Cognitive and metacognitive strategy use in poor comprehenders: an exploratory study

References

• Afsharrad, M., & Sadeghi Benis, A. R. (2017). Differences between monolinguals and bilinguals/males and females in English reading comprehension and reading strategy use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1037238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasiou, D., & Griva, E. (2009). Awareness of reading strategy use and reading comprehension among poor and good readers. İlköğretim Online, 8(2), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.65230
   Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2017). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners. New York: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Borkowski, J. G., Day, J. D., Saenz, D., Dietmeyer, D., Estrada, T. M., & Groteluschen, A. (1992). Expanding the boundaries of cognitive interventions. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Contemporary intervention and research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (pp. 1–21). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Botsas, G., & Padeliadu, S. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading difficulties. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4–5), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Cadime, I., Rodrigues, B., & Ribeiro, I. (2023). Reading strategy use scale: An analysis using the rasch rating scale model. Reading and Writing, 36(8), 2081–2098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10351-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantrell, S. C., & Carter, J. C. (2009). Relationships among learner characteristics and adolescents’ perceptions about reading strategy use. Reading Psychology, 30(Issue 3), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710802275397
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Z., & Lin, Y. (2020). A study on metacognitive strategy use in listening comprehension by vocational college students. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 127. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p127
   Google Scholar
• Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/023)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, P. J., Snowling, M., Truelove, E., & Hulme, C. (2010). Ameliorating children’s reading-comprehension difficulties: A randomized controlled trial. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1106–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610375449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.42.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colenbrander, D., Kohnen, S., Smith-Lock, K., & Nickels, L. (2016). Individual differences in the vocabulary skills of children with poor reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Wolters, C. A., York, M. J., Swanson, E., Kulesz, P. A., & Francis, D. J. (2015). Adolescents’ use of reading comprehension strategies: Differences related to reading proficiency, grade level, and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermitzaki, I., Andreou, G., & Paraskeva, V. (2008). High and low reading comprehension achievers’ strategic behaviors and their relation to performance in a reading comprehension situation. Reading Psychology, 29(6), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710802168519
   Google Scholar
• Elwér, Å., Gustafson, S., Byrne, B., Olson, R. K., Keenan, J. M., & Samuelsson, S. (2015). A retrospective longitudinal study of cognitive and language skills in poor reading comprehension. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erler, L., & Finkbeiner, C. H. (2007). A review of reading strategies: Focus on the impact of first language. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice (pp. 187–206). Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Frid, B., & Friesen, D. C. (2020). Reading comprehension and strategy use in fourth- and fifth-grade French immersion students. Reading and Writing, 33(5), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-10004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, R., Martinet, C., Detcheverry, C., & Bourdages, R. (2021). Stratégies d’apprentissage de la compréhension de textes oraux et écrits: En vue d’une clarification des concepts pour l’enseignement. ForumLecture, 1(2021), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Griva, E., Alevriadou, A., & Semoglou, K. (2012). Reading preferences and strategies employed by primary school students: Gender, socio-cognitive and citizenship issues. International Education Studies, 5(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n2p24
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, T. P., Bridges, M. S., Justice, L. M., & Cain, K. (2011). Increasing higher level language skills to improve reading comprehension. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v44i3.6688
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2020). The cognitive foundations of reading acquisition. In The cognitive foundations of reading and its acquisition: A framework with applications connecting teaching and learning (pp. 41–84). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44195-1
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Children’s reading comprehension difficulties: Nature, causes, and treatments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411408673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., Hudson, R. F., & Johnson, E. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 582–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., & Creech, J. C. (1983). Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models: a simulation study of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 48(3), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemi, A., & Kiamarsi, S. (2017). An investigation into listening comprehension strategies and the relationship between listening comprehension strategies and overall proficiency level of intermediate and advanced learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0801.18
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., Hua, A. N., Meenan, C. E., Pennington, B. F., Willcutt, E., & Olson, R. K. (2014). Issues in identifying poor comprehenders. L’Année Psychologique, Vol. 114(4), 753–777. https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy.144.0753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, K., Whitworth, A., & Leitão, S. (2021). Profiles of oral and reading comprehension in poor comprehenders. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1982432
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2015). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: Evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Phillips, B. (2014). Cognitive correlates of listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 71–92). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kök, İ. (2018). Relationship between listening comprehension strategy use and listening comprehension proficiency. International Journal of Listening, 32(3), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1276457
   Google Scholar
• Korthof, E. C., & Guda, M. C. (2016). The relation between reading strategies and reading comprehension Science Studies of Reading, 21(3), 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köse, N., & Güneş, F. (2021). Undergraduate students’ use of metacognitive strategies while reading and the relationship between strategy use and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Education & Learning, 10(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n2p99
   Google Scholar
• Lau, K.-L. (2006). Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers: A think-aloud study. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K.-L., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., Lipka, O., & Siegel, L. S. (2006). Investigating cognitive and linguistic abilities that influence the reading comprehension skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4713-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, X., Zhu, X., & Zhao, P. (2021). The mediating effects of reading amount and strategy use in the relationship between intrinsic reading motivation and comprehension: Differences between grade 4 and grade 6 students. Reading and Writing, 35(5), 1091–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10218-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto, A., Pfost, M., & Artelt, C. (2019). The relationship between intrinsic motivation and reading comprehension: Mediating effects of reading amount and metacognitive knowledge of strategy use. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(6), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1602836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namaziandost, E., Neisi, L., Mahdavirad, F., Nasri, M., & Monacis, L. (2019). The relationship between listening comprehension problems and strategy usage among advance EFL learners. Cogent Psychology, 6(1).https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1691338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, K., Cocksey, J., Taylor, J. S., & Bishop, D. V. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(9), 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02254.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M. M., & Dinsmore, D. L. (2018). Multiple aspects of high school students’ strategic processing on reading outcomes: The role of quantity, quality, and conjunctive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A., Mouzaki, A., Sideridis, G. D., Kotsolakou, A., & Simos, P. G. (2013). The role of vocabulary in the context of the simple view of reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29(2), 168–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.758569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, I., Dias, O., Oliveira, I. M., Miranda, P., Ferreira, G. … Cadime, I. (2015). Adaptação e validação da escala Reading Strategy Use para a população portuguesa [Adaptation and validation of the Reading Strategy Use Scale for the portuguese population]. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 40(2), 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, B., Cadime, I., Freitas, T., Choupina, C., Baptista, A., Viana, F. L., & Ribeiro, I. (2022). Assessing oral reading fluency within and across grade levels: Development of equated test forms. Behavior Research Methods, 54(6), 3043–3054. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01806-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, B., Cadime, I., Viana, F. L., & Ribeiro, I. (2020). Developing and validating tests of reading and listening comprehension for fifth and sixth grade students in Portugal. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 610876. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.610876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, B., Ribeiro, I., & Cadime, I. (2023). Reading, linguistic, and metacognitive skills: Are the relations reciprocal past the first school years? Reading and Writing, 36(9), 2251–2273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10333-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellings, G., Aarnoutse, C., & van Leeuwe, J. (2006). Third-grader’s think-aloud protocols: Types of reading activities in reading an expository text. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seipel, B., Carlson, S. E., & Clinton, V. E. (2017). When do comprehender groups differ? A moment-by-moment analysis of think-aloud protocols of good and poor comprehenders. Reading Psychology, 38(1), 39–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1216489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, P., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Schatschneider, C., & Torgesen, J. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide (NCEE 2010-4038). What works clearinghouse practice Guide. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. whatworks.ed.gov/publications/practiceguides
   Google Scholar
• Simões, M. R., & Albuquerque, C. P. (2002). Estudos com a versão portuguesa da WISC-III no âmbito da validade concorrente e preditiva: Relação com as classificações escolares [Predictive validity of the Portuguese version of the WISC-III: Relationship with school grades]. Psychologica, 29, 153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Spörer, N., Brunstein, J. C., & Kieschke, U. (2009). Improving students’ reading comprehension skills: Effects of strategy instruction and reciprocal teaching. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, K., & Del Río, F. (2014). The role of comprehension monitoring, theory of mind, and vocabulary depth in predicting story comprehension and recall of kindergarten children. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucena, A., Castro, S. L., & Seymour, P. (2009). Developmental dyslexia in an orthography of intermediate depth: The case of European Portuguese. Reading and Writing, 22(7), 791–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-008-9156-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4), 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-5-4-18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Ammel, K., & Keer, H. V. (2021). Skill or will? The respective contribution of motivational and behavioural characteristics to secondary school students’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(3), 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Völlinger, V. A., Spörer, N., Lubbe, D., & Brunstein, J. C. (2018). A path analytic test of the reading strategies mediation model: Relating cognitive competences and motivational influences to individual differences in fifth-grade students’ reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 111(6), 733–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1412930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2003). Escala de Inteligência de Wechsler para Crianças [Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children] (WISC-III) (3rd ed.). Lisboa: CEGOC-TEA.
   Google Scholar
• Zumbo, B. D., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1993). Is the selection of statistical methods governed by level of measurement? Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 34(4), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar