Effects of first and second division modes on euploidy acquisition in human embryo

References

• Aguilar J, Rubio I, Muñoz E, Pellicer A, Meseguer M. 2016. Study of nucleation status in the second cell cycle of human embryo and its impact on implantation rate. Fertil Steril. 106(2):291–299.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzarello A, Hoest T, Mikkelsen AL. 2012. The impact of pronuclei morphology and dynamicity on live birth outcome after time-lapse culture. Hum Reprod. 27(9):2649–2657. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz M, Gadea B, Garrido N, Pedersen KS, Martínez M, Pérez-Cano I, Muñoz M, Meseguer M. 2011. Embryo quality, blastocyst and ongoing pregnancy rates in oocyte donation patients whose embryos were monitored by time-lapse imaging. J Assist Reprod Genet. 28(7):569–573. doi: 10.1007/s10815-011-9549-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. 2000. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 73(6):1155–1158. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00518-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgetti C, Hans E, Terriou P, Salzmann J, Barry B, Chabert-Orsini V, Chinchole J, Franquebalme J, Glowaczower E, Sitri MC, et al. 2007. Early cleavage: an additional predictor of high implantation rate following elective single embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 14(1):85–91. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60768-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman LR, Goldberg J, Falcone T, Austin C, Desai N. 2016. Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 105(2):275–285.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardarson T, Hanson C, Sjögren A, Lundin K. 2001. Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum Reprod. 16(2):313–318. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.2.313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto S, Nakano T, Yamagata K, Inoue M, Morimoto Y, Nakaoka Y. 2016. Multinucleation per se is not always sufficient as a marker of abnormality to decide against transferring human embryos. Fertil Steril. 106(1):133–139.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard K, Agerholm IE, Ingerslev HJ. 2012. Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Hum Reprod. 27(5):1277–1285. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard K, Sundvall L, Erlandsen M, Hindkjær JJ, Knudsen UB, Ingerslev HJ. 2016. Timing of human preimplantation embryonic development is confounded by embryo origin. Hum Reprod. 31(2):324–331. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Chapple V, Roberts P, Matson P. 2014. Prevalence, consequence, and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the embryoscope time-lapse video system. Fertil Steril. 102(5):1295–1300.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lledo B, Morales R, Ortiz JA, Rodriguez-Arnedo A, Ten J, Castillo JC, Bernabeu A, Llacer J, Bernabeu R. 2021. Consistent results of non-invasive PGT-A of human embryos using two different techniques for chromosomal analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 42(3):555–563. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.10.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, Fukumoto Y, Tokudome M, Moewaki H, Watanabe M, Tabira T, Iwakawa T, Takeuchi K. 2021. The effect of repeated cryopreservation and thawing using cryotip on the clinical outcomes of embryos. Reprod Med Biol. 20(2):176–181. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, Fukumoto Y, Tokudome M, Moewaki H, Watanabe M, Iwakawa T, Takeuchi K. 2022a. A novel trophectoderm biopsy technique for all blastocyst stages. Reprod Med Biol. 21(1):e12418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, Fukumoto Y, Tokudome M, Moewaki H, Watanabe M, Iwakawa T, Takeuchi K. 2022b. The effects of differences in trophectoderm biopsy techniques and the number of cells collected for biopsy on next-generation sequencing results. Reprod Med Biol. 21(1):e12463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizobe Y, Oya N, Iwakiri R, Yoshida N, Sato Y, Miyoshi K, Tokunaga M, Ezono Y. 2016. Effects of early cleavage patterns of human embryos on subsequent in vitro development and implantation. Fertil Steril. 106(2):348–353.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizobe Y, Tokunaga M, Oya N, Iwakiri R, Yoshida N, Sato Y, Onoue N, Ezono Y. 2018. Synchrony of the first division as an index of the blastocyst formation rate during embryonic development. Reprod Med Biol. 17(1):64–70. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Alikani M, Ribustello L, Colls P, Martínez-Ortiz PA, McCulloh DH, Referring Physician Group. 2017. Euploidy rates in donor egg cycles significantly differ between fertility centers. Hum Reprod. 32(4):743–749. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prados FJ, Debrock S, Lemmen JG, Agerholm I. 2012. The cleavage stage embryo. Hum Reprod. 27(suppl 1):i50–i71. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio C, Navarro-Sánchez L, García-Pascual CM, Ocali O, Cimadomo D, Venier W, Barroso G, Kopcow L, Bahçeci M, Kulmann MIR, et al. 2020. Multicenter prospective study of concordance between embryonic cell-free DNA and trophectoderm biopsies from 1301 human blastocysts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 223(5):751.e1–751.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio I, Galán A, Larreategui Z, Ayerdi F, Bellver J, Herrero J, Meseguer M. 2014. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertil Steril. 102(5):1287–1294.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio I, Kuhlmann R, Agerholm I, Kirk J, Herrero J, Escribá MJ, Bellver J, Meseguer M. 2012. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril. 98(6):1458–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdev NM, Ribustello L, Liu E, McCulloh DH, Grifo J, Munne S. 2016. The rate of mosaic embryos from donor egg as detected by next generation sequencing (NGS) varies by IVF laboratory. Fertil Steril. 106(3):e156–e157. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimura S, Akai T, Hashiyada Y, Somfai T, Inaba Y, Hirayama M, Yamanouchi T, Matsuda H, Kobayashi S, Aikawa Y, et al. 2012. Promising system for selecting healthy in vitro-fertilized embryos in cattle. PLoS One. 7(5):e36627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi K. 2021. Pre-implantation genetic testing: past, present, future. Reprod Med Biol. 20(1):27–40. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Royen E, Mangelschots K, Vercruyssen M, De Neubourg D, Valkenburg M, Ryckaert G, Gerris J. 2003. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 18(5):1062–1069. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viotti M, Victor AR, Barnes FL, Zouves CG, Besser AG, Grifo JA, Cheng EH, Lee MS, Horcajadas JA, Corti L, et al. 2021. Using outcome data from one thousand mosaic embryo transfers to formulate an embryo ranking system for clinical use. Fertil Steril. 115(5):1212–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung QSY, Zhang YX, Chung JPW, Lui WT, Kwok YKY, Gui B, Kong GWS, Cao Y, Li TC, Choy KW. 2019. A prospective study of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (NiPGT-A) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) on spent culture media (SCM). J Assist Reprod Genet. 36(8):1609–1621. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01517-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan Q, Sierra ET, Malmsten J, Ye Z, Rosenwaks Z, Zaninovic N. 2020. Blastocyst score, a blastocyst quality ranking tool, is a predictor of blastocyst ploidy and implantation potential. F S Rep. 1(2):133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.05.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar