Metamodelling-based Product Family Design of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles

References

• Abe, S. 2010. “Development of Toyota Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle.” Journal of Asian Electric Vehicles 8 (2): 1399–1404.10.4130/jaev.8.1399
   Google Scholar
• Alış, Ö. F., and H. Rabitz. 2001. “Efficient Implementation of High Dimensional Model Representations.” Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 29 (2): 127–142.10.1023/A:1010979129659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amjad, S., S. Neelakrishnan, and R. Rudramoorthy. 2010. “Review of Design Considerations and Technological Challenges for Successful Development and Deployment of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (3): 1104–1110.10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axsen, J., and K. S. Kurani. 2010. “Anticipating Plug-in Hybrid Vehicle Energy Impacts in California: Constructing Consumer-informed Recharge Profiles.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 15 (4): 212–219.10.1016/j.trd.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, T. H., and A. A. Frank. 2009. “Design, Demonstrations and Sustainability Impact Assessments for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (1): 115–128.10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. H., A. Younis, K. Haji Hajikolaei, and G. Gary Wang. 2015. “Trust Region Based Mode Pursuing Sampling Method for Global Optimization of High Dimensional Design Problems.” Journal of Mechanical Desesign 137 (2), 021407: 1–9.10.1017/jmech.2015.92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Z., and M. J. Scott. 2006. “Effective Product Family Design Using Preference Aggregation.” Journal of Mechanical Design 128 (4): 659–667.10.1115/1.2197835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Z., and M. J. Scott. 2007. “Product Platform Design through Sensitivity Analysis and Cluster Analysis.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18 (1): 97–113.10.1007/s10845-007-0011-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbue, O., and S. Long. 2012. “Barriers to Widespread Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Analysis of Consumer Attitudes and Perceptions.” Energy Policy 48: 717–729.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellini, R., M. Kokkolaras, N. Michelena, P. Papalambros, A. Perez-Duarte, K. Saitou, and P. Fenyes. 2004. “A Sensitivity-based Commonality Strategy for Family Products of Mild Variation, with Application to Automotive Body Structures.” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 27 (1–2): 89–96.10.1007/s00158-003-0356-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellini, R., M. Kokkolaras, P. Papalambros, and A. Perez-Duarte. 2005. “Platform Selection Under Performance Bounds in Optimal Design of Product Families.” Journal of Mechanical Design 127 (4): 524–535.10.1115/1.1899176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellini, R., P. Papalambros, and T. Weber. 2000. “Application of a Product Platform Design Process to Automotive Powertrains.” Paper presented at the 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA. doi:10.2514/6.2000-4849.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R. 2001. Comparing the Benefits and Impacts of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Options ( Report 1000349). Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).
   Google Scholar
• Hajikolaei, K. H., Z. Pirmoradi, G. H. Wang, and G. G. Wang. 2015. “Decomposition for Large-scale Global Optimization Based on Quantified Variable Correlations Uncovered by Metamodelling.” Engineering Optimization 47 (4): 429–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heywood, J. B. 1988. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, B., T. McGoldrick, D. Funston, H. Kwan, M. Alexander, F. Alioto, N. Culaud, O. Lang, H. Mergen, and R. Carlson. 1998. “The Continued Design and Development of the University of California, Davis FutureCar.” SAE SPEC PUBL, SAE, WARRENDALE, PA,(USA) 1359: 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kasarda, M. E., J. P. Terpenny, D. Inman, K. R. Precoda, J. Jelesko, A. Sahin, and J. Park. 2007. “Design for Adaptability (DFAD) – A New Concept for Achieving Sustainable Design.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 23 (6): 727–734.10.1016/j.rcim.2007.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khire, R., A. Messac, and T. W. Simpson. 2006. “Optimal Design of Product Families using Selection-integrated Optimization (SIO) Methodology”. Paper presented at the 11th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Portsmouth, VA, September 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kurani, K. S., R. R. Heffner, and T. Turrentine. 2008. Driving Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Reports from US Drivers of HEVs Converted to PHEVs. Circa. 2006–07. Institute of Transportation Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Li, G., J. Hu, S. W. Wang, P. G. Georgopoulos, J. Schoendorf, and H. Rabitz. 2006. “Random Sampling-high Dimensional Model Representation (RS-HDMR) and Orthogonality of its Different Order Component Functions.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 110 (7): 2474–2485.10.1021/jp054148m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and N. Kar. 2011. “Advanced Design Approach of Power Split Device of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles using Dynamic Programming”. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Chicago, September 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Li, G., S. W. Wang, and H. Rabitz. 2002. “Practical Approaches to Construct RS-HDMR Component Functions.” The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 106 (37): 8721–8733.10.1021/jp014567t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., and D. Greene. 2010. “Who will more likely buy PHEV: a detailed market segmentation analysis.” The 25th World Battery, hybrid and fuel cell electric vehicle symposium & exhibition, Shenzhen, china.
   Google Scholar
• MathWorks. 2013. MathWorks, MATLAB® and SIMULINK® Software. Version R2013b.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M., and K. Ishii. 1996. “Design for Variety: A Methodology for Understanding the Costs of Product Proliferation”. Paper presented at the Design Theory and Methodology – DETC1996/DTM-1610, Sacramento, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Messac, A., M. P. Martinez, and T. W. Simpson. 2002a. “Effective Product Family Design using Physical Programming.” Engineering Optimization 34 (3): 245–261.10.1080/03052150211746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messac, A., M. P. Martinez, and T. W. Simpson. 2002b. “Introduction of a Product Family Penalty Function Using Physical Programming.” Journal of Mechanical Design 124 (2): 164–172.10.1115/1.1467602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moawad, A., G. Singh, S. Hagspiel, M. Fellah, and A. Rousseau. 2009. “Impact of Real World Drive Cycles on PHEV Fuel Efficiency and Cost for Different Powertrain and Battery Characteristics.” Paper presented at the EVS24 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium 1 EVS24, Stavanger, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, R. U., W. Chen, and T. W. Simpson. 2002. “A Variation-based Method for Product Family Design.” Engineering Optimization 34 (1): 65–81.10.1080/03052150210910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemry, F., Leduc, G., and Munoz, A. 2009. Plug-in Hybrid and Battery-Electric Vehicles: State of the Research and Development and Comparative Analysis of Energy and Cost Efficiency. Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, JRC54699.
   Google Scholar
• Ninan, J. A. and Z. Siddique. 2014. “Cascading Platforms for Product Family Design. Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design.” In Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design, edited by Timothy W. Simpson, Jianxin Jiao, Zahed Siddique, and Katja Hölttä-Otto, 367–390. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-7937-6
   Google Scholar
• Pirmoradi, Z., K. H. Hajikolaei, and G. G. Wang. 2014. “Designing Scalable Product Families for Black-box Function.” Paper presented at the IDETC/CIE 014, Buffalo, NY, USA, August 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pirmoradi, Z., K. H. Hajikolaei, and G. G. Wang. 2015. “Designing Scalable Product Families by the Radial Basis Function – High-dimensional Model Representation Metamodelling Technique.” Engineering Optimization 47 (10): 1423–1439.10.1080/0305215X.2014.971776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, A., Pagerit, S., and G. Monnet. 2001. “The New PNGV System Analysis Toolkit PSAT V4.1 – Evolution and Improvements.” SAE paper 01-2536, Future Transportation Technology Conference, Costa Mesa, CA, August.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, A., N. Shidore, R. Carlson, and V. Freyermuth. 2007. “Research on PHEV Battery Requirements and Evaluation of Early Prototypes.” Paper presented at the Advanced Automotive Battery Conference, A. V. Session. Long Beach, CA, May 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Santini, D., and A. Vyas. 2008. How to Use Life Cycle Analysis Comparisons of PHEVs to Competing Powertrains. Chicago, IL: Argonne National Lab., Univ. of Chicago, US Dept. of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Shan, S., and G. G. Wang. 2010. “Metamodeling for High Dimensional Simulation-based Design Problems.” Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (5) 051009: 1–11.10.1115/1.4001597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharer, P., A. Rousseau, P. Nelson, and S. Pagerit. 2006. Vehicle Simulation Results for Plug-in HEV Battery Requirements. Lemont, IL, USA: Argonne National Laboratory, EVS22.
   Google Scholar
• Shiau, C.-S. N., and J. J. Michalek. 2009. “Optimal Product Design under Price Competition.” Journal of Mechanical Design 131 (7): 071003–071010.10.1115/1.3125886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiau, C. S. N., C. Samaras, R. Hauffe, and J. J. Michalek. 2009. “Impact of Battery Weight and Charging Patterns on the Economic and Environmental Benefits of Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles.” Energy Policy 37 (7): 2653–2663.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. 2006. Cost-benefit Analysis of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, T. W., W. Chen, J. K. Allen, and F. Mistree. 1996. “Conceptual Design of a Family of Products Through the Use of the Robust Concept Exploration Method.” Paper presented at the 6th. AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, pp. 1535–1545.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, T. W., J. R. Maier, and F. Mistree. 2001. “Product Platform Design: Method and Application.” Research in Engineering Design 13 (1): 2–22.10.1007/s001630100002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerlos, S. J., and J. J. Winebrake. 2010. “Targeting Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Policies to Increase Social Benefits.” Energy Policy 38 (2): 705–708.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol, I. M. 1993. “Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models.” Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment 1 (4): 407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Thevenot, H. J., and T. W. Simpson. 2006. “Commonality Indices for Product Family Design: A Detailed Comparison.” Journal of Engineering Design 17 (2): 99–119.10.1080/09544820500275693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turlapati, V. V. K. 2010. “Modeling and Optimization of A Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle.” MSc diss., Clemson University.
   Google Scholar