368–391. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmaa003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howroyd P, Hoyle-Thacker R, Lyght O, Williams D, Kleymenova E. 2005. Morphology of the fetal rat testis preserved in different fixatives. Toxicol Pathol. 33(2):300–304. doi:10.1080/01926230590896145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janosek-Albright KJC, Schlegel PN, Dabaja AA. 2015. Testis sperm extraction. Asian J Urol. 2(2):79–84. doi:10.1016/j.ajur.2015.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latendresse JR, Warbrittion AR, Jonassen H, Creasy DM. 2002. Fixation of testes and eyes using a modified davidson’s fluid: comparison with bouin’s fluid and conventional davidson’s fluid. Toxicol Pathol. 30(4):524–533. doi:10.1080/01926230290105721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS. 1979. Testicular biopsy in the study of male infertility: its current usefulness, histologic techniques, and prospects for the future. Hum Pathol. 10(5):569–584. doi:10.1016/s0046-8177(79)80100-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan RI, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Hoei-Hansen CE, De Kretser DM, Skakkebaek NE. 2007. Histological evaluation of the human testis–approaches to optimizing the clinical value of the assessment: mini review. Hum Reprod. 22(1):2–16. doi:10.1093/humrep/del279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive, M. 2015. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 103(3):e18–25. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhse G, Hense J, Bergmann M, Kliesch S. 2011. Bilateral histological evaluation of exocrine testicular function in men with obstructive azoospermia: condition of spermatogenesis and andrological implications? Hum Reprod. 26(10):2606–2612. doi:10.1093/humrep/der257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T, Katagiri K, Gohbara A, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Ogura A, … Ogawa T. 2011. In vitro production of functional sperm in cultured neonatal mouse testes. Nature. 471(7339):504–507. doi:10.1038/nature09850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoysman R, Vanderzwalmen P, Nijs M, Segal L, Segal-Bertin G, Geerts L, … Schoysman D. 1993. Pregnancy after fertilisation with human testicular spermatozoa. Lancet. 342(8881):1237. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92217-h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Wistuba J, Pock T, Schlatt S, Neuhaus N. 2019. Spermatogonial stem cells: updates from specification to clinical relevance. Hum Reprod Update. 25(3):275–297. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmz006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Bishen KA, Garg D, Sukhija H, Sharma D, Tomar U. 2019. Fixation and fixatives: roles and functions—a short review. Dental J Adv Stud. 7(2):51–55. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1693098.
   Google Scholar
• Toksoz S, Kizilkan Y. 2019. Comparison of the histopathological findings of testis tissues of non-obstructive azoospermia with the findings after microscopic testicular sperm extraction. Urol J. 16(2):212–215. doi:10.22037/uj.v16i2.4756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff JM, Greenfield SA. 1979. Advantages of glycol methacrylate embedding systems for light microscopy. J Histotechnol. 2(4):164–167. doi:10.1179/his.1979.2.4.164.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao X, Hu R, Deng FM, Shen SS, Yang XJ, Wu CL. 2017. Practical applications of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of genitourinary tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 141(9):1181–1194. doi:10.5858/arpa.2016-0530-RA.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzmann M, Nordhoff V, Von Schonfeld V, Nordsiek-Mengede A, Kliesch S, Schuring AN, … Nieschlag E. 2006. Elevated follicle-stimulating hormone levels and the chances for azoospermic men to become fathers after retrieval of elongated spermatids from cryopreserved testicular tissue. Fertil Steril. 86(2):339–347. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar