LCCA and environmental LCA for highway pavement selection in Colorado

References

• AASHTO. 2010. “GreenDOT.” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Accessed September 15, 2011. http://144.171.11.40/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID = 2621.
   Google Scholar
• ApulD.2011. “BenReMod: A Web-Based Model for Comparing the Environmental Impacts from Road Construction Materials.” Presentation at Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference. Accessed August 30. University of Toledo. Accessed August 30. https://www.dot.state.oh.us/engineering/OTEC/2007%20Presentations/Wednesday%20Sessions/Session%2054%20-%2010-30%20am%20C226/54B-Apul/OTEC2007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE. 2013. “Report Card for America's Infrastructure.” Accessed June 28. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/.
   Google Scholar
• CarrR.2000. “Construction Congestion Cost (CO3) Basic Model.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management126 (2): 105–113. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:2(105).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CassD., and A.Mukherjee. 2011. “Calculation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Highway Construction Operations by Using a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment Approach: Case Study for Pavement Operations.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management137 (11): 1015–1025. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDOT (Colorado Department of Transportation). 2014. “Pavement Design Manual.” Accessed Spetember 20. http://www.coloradodot.info/business/designsupport/materials-and-geotechnical/manuals/2015-pavement-design-manual/view.
   Google Scholar
• ChanA. W.-C.2007. “Economic and Environmental Evaluations of Life Cycle Cost Analysis Practice: A Case Study of Michigan DOT Pavement Projects.” Master of Science thesis in Natural Resource and Environment, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• ChanA., G.Keoleian, and E.Gabler. 2008. “Evaluation of Life-cycle Cost Analysis Practices Used by the Michigan Department of Transportation.” Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE134 (6): 236–245. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:6(236).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CMDGI (Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute). 2013. “Economic Input–Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA), US 2002 Industry Benchmark Model [Internet].” http://www.eiolca.net.
   Google Scholar
• DavisS. C., and S. W.Diegel. 2002. Transportation Energy Data Book. Oak Ridge, TN: Center for Transportation Analysis, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2014. Inventoy of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990–2012. Environmental Protection Agency. Accessed Spetember 21. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2014-Main-Text.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EppsJ. A., R. B.Leahy, T.Mitchell, C.Ashmore, S.Seeds, S.Alavi, and C. L.Monishmith. 1999. The Road to Performance-Related Specifications. Reno, NV: WesTrack Interim Rep.
   Google Scholar
• ERES Consultants. 2003. Neutral Third Party Ohio Pavement Selection Process Analysis. Champaign, IL: ERES Consultants. Report Prepared for Ohio DOT Pavement Selection Advisory Council.
   Google Scholar
• Eurobitume. 2011. Life Cycle Inventory: Bitumen, Brussels, Belgium. Accessed November 10, 2012. http://www.eurobitume.eu/hse/sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA. 1998. Life-cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design. HNG-42/9-98(5M)QE. Washington, DC: FHWA.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA. 2002. Life-cycle Cost Analysis Primer. FHWA-IF-02-047. Washington, DC: FHWA.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA. 2003. Economic Analysis Primer. FHWA IF-03-032. Washington, DC: FHWA.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA. 2008. Highway Statistics 2008. Accessed January 3, 2012. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2008/.
   Google Scholar
• GerkeR., R.Dewald, and R.Gerbrandt. 1998. “Use of Highway Network Level Data for a Project Level Life Cycle Analysis.” In Proceedings of the 1998 Transportation Conference, 135–138. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• HäkkinenT., and K.Mäkelä. 1996. Environmental Impact of Concrete and Asphalt Pavements, in Environmental Adaption of Concrete. Technical Research Center of Finland. Research Notes 1752.
   Google Scholar
• HorvathA.2004. “PaLATE: Pavement Life-cycle Assessment Tool for Environmental and Economic Effects.” University of California, Berkeley. Accessed October 1, 2011. http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~horvath/palate.html.
   Google Scholar
• HorvathA., and C.Hendrickson. 1998. “Comparison of Environmental Implications of Asphalt and Steel-Reinforced Concrete Pavements.” Transportation Research Record1626, pp. 105–113. doi:10.3141/1626-13.
   Google Scholar
• IRF. 2011. “CHANGER: IRF Greenhouse Calculator.” International Road Federation. Accessed September 15, 2011. http://www.irfnet.org/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• LiuR., S.Durham, K.Rens, and A.Ramaswami. 2012. “Optimization of Cementitious Material Content for Sustainable Concrete Mixtures.” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering24 (6): 745–753. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MTU. 2011. PE-2: Project Emission Estimator. Houghton, MI: Michigan Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• NisbetM. A., M. L.Marceau, M. G.VanGeem, and J.Gajda. 2001. Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete and Asphalt Concrete Pavements. Portland Cement Association. PCA R&D Serial No. 2489. http://www.nrmca.org/taskforce/item_2_talkingpoints/sustainability/sustainability/sn2137a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OzbayK., D.Jawad, N. A.Parker, and S.Hussain. 2004. Life Cycle Cost Analysis: State-of-the-Practice vs. State-of-the-Art. Rutgers University and the City College of the City University. New York: New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• PatersonW. D. O., and B.Attoh-Okine. 1992. Simplified Models of Paved Road Deterioration Based on HDM-III. Transportation Research Record 1344. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• ReinerM. B.2007. “Technology, Environment, Resource and Policy Assessment of Sustainable Concrete in Urban Infrastructure.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center.
   Google Scholar
• SanteroN., A.Loijos, M.Akbarian, and J.Ochsendorf. 2011. Method, Impacts, and Opportunities in the Concrete Pavement Life Cycle. Concrete Sustainability Hub, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Accessed August 21, 2011. http://web.mit.edu/cshub/news/pdf/MIT%20Pavement%20LCA%20Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SanteroN., E.Masanet, and A.Horvath. 2010. Life Cycle Assessment of Pavements: A Critical Review of Existing Literature and Research, SN3119a. Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association. Accessed December 12, 2011. www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/985846-cyLjIR/985846.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TRB (Transportation Research Board). 1985. Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavements. Synthesis of Highway Practice No. 122. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• TRL. 2011. asPECT: asphalt Pavement Embodied Carbon Tool. Transportation Research Laboratory. Accessed August 30. http://www.sustainabilityofhighways.org.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• UddinW.1993. “Application of User Cost and Benefit Analysis in Maintenance Management and Transportation Planning.” Compendium, 4R-7th International Pavement Management/ Maintenance Exposition and Conference, Philadelphia, December 5–7, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army. 1986. Economic Studies for Military Construction Design-Applications. TM 5-802-1Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2004. Vision Model: Description of Model Used to Estimate the Impact of Highway Vehicle Technologies and Fuels on Energy Use and Carbon Emissions to 2050. Argonne, IL: Center for Transportation Research Argonne National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• USDOT. 2008. Transportation Statistics Annual Report. Washington, DC: United States Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• WatanatadaThawat, Clell G.Harral, William D. O.Paterson, Ashok M.Dhareshwar, AnilBhandari, and KojiTsunkawa. 1987. The Highway Design and Maintenance Standards Model. Vols. 1 and 2. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WildeW., S.Waalkes, and R.Harrison. 2001. Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Portland Cement Concrete Pavements, SWUTC/01/167205-1. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2005. CO2 Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Cement Industry. Accessed November 15, 2011. www.wbcsd.org/web/publications/cement-tf1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ZaniewskiJ. P., B. C.Butler, G.Cunningham, G. E.Elkins, M. S.Paggi, and R.Machemehl. 1982. Vehicle Operating Costs, Field Consumption and Pavement Type and Condition Factors. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• ZapataP., and J. A.Gambatese. 2005. “Energy Consumption of Asphalt and Reinforced Concrete Pavement Materials and Construction.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems11 (1): 9–20. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:1(9).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangH., M. D.Lepech, G. A.Keoleian, S.Qian, and V. C.Li. 2010. “Dynamic Life-Cycle Modeling of Pavement Overlay Systems: Capturing the Impacts of Users, Construction, and Roadway Deterioration.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems16 (4): 299–309. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar