An implementation case study for the Response to Intervention (RTI) approach for oral language and reading instruction in the early years of primary school

References

• Australian Government. (2022). Nationally Consistent Collection of Data on School Students with Disability. https://www.nccd.edu.au/
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., & Kirchner, J. (2020). Implementation science: What is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Research, 283, 112376. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.04.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, R., & Lillenstein, J. (2012). Response to intervention and the changing roles of school-wide personnel. The Reading Teacher, 65(7), 491–501. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beek, G., Zuiker, I., & Zwart, R. C. (2019). Exploring mentors’ roles and feedback strategies to analyze the quality of mentoring dialogues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78(1), 15–27. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Benedict, A. E., Park, Y., Brownell, M. T., Lauterbach, A. A., & Kiely, M. T. (2013). Using lesson study to align elementary literacy instruction within the RTI framework. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(5), 22–30. doi:10.1177/004005991304500503
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. C., Daley, T., Levin, M., O’Reilly, F., Parsad, A., Robertson, A., & Werner, A. (2011). IDEA national assessment implementation study. Final Report. NCEE 2011-4027. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20114026/pdf/20114027.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, C. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J., & Meeks, L. (2019). Short-changed: Preparation to teach reading in initial teacher education. Sydney: MultiLit.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R. (2013). Why Jaydon can’t read: The triumph of ideology over evidence in teaching reading. Policy, 29(3), 21–32. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.738091813029033
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J., Wheldall, K., & Beaman-Wheldall, R. (2019). Systematic and explicit phonics instruction: A scientific, evidence-based approach to teaching the alphabetic principle. In R. Cox, S. Feez, & L. Beveridge (Eds.), The alphabetic principle and beyond (pp. 49–67). Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, J., Wang, J., Daye, J., Shum, K., & March, A. (2018). A longitudinal analysis of the relations among professional development, educators’ beliefs and perceived skills, and response-to-intervention implementation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 28(4), 413–444. doi:10.1080/10474412.2017.1394864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, M. D., McCoach, D. B., Ware, S. M., Loftus-Rattan, S. M., Baker, D. L., Santoro, L. E., & Oldham, A. C. (2022). Supporting vocabulary development within a multitiered system of support: Evaluating the efficacy of supplementary kindergarten vocabulary intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1225–1241. doi:10.1037/edu0000724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, A., Coggshall, J. G., Dolan, M., & Powers, E. (2010). Job-embedded professional development: What it is, who is responsible, and how to get it done well. Issue brief. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED520830.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 100. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Disability Standards for Education. Cth (2005). https://www.education.gov.au/disability-standards-education-2005
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & Flugman, B. (2018). Mentoring teachers in systematic phonics instruction: Effectiveness of an intensive year-long program for kindergarten through 3rd grade teachers and their students. Reading and Writing, 31(2), 425–456. doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9792-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elek, C., Page, J., & Eadie, P. (2022). Does coaching for early childhood educators unfold as planned? Comparing observed coaching practice to coaches’ and educators’ perceptions. International Journal of Educational Research, 116, 102088. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, A., Noonan, P., & Jenson, R. (2012). The school implementation scale: Measuring implementation in response to intervention models. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 10(2), 33–52. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ998224.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., & Dombek, J. (2018). The relative impact of aligning Tier 2 intervention materials with classroom core reading materials in grades K–2. The Elementary School Journal, 118(3), 477–504. doi:10.1086/696021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke, S., Bowyer‐Crane, C., Haley, A. J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2013). Efficacy of language intervention in the early years. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(3), 280–290. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerzel-Short, L., & Wilkins, E. A. (2009). Response to intervention: Helping all students learn. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 45(3), 106–110. doi:10.1080/00228958.2009.10517298
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Bouton, B., Barquero, L. A., & Cho, E. (2013). Efficacy of a first‐grade responsiveness‐to‐intervention prevention model for struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 135–154. doi:10.1002/rrq.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillon, G., McNeill, B., Scott, A., Denston, A., Wilson, L., Carson, K., & Macfarlane, A. H. (2019). A better start to literacy learning: Findings from a teacher-implemented intervention in children’s first year at school. Reading and Writing, 32(8), 1989–2012. doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9933-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfeld, S., Beatson, R., Watts, A., Snow, P., Gold, L., Le, H. N. Edwards, S., Connell, J., Stark, H., Shingles, B & Eadie, P. (2022). Tier 2 oral language and early reading interventions for preschool to grade 2 children: A restricted systematic review. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 27(1), 65–113. doi:10.1080/19404158.2021.2011754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfeld, S., Moreno-Betancur, M., Guo, S., Mensah, F., O’Connor, E., Gray, S., Shiau Chong, Sue Woolfenden, Katrina Williams, Amanda Kvalsvig, Hannah Badland, Francisco Azpitarte & O’Connor, M. (2021). Inequities in children’s reading skills: The role of home reading and preschool attendance. Academic Pediatrics, 21(6), 1046–1054. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2021.04.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D., Blundell, C., Mills, R., & Bourke, T. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy and reform: A systematic literature review. The Australian Educational Researcher, 1–21. doi:10.1007/s13384-022-00526-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers & Teaching, 8(3), 381–391. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2020). Reprint of: Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 283, 112629. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, M., Bucholz, J. L., Goodman, J. I., Duffy, M. L., & Brady, M. P. (2010). Response to intervention: General or special education? Who is responsible? The Educational Forum, 75(1), 17–25. doi:10.1080/00131725.2010.528552
   Google Scholar
• Hempenstall, K. (2003). The three‐cueing system: Trojan horse? Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 8(2), 15–23. doi:10.1080/19404150309546726
   Google Scholar
• Hempenstall, K. (2016). Read about it: Scientific evidence for effective teaching of reading. Centre for Independent Studies. https://www.cis.org.au/publication/read-about-it-scientific-evidence-for-effective-teaching-of-reading/
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, A. K., Moore, K. A., Han, B., Wee Koh, P., Binks-Cantrell, E., & Malatesha Joshi, R. (2021). Elementary teachers’ knowledge of foundational literacy skills: A critical piece of the puzzle in the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), S287–S315. doi:10.1002/rrq.408
   Google Scholar
• Instructure Inc. (2008). CANVAS Learning Management System.
   Google Scholar
• Isbell, L., & Szabo, S. (2015). Assessment: Teacher efficacy and response to intervention. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 81(2), 41–46. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/assessment-teacher-efficacy-response-intervention/docview/1647368758/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Jayaraman, G., Marvin, C., Knoche, L., & Bainter, S. (2015). Coaching conversations in early childhood programs. Infants & Young Children, 28(4), 323–336. doi:10.1097/IYC.0000000000000048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B. R., & Showers, B. (1981). Transfer of training: The contribution of “coaching.” Journal of Education, 163(2), 163–172. doi:10.1177/002205748116300208
   Google Scholar
• Keller‐Margulis, M. A. (2012). Fidelity of implementation framework: A critical need for response to intervention models. Psychology in the Schools, 49(4), 342–352. doi:10.1002/pits.21602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846–854. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Volpiansky, P., Clements, M., & Ball, C. (2019). Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models: Implications for response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 618–631. doi:10.1080/02796015.2007.12087921
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., Charlton, J., Dockrell, J., Gascoigne, M., McKean, C., & Theakston, A. (2017). Early language development: Needs, provision and intervention for preschool children from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds. London: Education Endowment Foundation. Public Health England.
   Google Scholar
• Lopuch, J. (2018). Context matters: Insight on how school-based factors impact the implementation of response to intervention and achievement for students with learning disabilities. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 15(2), 207–221. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1203401.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maier, M. P., Pate, J. L., Gibson, N. M., Hilgert, L., Hull, K., & Campbell, P. C. (2016). A quantitative examination of school leadership and response to intervention. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(2), 103–112. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. M., & Behar-Horenstein, L. S. (2015). When leadership matters: Perspectives from a teacher team implementing response to intervention. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(3), 383–402. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI: A closer look at response to intervention. ERIC Clearinghouse. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Centre on Response to Intervention. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED526858.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel (US), National Institute of Child Health, Human Development (US), National Reading Excellence Initiative, National Institute for Literacy (US), & U.S. Department of Health. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pd
   Google Scholar
• Nellis, L. M. (2012). Maximizing the effectiveness of building teams in response to intervention implementation. Psychology in the Schools, 49(3), 245–256. doi:10.1002/pits.21594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. E., Welsh, J. A., Trup, E. M. V., & Greenberg, M. T. (2011). Language delays of impoverished preschool children in relation to early academic and emotion recognition skills. First Language, 31(2), 164–194. doi:10.1177/0142723710391887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 532–566. doi:10.3102/0002831208328088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noell, G., & Gansle, K. (2016). Assuring the response to intervention process has substance: Assessing and supporting intervention implementation. In S. Jimerson, M. Burns, & A. Van Der Heyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_24
   Google Scholar
• Noltemeyer, A. L., Boone, W. J., & Sansosti, F. J. (2014). Assessing school-level RTI implementation for reading: Development and piloting of the RTIS-R. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 40(1), 40–52. doi:10.1177/1534508414530462
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunn, G. D., Jantz, P. B., & Butikofer, C. (2009). Concurrent validity between teacher efficacy and perceptions of response to intervention outcomes. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36(3), 215–219. https://www.proquest.com/docview/213903870?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. M. (2013). Readiness to change—effective implementation processes for meeting people where they are. In T. Halle, A. Metz, & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Applying implementation science to early childhood programs and systems. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Piasta, S. B., Connor, C. M., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(3), 224–248. doi:10.1080/10888430902851364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolsky, A., Kini, T., Bishop, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Solving the teacher shortage: How to attract and retain excellent educators. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Poulou, M. S., Reddy, L. A., & Dudek, C. M. (2019). Relation of teacher self-efficacy and classroom practices: A preliminary investigation. School Psychology International, 40(1), 25–48. doi:10.1177/0143034318798045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, P. C., van Dijk, W., Gonsalves, V. E., Lane, H. B., & Ashworth, K. E. (2018). RTI and MTSS: Response to intervention and multi-tiered systems of support: How do they differ and how are they the same, if at all? In P. Pullen, & M. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention and multi-tiered systems of support (pp. 5–10). Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. (2020). NVivo (released in March 2020). https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, K. (2005). Teaching reading: National inquiry into the teaching of literacy. Department of Education, Science and Training, Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/tll_misc/5/
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, E., Chow, K., Thayer, S., Nakamura, J., Wilkerson, S. B., & Puma, M. (2020). What tools have states developed or adapted to assess schools’ implementation of a multi-tiered system of supports/Response to intervention framework? REL 2020-017. Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia. https://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=REL2020017
   Google Scholar
• Serry, T. A., & Oberklaid, F. (2015). Children with reading problems: Missed opportunities to make a difference. Australian Journal of Education, 59(1), 22–34. doi:10.1177/0004944114555584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (2020). What constitutes a science of reading instruction? Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S235–S247. doi:10.1002/rrq.349
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, K., Sanders, K., Noltemeyer, A., Hoffman, J., & Boone, W. (2016). The relationship between RTI implementation and reading achievement: A school-level analysis. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children & Youth, 60(2), 152–160. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2015.1063038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, P. (2014). Oral language competence and the transition to school: Socio-economic and behavioural factors that influence academic and social success. International Journal on School Disaffection, 11(1), 3–24. doi:10.18546/IJSD.11.1.01
   Google Scholar
• Snow, P. C. (2021). SOLAR: The science of language and reading. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 37(3), 222–233. doi:10.1177/0265659020947817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spira, E. G., Bracken, S. S., & Fischel, J. E. (2005). Predicting improvement after first grade reading difficulties: The effects of oral language, emergent literacy, and behaviour skills. Developmental Psychology, 41(1), 225–234. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, H. L., Snow, P. C., Eadie, P. A., & Goldfeld, S. R. (2016). Language and reading instruction in early years’ classrooms: The knowledge and self-rated ability of Australian teachers. Annals of Dyslexia, 66(1), 28–54. doi:10.1007/s11881-015-0112-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496–536. doi:10.1177/0013161X11400185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2001). Mentoring conversations designed to promote student teacher learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2), 111–123. doi:10.1080/13598660120061309
   Google Scholar
• Tyre, A. D., Feuerborn, L., Beisse, K., & McCready, C. (2012). Creating readiness for response to intervention: An evaluation of readiness assessment tools. Contemporary School Psychology: Formerly “the California School Psychologist”, 16(1), 103–114. doi:10.1007/BF03340979
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Department of Education (2021). Students with Disability Policy. https://www2.education.vic.gov.au/pal/students-disability/policy
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, E. K., Bailey, K., Pierce, A., Stewart, C., Hawley, J., Blackman, J., & Fenty, N. (2022). Collaborative professional development on data‐based decision making for primary teachers of struggling readers: Responding and refining. Journal of Research in Reading, 45(3), 425–446. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, A., Shingles, B., Edwards, S., & Goldfeld, S. (2022). Support for students with additional health and developmental needs: Practices and learnings from exemplar schools. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 27(2), 223–251. doi:10.1080/19404158.2022.2115091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westwood, P. (2017). Learning disorders: A response to intervention perspective. Routledge. doi:10.1002/rrq.45
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, S. H., Purnell, J. Q., Simon, S. M., Zimmerman, E. B., Camberos, G. J., Haley, A., & Fields, R. P. (2015). Translating evidence into population health improvement: Strategies and barriers. Annual Review of Public Health, 36(1), 463–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082214-110901
   PubMedGoogle Scholar