Middle Level Teacher Certification in South Carolina: A Case Study in Educational Policy Development

References

• Alexander, W. M. (1965/1995). The junior high school: A changing view. Middle School Journal, 26(3), 20–24. (Reprinted from G. Hass & K. Wiles (Eds.), Readings in curriculum. Boston: Allyn & Bacon)
   Google Scholar
• Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1973-1978). Federal programs supporting educational change. (Vols. 1–8). Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, B. R., Medford, L. F., Pendarvis, P. W., & Splittgerber, F. L. (2004). A research agenda for middle level education in South Carolina. Columbia, SC: South Carolina Middle School Association/Middle Level Teacher Education Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. T. (1978). A comparative study of middle school practices recommended in current literature and practices of middle schools in South Carolina. Unpublished dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Burke P. J., & Stoltenberg, J. C. (1979). Certification for middle grades. Action in Teacher Education, 1(3–4), 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Children’s Defense Fund. (1988). Making the middle grades work. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooney, S. (2002). A highly-qualified teacher in every classroom: What states, districts, and schools can do. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elrod, A. L. (1994, April). Teacher tenure reform: Problem definition in policy formulation. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED374536)
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. G. (1996). Turning systematic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(6), 420–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskill, P. E. (2002). Progress in the certification of middle level personnel. Middle School Journal, 3(5), 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Governor’s Middle Grades Task Force. (1999, December). Preliminary report from the Governor’s Middle Grades Task Force. Columbia, SC: Author. Retrieved January 12, 2006, from http://www.scstatehouse.net/reports/pmgtsk.doc
   Google Scholar
• Hanf, K., & Toonen, T. A. J. (1985). Introduction. In K. Hanf & T. A. J. Toonen (Eds.), Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems (pp. v–xi). Boston: Martinus Nijoff.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M. G., & Hopkins, D. (Eds.). (1998). International handbook of educational change. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Holderness, S. T. (1990). The politics of state educational policy-making: A case study of gifted education policy in New Mexico, 1985–1989. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(11), 3576. (UMI No. 9111465)
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, R. L. (1982). Perceptions of the relative achievement of the middle school concept in South Carolina. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(04), 994. (UMI No. 8220206)
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Kirst, M., & Jung, R. (1982). The utility of a longitudinal approach in assessing implementation: A thirteen- year view of Title I, ESEA. In W. Williams (Ed.), Studying implementation: Methodological and administrative issues (pp. 119–148). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, J. M. (2002). Three streams and four policy entrepreneurs converge: A policy window opens. Education and Urban Society, 34(4), 438–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, J. H. (1960/1998). What keeps junior from growing up? In R. David (Ed.), Moving forward from the past: Early writings and current reflections of middle school founders (pp. 106–109). Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association. (Reprinted from Clearing House, 34(5), 30–303)
   Google Scholar
• Mazamanian, D., & Sabatier, P. (1989). Implementation and public policy: With a new postscript. Latham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K. (1983). Middle level teacher education and certification. NASSP Bulletin, 67(463), 78–82.
   Google Scholar
• McEwin, C. K., & Dickinson, T. S. (1995). The professional preparation of middle level teachers: Profiles of successful programs. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. (1998). Listening and learning from the field: tales of policy implementation and situated practice. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. G. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 70–84). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, K. M. (2000). Setting the agenda for state decentralization of higher education: Analyzing the explanatory power of alternative agenda models. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(07), 2624. (UMI No. 9977218)
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study: Applications in education (Rev. ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Middle school messes. (1999, January 4). The State, p. A8.
   Google Scholar
• Middle school teaching needs own certification. (1999, November 27). The State, p. A20.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. T. (1971). Title I of ESEA: The politics of implementing federal education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 35–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, R., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pendarvis, P. W. (1995). Preparation and certification of middle school principals: A study of the perceived need and possible conceptual framework for changing the way middle school principals are licensed in South Carolina. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(12), 4628. (UMI No. 9611243)
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, B. (1998, November 29). Teaching criteria in spotlight board may raise bar on test scores. The State, p. B1.
   Google Scholar
• South Carolina Middle Grades Schools State Policy Initiative. (1991, September). Turning Points self-assessment by 40 middle school teams. Columbia, SC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• South Carolina Center for the Advancement of Teaching and School Leadership. (1994). Changing South Carolina’s schools: A resource guide for schools and communities creating a new vision of public education. Rock Hill, SC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• South Carolina Middle Grades Task Force. (2001). Second report of the Governor’s Middle Grades Task Force. Retrieved March 24, 2005, from http://www.myscschools.com/Reports/midgrade2.htm
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• State Department of Education. (1975). South Carolina middle school guide. Columbia, SC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 158–183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swaim, J. H., & Stefanich, G. P. (1996). Meeting the standards: Middle level teacher education. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
   Google Scholar
• Teacher Licensure Steering Committee. (1996, May). At the crossroads: Teacher licensure in South Carolina. A vision for the future (Discussion Paper). Columbia, SC: South Carolina State Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Toepfer, C. F. (1965/1998). Who should teach in junior high school? In R. David (Ed.), Moving forward from the past: Early writings and current reflections of middle school founders (pp. 129–133). Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association. (Reprinted from Clearing House, 40(2), 74–76).
   Google Scholar
• Weatherley, R., & Lipsky, M. (1977). Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing educational reform. Harvard Educational Review, 47(2), 171–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar