Technological Development and Its Effect on IT Operations Cost and Environmental Impact

References

• Angelini, C. 2014. Intel Core i7-5960X, −5930K and −5820K CPU Review. Haswell-E Rises.
   Google Scholar
• Axelos 2018. “What Is ITIL Best Practice?”
   Google Scholar
• Belady, C. 2018. “Green Grid Data Center Power Efficiency Metrics: PUE and DCIE.” Technical Report 6, green grid.
   Google Scholar
• Byte Magazine (1975–1998). “Byte Magazine.” https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine
   Google Scholar
• Capros, P. De Vita, A, Tasios, N, Siskos, P, Kannavou, M, Petropoulos, A, Evangelopoulou, S, Zampara, M, Papadopoulos, D, Nakos, C, et al. 2016. “Trends to 2050.”
   Google Scholar
• Cavin, R. K., P. Lugli, and V. V. Shirnov 2012. “Science and Engineering beyond Moore’s Law.” In Proceedings of the IEEE 100 (Special Centennial Issue), 1720–1749.
   Google Scholar
• CCSDS.Org. 2016. “Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems.”
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. 2013. “Is PUE Still Useful?”
   Google Scholar
• Digital Realty Research Trust. 2012. “Data Center Survey.”
   Google Scholar
• Fortrust. 2015. “PUE: Is It a Meaningful Measurement of Data Center Efficiency?”
   Google Scholar
• Gartner. 2009. “Data Center Cost Portfolio.”
   Google Scholar
• Gotter, F. 2017. “Analysing and Exploiting Technology Driven Cost Factors in Long Term IT Operations in Complex, Mission Critical Operations Centres.” PhD thesis., Mendel University, Brno.
   Google Scholar
• Gotter, F., and J. Pfau 2014. “Retaining the Operational Status of a Space Mission during the Loss of the Main Control System Using Virtualization.” In Spaceops Conference 2014. AIAA American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Pasadena.
   Google Scholar
• Graniszewski, W., and A. Arciszewski. 2016. “Performance Analysis of Selected Hypervisors (Virtual Machine Monitors – VMMs.” International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications 62 (3): 231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gründwald, R., M. Ragwitz, F. Sensfuss, and J. Winkler 2012. “Regenerative Energieträger zur Sicherung der Grundlast in der Stromversorgung.” Technical Report 147, Office for the estimation of technologies at the German Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. 2011. “Cloud Computing Is Driving Infrastructure Innovation.” Presented at Stanford Computer Forum, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hintemann, R. 2014. “Consolidation, Colocation, Virtualization, and Cloud Computing: The Impact of the Changing Structure of Data Centers on Total Electricity Demand.” In ICT Innovations for Sustainability, edited by L. M. Hilty and B. Aebischer, 125–136. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hintemann, R., and J. Clausen 2014. “Rechenzentren in Deutschland: Eine Studie zur Darstellung der wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung und der Wettbewerbssituation.” Technical report, Borderstep Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hintemann, R., and K. Fichter 2010. “Materialbestand der Rechenzentren in Deutschland.” Technical report, Borderstep Institute.
   Google Scholar
• HP. 2016. “HP Power Supplies.”
   Google Scholar
• Intel. 2009. “The Problem of Power Consumption in Servers.”
   Google Scholar
• Kontorinis, V. Sampson, J, Zhang, LE, Aksanli, B, Homayoun, H, Rosing, TS, Tullsen, DM. et al. 2012. “Battery Provisioning and Associated Costs for Data Center Power Capping.” Technical Report CS2012-0985, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, UC San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Koomey, J. 2006. “A Simple Model for Determining True Total Cost of Ownership for Data Centers.” Technical report, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Koomey, J. 2007. “A Simple Model for Determining True Total Cost of Ownership for Data Centers.” Technical report, Uptime Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Koomey, J. G., S. Berard, M. Sanchez, and H. Wong. 2009. “Assessing Trends in the Electrical Efficiency of Computation over Time.” IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koomey, J. G., S. Berard, M. Sanchez, and H. Wong. 2011. “Implications of Historical Trends in the Electrical Efficiency of Computing.” Annals of the History of Computing 33 (3): 46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, R. 1982. “Uncertainty Principle and Minimal Energy Dissipation in the Computer.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics 21 (3/4): 283–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenovo. 2016. “Providing Energy Efficient Solutions.”
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, J. C. 2002. “Price-Performance of Computer Technology.” In The Computer Engineering Handbook, edited by G. Oklobdzija, 4: 1–18. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, J. C. 2015. “John C. McCallum.” http://www.jcmit.net
   Google Scholar
• Mell, W.-D. 2003. “Jenseits von TCO: TCL-Kennzahlen (Total Cost of Lifecycle) als Planungs- und Argumentationshilfen.”
   Google Scholar
• Miau, J. J., and R. Holdaway, editors. 2000. Reducing the Cost of Spacecraft Ground Systems and Operations. Dordrecht; London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. E. 1965. “Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits.” Electronics 38 (8): 114–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newegg Inc. 2012. “Newegg – Online Retailer of Computer Hardware.” http://www.newegg.com
   Google Scholar
• Pauli, D. 2008. “Think ITIL Will Reduce Cost? You’re Wrong.” Computer-world Australia.
   Google Scholar
• PC Magazine. 2016. “PC Magazine.” http://www.pcmag.com
   Google Scholar
• Persse, J. 2012. The ITIL Process Manual. Zaltbommel: Van Haren Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pultz, J. E. 2011. “10 Key Actions to Reduce IT Infrastructure and Operations Cost Structure.”
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, K. 2014. “CPU, GPU and MIC Hardware Characteristics over Time.”
   Google Scholar
• Sandau, R. 2006. International Study on Cost-Effective Earth Observation Missions. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäppi, B., Przywara, B, Bellosa, F, Bogner, T, Weeren, S, Harrison, R, Anglade, A.  2009. “Energy Efficient Servers in Europe.”
   Google Scholar
• Schembri, T., and O. Boisseau 2015. “On-line Museum since 1985.”
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P., and A. Roos 2009. “New Enterprise Hard Drives 6 GB/s SAS and 200 MB/s.”
   Google Scholar
• Spear, T. 1998. “NASA FBC Task Final Report.”
   Google Scholar
• Stengel, S. 2018. http://oldcomputers.net/
   Google Scholar
• Turner, W. P., and J. H. Seader 2006. “Dollars per kW Plus Dollars per Square Foot are a Better Datacenter Cost Model than Dollars per Square Foot Alone.” Technical report, University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2018. “Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data Explorer, Selection of Energy.” https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases
   Google Scholar
• Uptime Institute. 2018. “Data Center Site Infrastructure Tier Standard: Topology.”
   Google Scholar
• Villarrubia, C. 2013. “Portugal Telecom Opens Model Data Center in Portugal.”
   Google Scholar
• Ward, D. 2010. “Faster, Better, Cheaper Revisited. Program Management Lessons from NASA.” Defense AT&L, March-April:48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, J. R., and W. Larson. 1996. Reducing Space Mission Cost. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, J. R., and W. Larson, editors. 1999. Space Mission Analysis and Design. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2016. “Data Centers – What are the Costs of Ownership?”
   Google Scholar
• Wright, L. A., S. Kemp, and I. M. Williams. 2011. “Carbon Footprinting: Towards a Universally Accepted Definition.” Carbon Management 2 (1): 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar