Quality assurance for building-stock energy models: a performance comparison of eleven uncertainty and sensitivity analysis methods

References

• Becker, W. E., S. Tarantola, and G. Deman. 2018. “Sensitivity Analysis Approaches to High-dimensional Screening Problems at Low Sample Size.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 88 (11): 2089–2110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1450876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, A. T., R. Choudhary, and D. J. Spiegelhalter. 2012. “Handling Uncertainty in Housing Stock Models.” Building and Environment 48: 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgonovo, E. 2007. “A New Uncertainty Importance Measure.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 92 (6): 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracke, W., M. Delghust, J. Laverge, and A. Janssens. 2018. “Building Energy Performance: Sphere Area as a Fair Nomalisation Concept.” Building Research & Information 47 (5): 1466–4321. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2018.1467703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolongo, F., J. Cariboni, and A. Saltelli. 2007. “An Effective Screening Design for Sensitivity Analysis of Large Models.” Environmental Modelling & Software 22 (10): 1509–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerezo Davila, C. 2017. “Building Archetype Calibration for Effective Urban Building Energy Modelling.” PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Concerted Action EPBD. 2008. Implementing the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). Featuring country reports 2005–2007.
   Google Scholar
• Concerted Action EPBD. 2011. Implementing the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). Featuring country reports 2007–2010.
   Google Scholar
• Concerted Action EPBD. 2016. Implementing the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). Featuring country reports 2011–2015.
   Google Scholar
• Concerted Action EPBD. 2019. Implementing the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). Featuring country reports 2015–2018.
   Google Scholar
• Concerted Action EPBD. 2023. Implementing the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). Featuring country reports 2018–2022. (to be published).
   Google Scholar
• Cozza, S., J. Chambers, and M. K. Patel. 2020. “Measuring the Thermal Energy Performance Gap of Labelled Residential Buildings in Switzerland.” Energy Policy 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukier, R. I., C. M. Fortuin, K. E. Shuler, A. G. Petschek, and J. H. Schaibly. 1973. “Study of the Sensitivity of Coupled Reaction Systems to Uncertainties in Rate Coefficients. I Theory.” The Journal of Chemical Physics 59 (8): 3873–3878. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1680571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukier, R. I., J. H. Schaibly, and K. E. Shuler. 1975. “Study of the Sensitivity of Coupled Reaction Systems to Uncertainties in Rate Coefficients. III. Analysis of the Approximations.” The Journal of Chemical Physics 63 (3): 1140–1149. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.431440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dascalaki, E. G., K. G. Droutsa, C. A. Balaras, and S. Kontoyiannidis. 2011. “Building Typologies as a Tool for Assessing the Energy Performance of Residential Buildings – A Case Study for the Hellenic Building Stock.” Energy and Buildings 43 (12): 3400–3409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delghust, M. 2015a. “Improving the Predictive Power of Simplified Residential Space Heating Demand Models: A Field Data and Model Driven Study.” PhD diss., Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Delghust, M., Y. De Weerdt, and A. Janssens. 2015b. “Zoning and Intermittency Simplifications in Quasi-steady State Models.” Proceedings of the 6th International Building Physics Conference (IBPC2015), Torino, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Delghust, M., T. Strobbe, R. De Meyer, and A. Janssens. 2015c. “Enrichment of Single-Zone EPB-Data into Multi-zone Models Using BIM-based Parametric Typologies.” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of IBPSA (BS2015), Hyderabad, India.
   Google Scholar
• DIN. 2007. DIN V 18599-2:2007-02 Energy Efficiency of Buildings — Calculation of the Energy Needs, Delivered Energy and Primary Energy for Heating, Cooling, Ventilation, Domestic Hot Water and Lighting. Deutschen Instituts für Normung.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Munoz, F., J. M. Cejudo-Lopez, and A. Carrillo-Andrés. 2010. “Uncertainty in Peak Cooling Load Calculations.” Energy and Buildings 42 (7): 1010–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2020. JRC Technical Report: Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for Policy Decision Making. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhower, B., Z. O’Neill, V. A. Fonoberov, and I. Mezic. 2012. “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Decomposition of Building Energy Models.” Journal of Building Performance Simulation 5 (3): 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2010.549964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. 2020. Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. Brussels: European Commission Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, P. J., S. Ebrahimigharehbaghi, E. Mata, G. Kokogiannakis, S. Amrith, and S. Ignatiadou. 2023. “A Review of the Status of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Building-Stock Energy Models.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (in review).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennell, P. J., P. A. Ruyssevelt, E. Mata, and M. Jacob. 2019. “A Review of the Status of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Building-stock Energy Models.” Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of IBPSA (BS2019), Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, P. J., M. Van Hove, L. Weinberg, G. J. Bennett, M. Delghust, S. Forthuber, M. Jakob, et al. 2021. “Challenges and Lessons Learned in Applying Sensitivity Analysis to Building Stock Energy Models.” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of IBPSA (BS2021), Bruges, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Fracastoro, G. V., and M. Serraino. 2011. “A Methodology for Assessing the Energy Performance of Large Scale Building Stocks and Possible Applications.” Energy and Buildings 43 (4): 844–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, H. C., A. Mokhtari, and T. Danish. 2003. Evaluation of Selected Sensitivity Analysis Methods Based Upon Applications to Two Food Safety Process Risk Models. Raleigh: Releigh-North Carolina, North Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, D., B. Lacarrière, M. Musy, and B. Bourges. 2014. “Application of Sensitivity Analysis in Building Energy Simulations: Combining First- and Second-order Elementary Effects Methods.” Energy and Buildings 68: 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, Q., and M. Menendez. 2017. “Extending Morris Method for Qualitative Global Sensitivity Analysis of Models with Dependent Inputs.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 162: 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassie, D., I. Korolija, D. Mumovic, and P. A. Ruyssevelt. 2018. “Feedback and Feedforward Mechanisms for Generating Occupant Datasets for UK School Stock Simulation Modelling.” Proceedings of Building Simulation and Optimization 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra-Santin, O., L. Itard, and H. Visscher. 2009. “The Effect of Occupancy and Building Characteristics on Energy Use for Space and Water Heating in Dutch Residential Stock.” Energy and Buildings 41 (11): 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby, D. M. 1994. “A Review of Techniques for Parameter Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental Models.” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 32 (2): 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiselberg, P., H. Brohus, A. Hesselholt, H. Rasmussen, E. Seinre, and S. Thomas. 2009. “Application of Sensitivity Analysis in Design of Sustainable Buildings.” Renewable Energy 34 (9): 2030–2036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2009.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, J., and W. Usher. 2017. “SALib: An Open-Source Python Library for Sensitivity Analysis.” The Journal of Open Source Software 2 (9): 97. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00097.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfe, C. 2009. “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Building Performance Simulation for Decision Support and Design Optimisation.” PhD thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, N.-H., B. Reisfeld, F. Y. Bois, and W. A. Chiu. 2018. “Applying a Global Sensitivity Analysis Workflow to Improve the Computational Efficiencies in Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.” Frontiers in Pharmacology 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. 2019a. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2019: Towards a Zero-emissions, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IEA EBC Annex 70. 2017. Building Energy Epidemiology.
   Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). 2019b. Energy Efficiency: Buildings. The Global Exchange for Energy Efficiency Policies, Data and Analysis. https://www.iea.org/topics/energyefficiency/buildings/.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2007. ISO 13790:2007(E) Energy Performance of Buildings. Calculation of Energy Use for Space Heating and Cooling. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO).
   Google Scholar
• Kavgic, M., A. Mavrogianni, D. Mumovic, A. Summerfield, Z. Stevanovic, and M. Djurovic-Petrovic. 2010. “A Review of Bottom-up Building Stock Models for Energy Consumption in the Residential Sector.” Building and Environment 45 (7): 1683–1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. G. 1938. “A New Measure of Rank Correlation.” Biometrika 30 (1-2): 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/30.1-2.81.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. G., and B. B. Smith. 1939. “The problem of m rankings.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 10 (3): 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732186
   Google Scholar
• Kiparissides, A., S. S. Kucherenko, A. Mantalaris, and E. N. Pistikopoulos. 2009. “Global Sensitivity Analysis Challenges in Biological Systems Modeling.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 48 (15): 7168–7180. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie900139x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov, A. 1933. “Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione.” Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari 4: 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kucherenko, S., M. Rodriguez-Fernandez, C. Pantelides, and N. Shah. 2009. “Monte Carlo Evaluation of Derivative-based Global Sensitivity Measures.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 94 (7): 1135–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langevin, J., J. L. Reyna, S. Ebrahimigharebhaghi, N. Holck Sandberg, P. Fennell, C. Nägeli, J. Laverge, M. Delghust, M. Van Hove, J. Webster, et al. 2020. “Developing a Common Approach for Classifying Building Stock Energy Models.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 133: 110276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, H., and Z. J. Zhai. 2017. “Review on Stochastic Modeling Methods for Building Stock Energy Prediction.” Building Simulation 10 (5): 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-017-0383-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucks, D. P., and E. van Beek. 2017. Water Resource Systems Planning and Management: An Introduction to Methods, Models, and Applications. Spinger, Deltares and UNESCO-IHE. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44234-1.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, I. 2002. “Quantifying the Effects of Uncertainty in Building Simulation.” PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar
• Majcen, D., L. C. M. Itard, and H. Visscher. 2013. “Theoretical vs. Actual Energy Consumption of Labelled Dwellings in the Netherlands: Discrepancies and Policy Implications.” Energy Policy 54: 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mara, T., and S. Tarantola. 2008. “Application of Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output to Building Thermal Simulations.” Building Simulation 1 (4): 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-008-8129-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, É., A. Sasic Kalagasidis, and F. Johnsson. 2013. “Energy Usage and Technical Potential for Energy Saving Measures in the Swedish Residential Building Stock.” Energy Policy 55: 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, É., A. Sasic Kalagasidis, and F. Johnsson. 2014. “Building-stock Aggregation Through Archetype Buildings: France, Germany, Spain and the UK.” Building and Environment 81: 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCuen, R. H. 1973. “The Role of Sensitivity Analysis in Hydrologic Modeling.” Journal of Hydrology 18 (1): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(73)90024-3
   Google Scholar
• Menberg, K., Y. Heo, and R. Choudhary. 2016. “Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Building Energy Models: Comparing Computational Costs and Extractable Information.” Energy and Buildings 133: 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 1997. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. D. 1991. “Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments.” Technometrics 33 (2): 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, A. 2015. “Energy Demand Assessment for Space Conditioning and Domestic Hot Water: A Case Study for the Austrian Building Stock.” PhD thesis, Technische Universität Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. H., and D. C. Montgomery. 1995. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Naber, E., R. Volk, and F. Schultmann. 2017. “From the Building Level Energy Performance Assessment to the National Level: How are Uncertainties Handled in Building Stock Models.” Procedia Engineering 180: 1443–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.307
   Google Scholar
• Nägeli, C., C. Camarasa, M. Jakob, G. Catenazzi, and Y. Ostermeyer. 2018. “Synthetic Building Stocks as a Way to Assess the Energy Demand and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of National Building Stocks.” Energy and Buildings 173: 443–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEN. 2012. NEN 7120+C Energieprestatie van gebouwen - Bepalingsmethode. Delft: NEderlandse Norm.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A.-T., and S. Reiter. 2015. “A Performance Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Building Energy Models.” Building Simulation 8 (6): 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-015-0245-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nossent, J., P. Elsen, and W. Bauwens. 2011. “Sobol’ Sensitivity Analysis of a Complex Environmental Model.” Environmental Modelling & Software 26 (12): 1515–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österbring, M., É Mata, L. Thuvander, M. Mangold, F. Johnsson, and H. Wallbaum. 2016. “A Differentiated Description of Building-Stocks for a Georeferenced Urban Bottom-up Building-stock Model.” Energy and Buildings 120: 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianosi, F., K. Beven, J. Freer, J. W. Hall, J. Rougier, D. B. Stephenson, and T. Wagener. 2016. “Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental Models: A Systematic Review with Practical Workflow.” Environmental Modelling & Software 79: 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianosi, F., and T. Wagener. 2015. “A Simple and Efficient Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis Based on Cumulative Distribution Functions.” Environmental Modelling & Software 67: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianosi, F., and T. Wagener. 2018. “Distribution-based Sensitivity Analysis from a Generic Input-Output Sample.” Environmental Modelling & Software 108: 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plischke, E., E. Borgonovo, and C. L. Smith. 2013. “Global Sensitivity Measures from Given Data.” European Journal of Operational Research 226 (3): 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, T. A., I. Maor, and C. Panjapornpon. 2007. “Calibrating Detailed Building Energy Simulation Programs with Measured Data—Part I: General Methodology (RP-1051).” HVAC&R Research 13 (2): 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2007.10390952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refsgaard, J. C., J. P. van der Sluijs, A. L. Hojberg, and P. A. Vanrolleghem. 2007. “Uncertainty in the Environmental Modelling Process – A Framework and Guidance.” Environmental Modelling & Software 22 (11): 1543–1556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, C. F., and C. C. Davila. 2016. “Urban Building Energy Modeling – a Review of a Nascent Field.” Building and Environment 97: 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, J. L., and M. V. Chester. 2017. “Energy Efficiency to Reduce Residential Electricity and Natural Gas Use Under Climate Change.” Nature Communications 8: 14916. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, J., E. Wilson, A. Parker, A. Satre-Meloy, A. Egerter, C. Bianchi, M. Praprost, et al. 2022. U.S. Building Stock Characterization Study: A National Typology for Decarbonizing U.S. Buildings. NREL (Technical Report).
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., K. Aleksankina, W. Becker, P. Fennell, F. Ferretti, N. Holst, S. Li, and Q. Wu. 2019. “Why So Many Published Sensitivity Analyses are False: A Systematic Review of Sensitivity Analysis Practices.” Environmental Modelling & Software 114: 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., and P. Annoni. 2010. “How to Avoid a Perfunctory Sensitivity Analysis.” Environmental Modelling & Software 25 (12): 1508–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., K. Chan, and E. M. Scott. 2000. Sensitivity Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola. 2008. Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, F. Campolongo, and M. Ratto. 2004. Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models (Vol. 1). Probability and Statistics. Chichester, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, and K. P.-S. Chan. 1999. “A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output.” Technometrics 41 (1): 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, N. H., I. Sartori, and H. Brattebø. 2014a. “Sensitivity Analysis in Long-Term Dynamic Building Stock Modeling—Exploring the Importance of Uncertainty of Input Parameters in Norwegian Segmented Dwelling Stock Model.” Energy and Buildings 85: 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, N. H., I. Sartori, and H. Brattebø. 2014b. “Using a Dynamic Segmented Model to Examine Future Renovation Activities in the Norwegian Dwelling Stock.” Energy and Buildings 82: 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santner, T. J., B. J. Williams, and W. I. Notz. 2003. Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sarrazin, F., F. Pianosi, and T. Wagener. 2016. “Global Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental Models: Convergence and Validation.” Environmental Modelling & Software 79: 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, F. E. 1959. “Random Balance Experimentation.” Technometrics 1 (2): 111–137.
   Google Scholar
• Smirnov, N. 1939. “On the Estimation of the Discrepancy Between Empirical Curves of Distribution for Two Independent Samples.” Bulletin Mathématique de l’Université de Moscou 2 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Sobol’, I. M. 1990. “On Sensitivity Estimation for Nonlinear Mathematical Models.” Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 2 (1): 112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol’, I. M. 2001. “Global Sensitivity Indices for Nonlinear Mathematical Models and Their Monte Carlo Estimates.” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 55 (1-3): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4754(00)00270-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol’, I., and A. Gresham. 1995. “On an Alternative Global Sensitivity Estimators.” Proceedings of SAMO Conference, 40–42. Belgirate.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol’, I. M., and S. Kucherenko. 2009. “Derivative Based Global Sensitivity Measures and Their Link with Global Sensitivity Indices.” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 79 (10): 3009–3017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2009.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, X., J. Zhang, C. Zhan, Y. Xuan, M. Ye, and C. Xu. 2015. “Global Sensitivity Analysis in Hydrological Modeling: Review of Concepts, Methods, Theoretical Framework, and Applications.” Journal of Hydrology 523: 739–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SSG (Sustainability Solution Group). 2021. A State of the Art City-scale Energy, Emissions and Finance Model. http://cityinsight.ssg.coop/.
   Google Scholar
• Strobbe, T., R. Verstraeten, M. Delghust, J. Laverge, R. De Meyer, and A. Janssens. 2015. Using a Building Information Modelling Approach for Teaching about Residential Energy Use and Official Energy Performance.
   Google Scholar
• Tarantola, S., D. Gatelli, and T. A. Mara. 2006. “Random Balance Designs for the Estimation of First Order Global Sensitivity Indices.” Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91 (6): 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, W. 2013. “A Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods in Building Energy Analysis.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 20: 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, W., H. Yeonsook, P. de Wilde, Z. Li, D. Yan, P. Cheol-Soo, X. Feng, and G. Augenbroe. 2018. “A Review of Uncertainty Analysis in Building Energy Assessment.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 93: 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hove, M. Y. C. 2023a. Increasing Reliability of Bottom-up Building-Stock Energy Models Using Available Data-driven Techniques. Ghent: Ghent University. Faculty of Engineering and Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hove, M. Y. C., M. Delghust, and A. Janssens. 2021. “Analyse naar de haalbaarheid van statistische modellen die energiegebruik in woningen kunnen voorspellen op basis van gebouwparameters.” https://www.energiesparenbe/marktonderzoek.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hove, M. Y. C., M. Delghust, and J. Laverge. 2023b. “Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of Building-Stock Energy Models: Convergence of Sobol’ Indices and Building Stock Size.” Journal of Building Performance Simulation (in revision). https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2023.2201816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hove, M. Y. C., M. Deurinck, W. Lameire, J. Laverge, A. Janssens, and M. Delghust. 2023c. “Large-scale Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Real and Regulatory Total Energy use in Existing Single-Family Houses in Flanders.” Building Research and Information 51 (2): 203–222. doi:10.1080/09613218.2022.2113023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schepdael, A., A. Carlier, and L. Geris. 2016. “Sensitivity Analysis by Design of Experiments.” In Uncertainty in Biology. Studies in Mechanobiology, Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials, Vol. 17, edited by L. Geris, and D. Gomez-Cabrero. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21296-8_13.
   Google Scholar
• VEKA. 2015. Open data in Vlaanderen. Flemish Energy and Climate Agency. https://opendata.vlaanderen.be/.
   Google Scholar
• VEKA. 2017. “EPB-Bijlage V: Bepalingsmethode van het peil van primair energieverbruik van woongebouwen.” In Belgisch Staatsblad - Moniteur Belge, 1–182. Brussels: Flemish Regional Government.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. 2017. “ResStock – Targeting Energy and Cost Savings for U.S. Homes.” https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy17osti/68653.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. J., C. B. Christensen, S. G. Horowitz, J. J. Robertson, and J. B. Maguire. 2017. Energy Efficiency Potential in the U.S. Single-Family Housing Stock. Denver: National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL).
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., Y. Khare, X. Wang, P. B. Parajuli, I. Kisekka, and S. Finsterle. 2015. “Hydrologic and Water Quality Models: Sensitivity.” American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 58 (6): 1721–1744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar