A hybrid approach using AHP–TOPSIS–entropy methods for sustainable ranking of structural materials

References

• Al-Harbi , K.M. 2001 . Application of the AHP in project management . International Journal of Project Management , 19 : 19 – 27 .
   Google Scholar
• Anink , D. , Boonstra , C. and Mak , J. 1996 . Handbook of sustainable building: an environmental preference method for selection of materials for use in construction and refurbishment , London : James & James .
   Google Scholar
• Bakhoum, E.S., 2011. A decision support system for evaluation and selection of structural materials on a sustainability basis, Thesis (PhD). University of Southampton
   Google Scholar
• Bakhoum , E.S. and Brown , D.C. 2012 . Developed sustainable scoring system for structural materials evaluation . Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , 138 ( 1 ) : 110 – 119 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRE, 2011. BRE environmental and sustainability standard [Online]. Available from: www.breeam.org/filelibrary/BREEAM%20In%20Use/BES_5058_Issue_1_2_BREEAM_In_Use.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D.C., 2003. A methodology for selecting the construction team, Thesis (PhD). University of Southampton
   Google Scholar
• Çakmakli, A.B., 2007. Life cycle assessment of building materials in hotel refurbishment projects: a case study in Ankara, Thesis (PhD). Middle East Technical University
   Google Scholar
• Chen , M.F. and Tzeng , G.H. 2004 . Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country . Mathematical and Computer Modeling , 40 ( 13 ) : 1473 – 1490 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIOB, 2003. Sustainability and construction [Online]. Available from: http://www.ciob.org.uk/resources/publications
   Google Scholar
• Corus, 2006. Sustainable steel construction: the design and construction of sustainable buildings [Online]. Available from: www.corusconstruction.com
   Google Scholar
• Curran , M.A. 2006 . Life cycle assessment: principles and practice , Cincinnati : Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC), National Risk Management Research Laboratory .
   Google Scholar
• Ding , G.K. 2008 . Sustainable construction: the role of environmental assessment tools . Journal of Environmental Management , 86 : 451 – 464 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DTI (Department of Trade and Industry) . 2006 . Sustainable construction strategy , London : Crown .
   Google Scholar
• EMSD . 2006 . Consultancy study on life cycle energy analysis of building construction , Hong Kong : Ove Arup & Partners .
   Google Scholar
• Francis , A.J. 1989 . Introducing structures, civil and structural engineering, building and architecture , Chichester : Ellis Horwood Limited .
   Google Scholar
• Haapio , A. and Viitaniemi , P. 2008 . A critical review of building environmental assessment tools . Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 28 : 469 – 482 . ELSEVIER
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison , J. 2005 . “ The role of materials in sustainable construction ” . In Materials and testing: science, technology, application , Fremantle : TecEco .
   Google Scholar
• Hwang , C.L. and Yoon , K. 1981 . Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications , New York : Springer-Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• ICE . 2002 . Society, sustainability and civil engineering , London : Institution of Civil Engineers .
   Google Scholar
• Jee , D.H. and Kang , K.J. 2000 . A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory . Materials and Design , 21 : 199 – 206 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khasreen , M.M. , Banfill , P.F. and Menzies , G.F. 2009 . Life-cycle assessment and the environmental impact of buildings: a review . Sustainability , 1 : 674 – 701 .
   Google Scholar
• Lippiatt , B.C. 2007 . Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES 4): technical manual and user guide , Gaithersburg, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory .
   Google Scholar
• Ljungberg , L.Y. 2007 . Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products . Materials and Design , 28 : 466 – 479 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdi , I.M. and Alreshaid , K. 2005 . Decision support system for selecting the proper project delivery method using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) . International Journal of Project Management , 23 : 564 – 572 .
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoodzadeh , S. , Shahrabi , J. , Pariazar , M. and Zaeri , M.S. 2007 . Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique . International Journal of Human and Social Sciences , 2 ( 7 ) : 397 – 402 .
   Google Scholar
• Mora , E.P. 2007 . Life cycle, sustainability and the transcendent quality of building materials . Building and Environment , 42 : 1329 – 1334 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa, I.M., 2001. A decision support system for the selection of the optimum contractor, Thesis (PhD). University of Southampton
   Google Scholar
• Nebel , B. 2006 . White paper – life cycle assessment and the building and construction industry , Auckland : Beacon Pathway .
   Google Scholar
• Obla , K.H. 2009 . What is green concrete? . The Indian Concrete Journal , 24 : 26 – 28 .
   Google Scholar
• Omann, I., 2004. Multi-criteria decision aid as an approach for sustainable development analysis and implementation, Thesis (PhD). University of Graz
   Google Scholar
• Patrick , T.I. 2007 . Constructability rankings of construction systems based on the analytical hierarchy process . Journal of Architectural Engineering , 13 : 36 – 43 .
   Google Scholar
• Plessis , C. 2007 . A strategic framework for sustainable construction in developing countries . Construction Management and Economics , 25 : 67 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, N., 2007. Environmental life-cycle assessment of highway construction projects, Thesis (MSc). Texas A&M University
   Google Scholar
• Rameezdeen , R. and Manewa , R.M. 2006 . An integration of value management and enironement sustainability to select construction materials . The Value Manager , 12 ( 1 ) : 8 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Saaty , T.L. 1980 . The analytical heirarchial process , New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Seo , S. 2004 . Fuzzy decision-making tool for environmental sustainable buildings . Journal of Construction Engineering and Management , 130 ( 3 ) : 415 – 423 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon , C.E. 1948 . A mathematical theory of communication . The Bell System Technical Journal , 27 : 379 – 423 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh , V.P. 2000 . The entropy theory as a tool for modeling and decision-making in environmental and water resources . Water SA , 26 ( 1 ) : 1 – 12 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghavifard , M.T. and Mirheydari , D. 2008 . “ A new framework for evaluation and prioritization of suppliers using a hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS ” . In Proceedings of world academy of science, engineering and technology Vol. 31 , ISSN 1307-6884
   Google Scholar
• Trusty , W.B. and Horst , S.W. 2002 . “ Integrating LCA tools in green building rating systems ” . In The Austin Papers: Best of the 2002 International Green Building Conference , Brattleboro, VT : Building Green, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Vanegas , J.A. , DuBose , J.R. and Pearce , A.R. 1995 . “ Sustainable technologies for the building construction industry ” . In The symposium on design for the global environment Atlanta
   Google Scholar
• Yagi , K. and Halada , K. 2001 . Materials development for a sustainable society . Materials and Design , 22 : 143 – 146 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang , J. , Brandon , P.S. and Sidwell , A.C. 2005 . Smart and sustainable built environments , Oxford : Blackwell .
   Google Scholar
• Yoon , K.P. and Hwang , C.L. 1995 . Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction , California : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Young, S.B., Turnbull, S., and Russell, A., 2002. Toward a Sustainable Cement Industry: what LCA can tell us about the cement industry, [Online]. Available from: http://www.wbcsd.ch/DocRoot/7O4kJWOZYM0R8ukvOiXw/sub_lca.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zanakis , S.H. 1998 . Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods . European Journal of Operational Research , 107 : 507 – 529 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar